Skip to main content
Log in

Democratizing society and food systems: Or how do we transform modern structures of power?

  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The evolution of societies and food systems across the grand transitions is traced to show how nature and culture have been transformed along with the basic structures of power, politics, and governance. A central, but neglected, element has been the synergy between the creation of industrial institutions and the exponential, but unsustainable growth of the built environment. The values, goals, and strategies needed to transform and diversify these structures – generally and in terms of food and agriculture – are discussed in terms of: 1) the need to diversify and decentralize the built environment as we move towards a post-fossil fuel society; and 2) the need to transform industrial institutions. To help develop more sustainable and regenerative institutions it is argued we will need to re-embed culture and society in nature; re-embed science, technology, and economics in society and nature; and re-embed governance and politics in society, something that requires a rethinking of representative democracy. Also, since the reforms needed to democratize society and to democratize food systems are parallel and reinforcing, it is crucial that each of us thinks through the linkages and the potential synergies and acts constructively in each realm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allenby, B. R. (1999). Industrial Ecology: Policy Framework and Implementation. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, B. R. (1998). A Place for Us: How toMake Society Civil and Democracy Strong. New York: Hill and Wang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J. W. (1976). The Ecological Transition: Cultural Anthropology and Human Adaptation. Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bookchin, M. (1995). The Philosophy of Social Ecology: Essays on Dialectical Naturalism. New York: Black Rose Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, M. (1995). “Federalism, subsidiarity and the European Union,” in P. Furlong and A. Cox (eds.), The European Union at the Crossroads (pp. 11–35). Boston: Earlsgate Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busch, L. (2000). The Eclipse of Morality: Science, State, and Market. Hawthorne, New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, M. (1998). “Dirt in our mouths and hunger in our bellies: Metaphor, theory-making and systems approaches to sustainable agriculture.” Agriculture and Human Values 15: 57–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza, R. (ed.) (1991). Ecological Economics: The Science and Management of Sustainability. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Counihan, C. and P. VanEsterik (1997). Food and Culture: A Reader. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlberg, K. A. (1989). “The value content of agricultural technologies and their effect on rural regions and farmers.” Journal of Agricultural Ethics 2: 87–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlberg, K. A. (1990). “The industrial model and its impacts on small farmers: The green revolution as a case,” in M. Altieri and S. B. Hecht (eds.), Agroecology and Small Farm Development (pp. 83–90). Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlberg, K. A. (1992). “Renewable resource systems and regimes: Key missing links in global change studies.” Global Environmental Change 2: 128–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlberg, K. A. (1996). “World food problems: Making the transition from agriculture to regenerative food systems,” in D. Pirages (ed.), Building Sustainable Societies: A Blueprint for a Post-Industrial World (pp. 257–274). Armonk, New York: M. E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, H. E. (1991). Steady State-Economics. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, J. (1997). Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. (2000). Purity and Danger: An Analysis of the Concepts of Pollution and Taboo, 2nd edn. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. (1986). How Institutions Think. Syracuse, New York: Syracuse University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek, J. S. (1987). Rational Ecology: Environment and Political Economy. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, A. (1997). The New Golden Rule: Community and Morality in a Democratic Society. London: Profile.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grigg, D. B. (1984). “The agricultural revolution in Western Europe,” in T. P. Bayless-Smith and S. Wanmali (eds.), Understanding Green Revolutions (pp. 1–17). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollingsworth, J. R. and R. Boyer (1997). Contemporary Capitalism: The Embeddedness of Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. (2000). The Nature of Economies. New York: Modern Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, M. (1972). “The new homesteading movement: From utopia to eutopia,” in S. TeSelle (ed.), The Family, Communes, and Utopian Societies (pp. 63–82). New York: Harper Torchbooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kersbergen, K. and B. Verbeek (1994). “The politics of subsidiarity in the European Union.” Journal of Common Market Studies 32: 215–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kneen, B. (1999). “Restructuring food for corporate profit: The corporate genetics of Cargill and Monsanto.” Agriculture and Human Values 16: 161–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohr, L. (1978). The Overdeveloped Nations: The Diseconomies of Scale. New York: Schocken.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, T. (1998). “Towards a food democracy,” in S. Griffiths and J. Wallace (eds.), Consuming Passions: Food in the Age of Anxiety. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, H. (1958). Politics: Who Gets What, When, How. New York: Meridian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leftwich, A. (1983). Redefining Politics: People, Resources, and Power. New York: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovelock, J. (1979). Gaia: A New Look at Life on Earth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovelock, J. (1988). The Ages of Gaia: A Biography of Our Living Earth. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannheim, K. (1960). Ideology and Utopia. New York: Harcourt, Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Alier, J. with K. Schüpmann (1987). Ecological Economics: Energy, Environment and Society. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, J. P. and M. Lerner (eds.) (1966). Alexis de Tocqueville. Democracy in America. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMichael, P. (2000). “The power of food.” Agriculture and Human Values 17: 21–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messer, E. (1984). “Anthropological perspectives on diet.” Annual Review of Anthropology 13: 205–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moran, E. F. (1979). Human Adaptability: An Introduction to Ecological Anthropology. North Scituate, Massachusetts: Duxbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, K. (1965). The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, K. (1968). Primitive, Archaic and Modern Economics: Essays of Karl Polanyi. Garden City, New York: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riches, G. (1999). “Advancing the human right to food in Canada: Social policy and the politics of hunger, welfare, and food security.” Agriculture and Human Values 16: 161–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, J. (1979). The Sane Alternative: A Choice of Futures. St. Paul, Minnesota: River Basin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sale, K. (1985). Dwellers in the Land: The Bioregional Vision. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher, E. F. (1973). Small is Beautiful: Economics as if People Mattered. New York: Harper Torchbooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiva, V. (1993). Monocultures of the Mind: Biodiversity, Biotechnology, and the Third World. Penang, Malaysia: Third World Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiva, V. (2000). Stolen Harvest: The Highjacking of the Global Food Supply. Cambridge, Massachusetts: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steward, J. H., R. M. Adams, D. Collier, A. Palerm, K. A. Wittfogel, and R. L. Beals. (1955). Irrigation Civilizations: A Comparative Study. Washington, DC: Pan American Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Struever, S. (ed.) (1971). Prehistoric Agriculture. Garden City, New York: Natural History Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toussaint-Samat, M. (1992). History of Food. Oxford: Blackwell Reference.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations University (1994). Industrial Metabolism: Restructuring for Sustainable Development. New York: United Nations University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitousek, P. M., P. R. Ehrlich, A. E. Ehrlich, and P. A. Matson (1987). “Human appropriation of the products of photosynthesis.” BioScience 36: 368–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel, M. (1996). Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth. Philadelphia: New Society Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dahlberg, K.A. Democratizing society and food systems: Or how do we transform modern structures of power?. Agriculture and Human Values 18, 135–151 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011175626010

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011175626010

Navigation