Skip to main content
Log in

Cost-Effective and Stochastic Dominance Approaches to Stochastic Pollution Control

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Most economic studies of pollution externalities focus on the relative efficiency or cost-effectiveness of alternative pollution control instruments. Much less attention has been paid to policy goals and objectives. However, a comprehensive pollution control strategy depends on all of these choices. This paper examines several efficiency properties of cost-effective pollution control strategies in a stochastic setting when economic damages from pollution are unknown. A number of policy goals are considered. In this setting and under a primal approach, it is found that certain stochastic dominance conditions must be satisfied for the strategies to exhibit desirable efficiency properties. A dual approach to cost-effective pollution control, which is based on a stochastic dominance objective, is also considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Baumol, W. J. and W. E. Oates (1988), The Theory of Environmental Policy. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beavis, B. and I. Dobbs (1987), ‘Firm Behaviour under Regulatory Control of Stochastic Environmental Wastes by Probabilistic Constraints’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 14, 112–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beavis, B. and M. Walker (1983), ‘Achieving Environmental Standards with Stochastic Discharges’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 10, 103–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braden, J. B. and K. Segerson (1993), ‘Information Problems in the Design of Nonpoint Source Pollution Policy’, in C. S. Russell and J. F. Shogren, eds., Theory, Modeling, and Experience in the Management of Nonpoint-Source Pollution. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrows, P. (1995), ‘Nonconvexities and the Theory of External Costs’, in D. W. Bromley, ed., The Handbook of Environmental Economics. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadar, J. and W. R. Russell (1969), ‘Rules for Ordering Uncertain Prospects’, American Economic Review 59, 25–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanley, N., J. F. Shogren and B. White (1997), Environmental Economics: In Theory and Practice. New York: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helfand, G. E. and B. W. House (1995), ‘Regulating Nonpoint Source Pollution Under Heterogeneous Conditions’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 77, 1024–1032.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirshleifer, J. and J. G. Riley (1992), The Analytics of Uncertainty and Information. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, H. and Z. Wiener (1998), ‘Stochastic Dominance and Prospect Dominance with Subjective Weighting Functions’, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 16, 147–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, A. L. (1984), Targeting Economic Incentives for Environmental Protection. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohanian, E. V. (1992), ‘New Approaches in Setting Drinking Water Standards’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 11, 321–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segerson, K. (1988), ‘Uncertainty and Incentives for Nonpoint Pollution Control’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 15, 87–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shortle, J. S. (1990), ‘The Allocative Efficiency Implications of Water Pollution Abatement Control Cost Comparisons’, Water Resources Research 26, 793–797.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shortle, J. S. (1987), ‘Allocative Implications of Comparisons Between the Marginal Costs of Point and Nonpoint Source Pollution Abatement’, Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 16, 17–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shortle, J. S. and D. G. Abler (1997), ‘Nonpoint Pollution’, in H. Folmer and T. Tietenberg, eds., International Yearbook of Environmental and Natural Resource Economics. Edward Elgar.

  • Shortle, J. S., R. D. Horan and D. G. Abler (1998), ‘Research Issues in Nonpoint Pollution Control’, Environmental and Resources Economics 11, 571–585.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tietenberg, T. (1995), ‘Tradeable Permits for Pollution Control when Emissions Location Matters: What Have We Learned?’, Environmental and Resource Economics 5, 95–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. EPA (1995), The State of the Chesapeake Bay.Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. EPA (1994), President Clinton's Clean Water Initiative: Analysis of Benefits and Costs. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. EPA (1993), Water Quality Standards Handbook, Second Edition. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. EPA and U.S.D.A. (1998), Clean Water Action Plan: Restoring and Protecting America's Waters. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency EPA-840-R-98-001.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Horan, R.D. Cost-Effective and Stochastic Dominance Approaches to Stochastic Pollution Control. Environmental and Resource Economics 18, 373–389 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011113726358

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011113726358

Navigation