Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Interpretation of Ambiguous Interoceptive Stimuli in Panic Disorder and Nonclinical Panic

  • Published:
Cognitive Therapy and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cognitive bias in the misinterpretation of ambiguous interoceptive stimuli has been demonstrated in panic disorder. This study investigated whether this cognitive bias also occurs in people with nonclinical panic who are at risk of developing panic disorder. The responses of 25 people with nonclinical panic were compared to those of 20 people with panic disorder and 69 nonpanic controls on a measure of interpretive bias, the Brief Body Sensations Interpretation Questionnaire. There was evidence for interpretive cognitive bias for ambiguous interoceptive stimuli among the nonclinical panickers which did not differ from that of the people with panic disorder, but which differed from the nonpanic controls. High anxiety sensitivity predicted interpretive bias toward both interoceptive and external stimuli. Results therefore suggest that interpretive cognitive bias for ambiguous interoceptive stimuli may be a risk factor for the development of panic disorder.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

  • Barlow, D. H. (1988). Anxiety and its disorders: The nature and treatment of anxiety and panic. New York: Guildford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, D. H. (1991). Disorders of emotion. Psychological Inquiry, 2, 58–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. A., DiNardo, P. A., & Barlow, D. H. (1994). Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for DSMIV. New York: Graywind.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, G., & Mathews, A. (1983). Cognitive processes in anxiety. Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy, 5, 51–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D. M. (1988). A cognitive model of panic attacks. In S. Rachman & J. D. Maser (Eds.). Panic: Psychological perspectives (pp. 71–89). Hillside, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D. M., Salkovskis, P. M., Breitholtz, E., Westling, B. E., Ost, L.-G., Koehler, K. A., Jeavons, A., & Gelder, M. (1997). Misinterpretation of body sensations in panic disorder. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 203–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coakes, S. J., & Steed, L. G. (1996). SPSS for windows: Analysis without anguish. Brisbane, Australia: Jacaranda Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, B. J., Borger, S. C., & Enns, M. W. (1999). Anxiety sensitivity and emotional disorders: Psychometric studies and their theoretical implications. In S. Taylor (Ed.), Anxiety sensitivity: Theory, research and treatment of the fear of anxiety. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, B. J., Endler, N. S., & Norton, R. G. (1994). Levels of “nonclinical panic.” Journal of Behaviour Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 25, 35–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, B. J., Endler, N. S., & Swinson, R. P. (1995). Anxiety sensitivity and panic attack symptomatology. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 33, 833–836.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, B. J., Endler, N. S., Swinson, R. P., & Norton, G. R. (1991). Situations and specific coping strategies associated with clinical and nonclinical panic attacks. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 30, 67–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, B. J., Parker, J. D. A., & Swinson, R. P. (1996). Anxiety sensitivity: Confirmatory evidence for a multidimensional construct. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 34, 591–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehlers, A. (1989). Interaction of psychological and physiological factors in panic attacks. In P. Lovibond & P. Wilson (Eds.), Clinical and abnormal psychology (pp. 1–14). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehlers, A. (1995). A 1 year prospective study of panic attacks: Clinical course and factors associated with maintenance. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 104, 164–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, J. M., Richards, J. C., Dziadosz, T., & Swindell, A. (1993). Misinterpretation of ambiguous stimuli in panic disorder. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 17, 235–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamieniecki, G. W., Wade, T., & Tsourtos, G. (1997). Interpretive bias for benign sensations in panic disorder with agoraphobia. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 11, 141–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keppel, G. (1991). Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau, J. J., Calamari, J. E., & Waraczynski, M. (1996). Panic attack symptomatology and anxiety sensitivity in adolescents. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 10, 355–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilienfield, S. O., Turner, S. M., & Jacob, R. G. (1993). Anxiety sensitivity: An examination of theoretical and methodological issues. Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy, 15, 147–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maller, R. G., & Reiss, S. (1987). A behavioural validation of the Anxiety Sensitivity Index. