Abstract
Despite the steady increase in the number of women with degrees in STEM fields, their presence in high- and medium-technology industries still remains limited in Italy. Moreover, women have primarily been contracted as self-employed suppliers and thus face greater risks related to wage stability and their eligibility for welfare services. Given this scenario, the actions taken in recent years by a series of women's associations founded to undermine the logic of exclusion in the high-tech sector hold particular interest. This chapter, starting with qualitative analysis through in-depth interviews with leaders of these associations alongside with more traditional union representatives, attempts to understand both what actions have been taken and how and if coordination with trade unions has taken place. The goal is to analyse if and to what extent these actions have allowed women to increase their presence and visibility within the sector. The results highlight that these forms of representation support women's empowerment but are less effective in improving working conditions and access to social protections. Trade union actions instead remain mainly focused on bargaining while companies seem less oriented towards involving unions on issues such as training or reshaping discriminatory practices.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Acker, J. (2006). Inequality regimes: Gender, class and race in organisations. Gender and Society, 20(4), 441–464.
Almalaurea. (2021). Timoteo, M., Bartolini, E., Binassi, S., Bonafè, E., Bregolin, G., Chiarello, M. A., & Tampellini, L. Consorzio Interuniversitario AlmaLaurea. XXIII Indagine. Report.
Alvarez, S., & Whitefield, P. (2012). Rethinking organising and leadership: Lessons from non-traditional, women-centred, labour campaigns in New York city. In Gendering and diversifying trade union leadership (pp. 178–196). Routledge.
Arksey, H., & Knight, P. T. (1999). Interviewing for social scientists. Sage.
Boxall, P. (2008). Trade union strategy. The Sage handbook of industrial relations. Sage.
Briskin, L. (1999). Autonomy, diversity, and integration: Union women’s separate organizing in North America and Western Europe in the context of restructuring and globalization. Women’s Studies International Forum, 22(5), 543–554.
Briskin, L. (2008). Cross-constituency organizing in Canadian unions. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 46(2), 221–247.
Britton, D. M. (2000). The epistemology of the gendered organization. Gender and Society, 14(3), 418–434.
Chung, H. (2020). Gender, flexibility stigma and the perceived negative consequences of flexible working in the UK. Social Indicators Research, 151(2), 521–545.
Cockburn, C. (1985). Machinery of dominance. Macmillan.
Colgan, F., & Ledwith, S. (2000). Diversity, identities and strategies of women trade union activists. Gender, Work & Organization, 7(4), 242–257.
Corbetta, P. (1999). Metodologia e tecniche della ricerca sociale. Il Mulino.
De Vita, L., & Giancola, O. (2017). Between education and employment: Women’s trajectories in STEM fields. Polis, 31(1), 45–72.
Della Porta, D. (2014). L’intervista qualitativa. Laterza & Figli Spa.
Dickens, L. (2000). Collective bargaining and the promotion of gender equality at work: Opportunities and challenges for trade unions. Transfer, 6(2), 193–208.
Elnaggar, A. (2008). Towards gender equal access to ICT. Information Technology for Development, 14(4), 280–293.
Hari, A. (2017). Who gets to ‘work hard, play hard’? Gendering the work–life balance rhetoric in Canadian tech companies. Gender, Work & Organization, 24(2), 99–114.
Hatfield, I. (2015). Self-employment in Europe. IPPR.
Holth, L., Bergman, A., & MacKenzie, R. (2017). Gender, availability and dual emancipation in the Swedish ICT sector. Work, Employment and Society, 31(2), 230–247.
Kelan, E. (2009). Performing gender at work. Springer.
Kirton, G. (2010). Work-life-balance: Attitudes and expectations of young black and minority ethnic graduates. In G. Healy, G. Kirton, & M. Noon (Eds.), Equality, inequalities and diversity. Palgrave Macmillan.
Kirton, G., & Healy, G. (2004). Shaping union and gender identities: A case study of women‐only trade union courses. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 42(2), 303–323.
Kirton, G., & Healy, G. (2012). ‘Lift as you rise’: Union women’s leadership talk. Human Relations, 65(8), 979–999.
Ledwith, S. (2006). Feminist praxis in a trade union gender project. Industrial Relations Journal, 37(4), 379–399.
Ledwith, S. (2012). Gender politics in trade unions. The representation of women between exclusion and inclusion. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 18(2), 185–199.
Lévesque, C., & Murray, G. (2010). Understanding union power: Resources and capabilities for renewing union capacity. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 16(3), 333–350.
Lewis, P., Benschop, Y., & Simpson, R. (2018). Postfeminism and organisation. Routledge.
Lott, Y., & Abendroth, A. K. (2020). The non-use of telework in an ideal worker culture: Why women perceive more cultural barriers. Community, Work & Family, 23(5), 593–611.
Marks, A., Chillas, S., Galloway, L., & Maclean, G. (2020). Confusion and collectivism in the ICT sector: Is FLOSS the answer? Economic and Industrial Democracy, 41(1), 167–188.
Milton, L. P. (2003). An identity perspective on the propensity of high-tech talent to unionize. Journal of Labor Research, 24(1), 31–53.
Munro, A. (2001). A feminist trade union agenda? The continued significance of class, gender and race. Gender, Work & Organization, 8(4), 454–471.
OECD. (2018). Bridging the digital gender divide include, upskill, innovate. http://www.oecd.org/going-digital/bridging-the-digital-gender-divide.pdf
Parker, J. (2006). Trade union women’s groups and their effects on union goals and strategies. Human Resource Management Journal, 16(4), 411–431.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Sage.
Rottenberg, C. (2014). The rise of neoliberal feminism. Cultural Studies, 28(3), 418–437.
Rubery, J., & Hebson, G. (2018). Applying a gender lens to employment relations: Revitalisation, resistance and risks. Journal of Industrial Relations, 60(3), 414–436.
Sandberg, S. (2013). Lean in: Women, work, and the will to lead. Alfred A. Knopf.
Schmuck, C. (2017). Women in STEM disciplines. Springer International Publishing.
Semenza, R., & Pichault, F. (Eds.). (2019). The challenges of self-employment in Europe. Edward Elgar Publishing.
She Figures. (2003). Women and science statistics and indicators. European Commission Directorate-General for Research. https://op.europa.eu/it/publication-detail/-/publication/31442d26-88c7-42db-a985-b8d843517089
She Figures. (2021). The path towards gender equality in research and innovation. European Commission Directorate-General for Research. https://ec.europa.eu/assets/rtd/shefigures2021/index.html
Smithson, J., & Stokoe, E. H. (2005). Discourses of work–life balance: Negotiating ‘genderblind’ terms in organizations. Gender, Work & Organization, 12(2), 147–168.
Tapia, M., Lee, T., & Filipovitch, M. (2017). Supra-union and intersectional organizing: An examination of two prominent cases in the low wage US restaurant industry. Journal of Industrial Relations, 59(4), 487–509.
Wajcman, J. (2000). Feminism facing industrial relations in Britain. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 38(2), 183–201.
Walby, S. (2011). Is the knowledge society gendered? Gender, Work and Organization, 18(1), 1–29.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
De Vita, L. (2022). Gender Representation in the High-Tech Sector in Italy: The Required Alliance Between Trade Unions and Women’s Associations. In: Rego, R., Costa, H.A. (eds) The Representation of Workers in the Digital Era . Dynamics of Virtual Work. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04652-0_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04652-0_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-04651-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-04652-0
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)