Abstract
Background: Lossless or lossy compression of coronary angiogram data can reduce the enormous amounts of data generated by coronary angiographic imaging. The recent International Study of Angiographic Data Compression (ISAC) assessed the clinical viability of lossy Joint Photographic Expert Group (JPEG) compression but was unable to resolve two related questions: (A) the performance of lossless modes of compression in coronary angiography and (B) the performance of newer lossy wavelet algorithms. This present study seeks to supply some of this information. Methods: The performance of several lossless image compression methods was measured in the same set of images as used in the ISAC study. For the assessment of the relative image quality of lossy JPEG and wavelet compression, the observers ranked the perceived image quality of computer-generated coronary angiograms compressed with wavelet compression relative to the same images with JPEG compression. This ranking allowed the matching of compression ratios for wavelet compression with the clinically viable compression ratios for the JPEG method as obtained in the ISAC study. Results: The best lossless compression scheme (LOCO-I) offered a mean compression ratio (CR) of 3.80:1. The quality of images compressed with the lossy wavelet-based method at CR = 10:1 and 20:1 was comparable to JPEG compression at CR = 6:1 and 10:1, respectively. Conclusion: The study has shown that lossless compression can exceed the CR of 2:1 usually quoted. For lossy compression, the range of clinically viable compression ratios can probably be extended by 50 to 100% when applying wavelet compression algorithms as compared to JPEG compression. These results can motivate a larger clinical study.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ACC/ACR/NEMA Ad Hoc Group, Nissen SE, Goldburgh M. ACC, ACR and industry develop standard for digital transfer of angiographic images. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 25: 800-820.
Nissen SEN, Hirshfield JW, Simon R. Introduction and background: the international angiographic compression study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 35: 1367-1369.
Rigolin VH, Robiolio PA, Spero LA, et al. Lossy JPEG compression of digital coronary angiograms does not effect visual or quantitative assessment of coronary stenosis severity. Am J Cardiol 1996; 78: 131-135.
Baker WA, Hearne SE, Spero LA, et al. Lossy (15:1) JPEG compression of digital coronary angiograms does not limit detection of subtle morphological features. Circulation 1997; 96: 1157-1164.
Koning G, van Meurs BA, Haas H, Reiber JHC. Effects of data compression on quantitative coronary measurements. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1995; 34: 175-185.
Koning G, Beretta P, Zwart P, Hekking E, Reiber JHC. Effect of lossy data compression on quantitative coronary measurements. Int J Card Imaging 1997; 13: 261-270.
Kirkeeide R, Beretta P, Smalling RW, Anderson HV, Schroth G, Gould KL. Diagnostic content is uneffected by 12:1 image compression. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 29 Abstr. Suppl. A: 35 (abstract).
Fritsch JP, Negwer F, Renneisen U, Brennecke R, Meyer J. Visual and quantitative analysis of coronary angiograms after irreversible data compression. Eur Heart J 1994; 15 Abstr. Suppl.: 46.
Karson TH, DeFranco A, Evans DJ, et al. Replacement of cine film by digital angiography: clinical evaluation of a real-time optical storage system. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993; 2156A (abstr).
Silber S, Dörr R, Zindler G, Mühling H, Diebel T. Impact of various compression rates on interpretation of digital coronary angiograms. Int J Cardiol 1997; 60: 195-200.
Kerensky RA, Cusma JT, Kubilis P, et al. American College of Cardiology/European Society of Cardiology international study of angiographic data compression Phase I: the effect of lossy data compression on recognition of diagnostic features in digital coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 35: 1370-1379.
Tuinenburg JC, Koning G, Hekking E, et al. American College of Cardiology/European Society of Cardiology international study of angiographic data compression Phase II: the effect of varying JPEG compression on the quantitative assessment of the degree of stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 35: 1380-1387.
Brennecke R, Bürgel U, Simon R, et al. American College of Cardiology/European Society of Cardiology international study of angiographic data compression Phase III: measurement of image quality differences at varying levels of data compression. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 35: 1388-1397.
Said A, Pearlman WA. Reversible image compression via multiresolution representation and predictice coding. Proc SPIE, 1993; 2094: 664-674.
Said A, Pearlman WA. A new and efficient image codec based on set partitioning in hierarchical trees. IEEE Trans Circuits Video Techn 1996; 6: 1-15.
Kivijärvi J, Ojala T, Kaukoranta T, et al. A comparison of lossless compression methods for medical images. Computerized Med Imaging Graphics 1998; 22: 323-339.
U. Bürgel. Entwicklung und Erprobung von visuellen und computergestützten Massen der Bildqualität [Dissertation]. Germany: Univ of Mainz, 2000.
Brennecke R, Hahne HJ, Bürsch JH, Heintzen PH. Optimization of generalized subtraction operations. In: Heintzen PH, Brennecke R editors. Digital Imaging in Cardiovascular Radiology. Stuttgart, New York: Thieme, 1983: 67-80.
Pennebecker WB, Mitchell JL. JPEG Still Image Compression Standard. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1993: 78.
Weinberger MJ, Seroussi G, Sapiro G. LOCO-I: A low complexity, context based image compression algorithm. Proc IEEE data compression conference. IEEE Computer Soc Press 1996: 140-149.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brennecke, R., Bürgel, U., Rippin, G. et al. Comparison of image compression viability for lossy and lossless JPEG and Wavelet data reduction in coronary angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 17, 1–12 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010644318298
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010644318298