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 1, 265–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maller, R. G., & Reiss, S. (1992). Anxiety sensitivity in 1984 and panic attacks in 1987. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 6, 241–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNally, R. J. (1990). Psychological approaches to panic disorder: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 403–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNally, R. J. (1994). Panic disorder: A critical analysis. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNally, R. J., & Foa, E. B. (1987). Cognition and agoraphobia: Bias in the interpretation of threat. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 11, 567–581.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNally, R. J., Hornig, C. D., Hoffman, E. C., & Han, E. M. (1999). Anxiety sensitivity and cognitive biases for threat. Behavior Therapy, 30, 51–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R. A., & Helibronner, R. L. (1987). The Anxiety Sensitivity Index: Construct validity and factor analytic structure. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 1, 117–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapee, R. M., Ancis, J. R., & Barlow, D. H. (1988). Emotional reactions to physiological sensations: Panic disorder patients and nonclinical subjects. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 29, 265–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, S. (1991). Expectancy theory of fear, anxiety, and panic. Clinical Psychology Review, 11, 141–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, S., Peterson, R. A., Gursky, D. M., & McNally, R. J. (1986). Anxiety sensitivity, anxiety frequency and the prediction of fearfulness. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 24, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, J. C., Edgar, L., & Gibbon, P. (1996). Cardiac acuity in panic disorder. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 20, 361–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salkovskis, P. M., Clark, D. M., & Gelder, M. G. (1996). Cognition- behaviour links in the persistence of panic. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 34, 453–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, N. B., Lerew, D.R., & Jackson, R. J. (1997). he role of anxiety sensitivity in the pathogenesis of panic: Prospective evaluation of spontaneous panic attacks during acute stress. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 106, 355–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, N. B., Lerew, D. R., & Jackson, R. J. (1999). Prospective evaluation of anxiety sensitivity in the pathogenesis of panic: Replication and extension. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 108,532–537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitzer, R. L., Williams, J. B. W., Kroenke, K., Linzer, M., & DeGruy, F. V., III. (1994). Utility of a new procedure for diagnosing mental disorders in primary care: The Prime-MD 1000 Study. Journal of the American Medical Association, 272, 1749.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, S. H., Knize, K., & Phil, R. O. (1992). Anxiety sensitivity and dependency in clinical and nonclinical panickers and controls. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 6, 119–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S., & Cox, B. J. (1998). An expanded Anxiety Sensitivity Index: Evidence for a hierarchic structure in a clinical sample. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 12, 463–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S., Koch, W. J., & McNally, R. J. (1992). How does anxiety sensitivity vary across the anxiety disorders? Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 6, 249–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Telch, M. J., Lucas, J. A., & Nelson, P. (1989). Nonclinical panic in college students: An investigation of prevalence and symptomatology. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 98, 300–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, K. G., Sandler, L. S., Asmundsen, G. J. G., Ediger, J. M., Larsen, D. K., & Walker, J. R. (1992). Panic attacks in the nonclinical population: An empirical approach to case identification. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 101, 460–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinbarg, R. E., Barlow, D. H., & Brown, T. A. (1997). The hierarchical structure and general factor saturation of the Anxiety Sensitivity Index: Evidence and implications. Psychological Assessment, 9, 277–284.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Ballarat, Victoria, Australia

    Jeffrey C. Richards

  2. University of Ballarat, Victoria, Australia

    David W. Austin & Marlies E. Alvarenga

Authors
  1. Jeffrey C. Richards
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David W. Austin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Marlies E. Alvarenga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Richards, J.C., Austin, D.W. & Alvarenga, M.E. Interpretation of Ambiguous Interoceptive Stimuli in Panic Disorder and Nonclinical Panic. Cognitive Therapy and Research 25, 235–246 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010783427196

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010783427196

Search

Navigation