Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impacts of Mercury Pollution Controls on Atmospheric Mercury Concentration and Occupational Mercury Exposure in a Hospital

  • Published:
Biological Trace Element Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mercury (Hg) and Hg-containing products are used in a wide range of settings in hospitals. Hg pollution control measures were carried out in the pediatric ward of a hospital to decrease the possibility of Hg pollution occurring and to decrease occupational Hg exposure. Total gaseous Hg (TGM) concentrations in the pediatric ward and hair and urine Hg concentrations for the pediatric staff were determined before and after the Hg pollution control measures had been implemented. A questionnaire survey performed indicated that the pediatric staff had little understanding of Hg pollution and that appropriate disposal techniques were not always used after Hg leakage. TGM concentrations in the pediatric ward and urine Hg (UHg) concentrations for the pediatric staff were 25.7 and 22.2 % lower, respectively, after the Hg pollution control measures had been implemented than before, which indicated that the control measures were effective. However, TGM concentrations in the pediatric ward remained significantly higher than background concentrations and UHg concentrations for the pediatric staff were remained significantly higher than the concentrations in control group, indicating continued existence of certain Hg pollution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. UNEP (2013) Global Mercury Assessment 2013: Sources, emissions, releases and environmental transport. United Nations Environment Programme, Chemicals Branch, Geneva

  2. Clarkson TW (2002) The three modern faces of mercury. Environ Health Perspect 110(S1):11–23

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mergler D, Anderson AH, Chan HM, Mahaffey RK, Murray M, Sakamoto M, Stern HA (2007) Methylmercury exposure and health effects in humans: a worldwide concern. AMBIO 36:3–11

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. WHO (1991) Environmental health criteria 118—inorganic mercury. World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  5. Clarkson TW, Hursch JB, Sager PR, Syversen TLM (1988) Mercury. In: Clarkson TW, Friberg L, Nordberg GF, Sager PR (eds) Biological monitoring of toxic metals. Plenum, New York, pp 199–246

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Barregard L (1993) Biological monitoring of exposure to mercury vapor. Scan J Work Environ Health 19:45–49

    Google Scholar 

  7. USEPA (1997) Mercury study report to the Congress, Vol. V: Health effects of mercury and mercury compounds, EPA 452/R-97/003. USEPA, Washington

  8. ATSDR (1999) toxicological profile for mercury. Agency for toxic substances and disease registry, Atlanta

  9. Wang S, Zhang L, Wang L, Wu Q, Wang F, Hao J (2014) A review of atmospheric mercury emissions, pollution and control in China. Front Environ Sci Eng 8:631–649

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sun Y, Chen Y, Lan H, Liu L, Fang L (2013) Study on pollution sources, cause of mercury pollution and its control technical roadmap in China. Environ Chem 6:937–942

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zeitz P, Orr M, Kaye W (2002) Public health consequences of mercury spills: hazardous substances emergency events surveillance system, 1993–1998. Environ Health Perspect 110:129–132

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang J, Zhang Z, Han Y (2010) Study on pollution emission reduction countermeasure about hospital mercury-bearing waste. Environ Sci Manag 35:10–13

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cornblath DR, Sumner AJ (1982) Neurophysiological and neuropsychological function in mercury-exposed dentists. Lancet 1:1147–1150

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ngim CH, Foo SC, Boey KW, Jeyaratnam J (1992) Chronic neurobehavioral effects of elemental mercury in dentists. Br J Ind Med 49(11):782–90

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nicolae A, Ames H, Quiñonez C (2013) Dental amalgam and urinary mercury concentrations: a descriptive study. BMC Oral Health 13:44

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Warwick R, O’Connor A, Lamey B (2013) Mercury vapor exposure during dental student training in amalgam removal. J Occup Med Toxicol 8:27–34

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pei X, Ran Q, Ding H (2007) Investigation to the recognition and prevention of hydrargyria in the clinical nurse. West China Med J 22:893–894

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yan H, Feng X, Li Z, Jiang H, He T (2005) A methodological development in measuring total mercury in fish using semi-closed digestion and CVAFS. Earth Environ 33:89–92

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. National Research Council (2000) Toxicological effects of methylmercury. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  20. Li P, Feng X, Qiu G, Wan Q (2011) Hair can be a good biomarker of occupational exposure to mercury vapor: simulated experiments and field data analysis. Sci Total Environ 409:4484–4488

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Feng X, Shang L, Wang S, Tang S, Zheng W (2004) Temporal variation of total gaseous mercury in the air of Guiyang, China. J Geophys Res 109:D03303. doi:10.1029/2003JD004159

    Google Scholar 

  22. MOH (1996) GB16227-1996, Health standard for element mercury vapor in the air of workplace. Ministry of Health

  23. ACGIH (1999) TLVs and BEIs: Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents, Biological Exposure Indices. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, Cincinnati

  24. SEPA (2012) GB3095-2012, Ambient Air Quality Standard. State Environmental Protection Agency

  25. USEPA (1999) Integrated risk information system (IRIS) on elemental mercury. National center for environmental assessment. Office of Research and Development, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  26. Prokopowicz A, Mniszek W (2005) Mercury vapor determination in hospitals. Environ Monit Assess 104:147–154

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. UNIDO (2003) Protocols for environmental and health assessment of mercury released by artisanal and small-scale gold miners (ASM). United Nations Industrial Development Organization, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41373135, 41120134005) and Research Foundation of Affiliated Hospital of Guiyang Medical University (GYHLB201205).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ping Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, P., Yang, Y. & Xiong, W. Impacts of Mercury Pollution Controls on Atmospheric Mercury Concentration and Occupational Mercury Exposure in a Hospital. Biol Trace Elem Res 168, 330–334 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-015-0391-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-015-0391-7

Keywords

Navigation