Abstract
The aim of the study was to develop a sampling method aimed at individual sampling of mercury vapor and subsequent individualexposure assessment of the worker. Hopcalite available fromInowrocławskie Zakłady Chemiczne (in Poland) was founduseful for mercury vapor sampling in active and passive individual samplers. However the sampling rate determined forpassive sampler in steady-state laboratory chamber cannot be usedunder fluctuating conditions of mercury vapor concentration andair movement typical for field measurement. In order to check comparativeness of passive and active sampling methods, sampleswere taken in the same time and individual samplers fixed toworker's clothes were used. Mercury vapor concentration wasmeasured at two chloralkali industries in Poland and the resultswere presented. Excessive exposure in both industries wasconfirmed by finding elevated mercury concentration in urinesamples from the workers.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Mniszek, W., Zielonka, U. and Masny, N.: 1991, ‘Zastosowanie hopkalitu jako sorbentu pzy oznaczaniu rt eci w powietrzu atmosferycznym', Chem. Anal. 36, 483–490.
Order of Minister of Labor and Social Policy in Polish Official Legislation Gazette: 1994, Dz U.37.
Order of Minister of Labor and Social Policy in Polish Official Legislation Gazette: 1998, Dz.U.98.79.513.
OSHA: 1991, ‘Occupational Safety and Hygiene Agency in U.S.A., Mercury vapor in workplace atmospheres', Method Number ID-140.
Polish Standard: 1972, PN-72/Z-04040.
Polish Standard: 1981, PN-81/Z-04133.01.
Polish. Standard: 1991, PN-90/Z-04133/06.
Health-and-Safety-Executive-(UK): 1987, ‘Mercury vapor in air. Method using diffusive samplers, qualitative on-site colorimetric analysis and quantitative cold-vapor atomic-absorption spectrometry in the laboratory', Technical-Report, Methods Determ. Hazard. Subst, MDHS 58.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mniszek, W. Exposure Assessment to Mercury Vapor in Chloralkali Industry. Environ Monit Assess 68, 197–207 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010704712646
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010704712646