Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Dangerous Places and Nimble Fingers: Discourses of Gender Discrimination and Rights in Global Corporations

  • Published:
International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper considers how women's employment rights are being constructed in multinational corporations by examining three high-tech organizations—a U.S. company in Silicon Valley, its subsidiary in New Delhi, India, and a comparable local Indian company. It first describes the legal frameworks for addressing gender employment discrimination by state governments in India and the United States. Then it examines how these frameworks are appropriated and negotiated within the local contexts of the workplaces in the study. Finally, it reflects on recent transnational attempts to legislate and enforce women's employment rights in multinational corporations, specifically the challenges that such attempts face in light of the three case studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Ayoub, Lena. 1999. “Nike Just Does It-And Why the United States Shouldn't: The United States' International Obligation to Hold MNCs Accountable for Their Labor Rights Violations Abroad,” DePaul Business Law Journal 11 (395).

  • Banerjee, Nirmala, ed. 1991. IndianWomen in a Changing Industrial Scenario. New Delhi: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlett, Donald L. and James B. Steele. 1994. America: Who Really Pays the Taxes. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basu, Amrita, ed. 1995. The Challenge of Local Feminisms. Boulder:Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beeman, Mark, Geeta Chowdhry, and Karmen Todd. 2000. “Educating Students about Affirmative Action: An Analysis of University Sociology Texts.” Teaching Sociology 28(2):98-115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bello, Walden, Kenny Bruno, and Joshua Karliner. 2001. “Global Compact-Groups Call for Suspension in Porto Alegre.” Corporate Watch: The Watchdog on the Web, http://www.corpwatch.org/ trac/globalization/un/papr.html (Visited February).

  • Berkovitch, Nitza. 1999. From Motherhood to Citizenship: Women's Rights and International Organizations. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cloud, Kathleen. 2000. “A First Report on the Gender and Agribusiness Project: Two Case Studies.” Perspectives: Newsletter of the Women and Gender in Global Perspectives Program, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 21(1):1-4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conference Board. 2001. “Global Corporate Citizenship.” http://www.conference-board.org/ expertise/citizenship.cfm (Visited April).

  • Cook, Meredith Poznanski. 1996. “The Extraterritorial Application of Title VII: Does the Foreign Compulsion Defense Work?” Suffolk Transnational Law Review 20 (133).

  • Danaher, Kevin. 1996. “Introduction: Corporate Power and the Quality of Life.” Pp. 15-32 in Corporations Are Going to GetYourMama:Globalization andDownsizing of the American Dream, edited by K. Danaher. Monroe, ME: Common Courage Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Kirsten K. 1996. “Equal Protection for Women in India and Canada: An Examination and Comparison of Sex Equality Provisions in the Indian and Canadian Constitutions.” Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law 13(31).

  • Dugger, Celia W. 1999. “Lower-Caste Women Turn Village Rule Upside Down.” New York Times (May 3):A1, A10.

  • Elson, Diane and Ruth Pearson. 1981. “Nimble Fingers Make Cheap Workers: An Analysis of Women's Employment in Third World Export Manufacturing.” Feminist Review Spring:87-107.

  • Farley, Christine Haight. 1996. “Men May Work From Sun to Sun, But Women's Work is Never Done: International Law and The Regulation of Women's Work at Night.” Circles: The Buffalo Women's Journal of Law and Social Policy 4(44).

  • Ginsburg, Ruth Bader and Deborah Jones Merritt. 1999. “Affirmative Action: An International Human Rights Dialogue.” Cardozo Law Review 21(253).

  • Green, Susan. 1983. “Silicon Valley's Women Workers: A Theoretical Analysis of Sex-Segregation in the Electronics Industry Labor Market.” In Women, Men, and the International Division of Labor, edited by J. Nash and M. P. Fernandez-Kelly. Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhouse, Steven. 2000. “M.I.T. Report Says International Accounting Firm Overlooks Factory Abuses.” New York Times (September 28):A12.

  • Ho, Laura, Catherine Powell, and Leti Volpp. 1996. “(Dis)Assembling Rights of Women Workers Along the Global Assembly Line: Human Rights and The Garment Industry.” Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Rights Law Review 31(383).

  • Hossfeld, Karen J. 1990. “Their Logic Against Them: Contradictions in Sex, Race, and Class in Silicon Valley.” Pp. 149-178 in Women Workers and Global Restructuring, edited by K. Ward. Ithaca: ILR Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Labor Office. 2001.“Summary Description of ILOE quality Conventions, Nos. 100 and 111.” http://www.ilo.org/public/english/standards/norm/whatare/fundam/discrim.htm Geneva: International Labour Standards Department.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, Naomi and David S. Kemnitzer. 1983. “Fast Forward: The Internationalization of Silicon Valley.” Pp. 332-345 in Women, Men, and the International Division of Labor, edited by J. Nash and M. P. Fernandez-Kelly. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler-Harris, Alice. 1982. Out to Work: A History of Wage-Earning Women in the United States. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korten, David. 1996. “When Corporations Rule the World.” Pp. 49-56 in Corporations Are Going to Get Your Mama: Globalization and Downsizing of the American Dream, edited by K. Danaher. Monroe, ME: Common Courage Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubal, Ursula R. 1999. “U.S. Multinational Corporations Abroad: A Comparative Perspective on Sex Discrimination Law in the United States and the European Union.” North Carolina Journal of International Law & Commercial Regulation 25(207).

  • Louie, Miriam Ching. 1997. “Breaking the Cycle: Women Workers Confront Corporate Greed Globally.” Pp. 199-204 in Perspectives: Gender Studies, edited by R. Bredin and A. Keating. Bellevue: Coursewise Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madden, Mary McKlveen. 1997. “Strengthening Protection of Employees at Home and Abroad: The Extraterritorial Application of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and The Age Discrimination in Employment Act.” Hamline Law Review 20(739).

  • Nelson, Robert L. and William P. Bridges. 1999. Legalizing Gender Inequality: Courts, Markets, and Unequal Pay for Women in America. Cambridge England, New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolan, Justine and Michael Posner. 2000. “International Standards to Promote Labor Rights: The Role of the United States Government.” Columbia Business Law Review 529:1-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, Martha C. 2001. “Sex Equity, Liberty, and Privacy: A Comparative Approach to the Feminist Critique.” Fifth Annual Women's Law Symposium. University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Rourke, Dara. 2000. “Monitoring the Monitors: A Critique of PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) Labor Monitoring.” Unpublished Report, Department of Urban Studies and Planning, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

  • Poster, Winifred R. 1998. “Globalization, Gender and the Workplace: Women and Men in an American Multinational Corporation in India.” Journal of Developing Societies 14(1): 40-65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puttalingappa, M.T. 1993. A Guide to the Factories Act, 1948 and The Karnataka Factories Rules, 1969. Bangalore: Tripura Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, Robert T. 1983. “The New International Division of Labor and the U.S. Work Force: The Case of the Electronics Industry.” Pp. 39-69 in Women, Men, and the International Division of Labor, edited by J. Nash and M. P. Fernandez-Kelly. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • St. John, Mary Claire. 1994. “Extraterritorial Application of Title VII: The Foreign Compulsion Defense and Principles of International Comity.” Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 27(869).

  • UNIFEM. 2000. “Progress of the World's Women.” Biennial Report, United Nations Development Fund forWomen.

  • United Nations. 2001. “Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women.” gopher://gopher.un.org:70/00/ga/cedaw/convention Washington D.C.: Division for the Advancement of Women.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, Anne S. 2000. “CEDAW Optional Protocol Goes Into Force!!” IWTC Women's Global Net, October 2.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Poster, W.R. Dangerous Places and Nimble Fingers: Discourses of Gender Discrimination and Rights in Global Corporations. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society 15, 77–105 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011119917229

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011119917229

Navigation