Abstract
Wastewater treatment using laboratory scale waste stabilisation ponds enriched with activated sludge was studied. After enrichment, the efficiency of these ponds under high organic loading rates (i.e., up to 2800kg CODha−1day−1) reached a maximum COD removal rate of 970kg CODha−1day−1, which is from 2 to 10 times more than commonly reported values, and suggests that enrichment is an effective method to improve stabilisation ponds.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Eckenfelder WW, Ford DL (1970) Water Pollution Control: Experimental Procedures for Process Design. Austin: Jenkins Publishing Co, The Pemberton Press.
Grau P (1996) Low cost wastewater treatment. Water Sci. Technol. 33: 39–46.
Pearson HW (1996) Expanding the horizons of pond technology and application in an environmentally conscious world. Water Sci. Technol. 33: 1–9.
Polprasert C, Agarwalla BK (1994) A facultative pond model incorporating biofilm activity. Water Environ. Res. 66: 725–732.
Polprasert C, Sookhanich S (1995) Upgrading of facultative ponds to treat a toxic organic wastewater. Water Sci. Technol. 31: 201–210.
Shin HK, Polprasert C (1987) Attached-growth waste stabilisation ponds treatment evaluation. Water Sci. Technol. 19: 229–235.
Soler A, Torrella F, Sáez J, Martínez I, Nicolás J, Llorens M, Torres J (1995) Performance of two municipal sewage stabilisation pond systems with high and low loading in south-eastern Spain. Water Sci. Technol. 31: 81–90.
Veenstra S, Al-Nozaily FA, Alaerts GJ (1995) Purple non-sulphur bacteria and their influence on waste stabilisation pond performance in the Yemen Republic. Water Sci. Technol. 31: 141–149.
Zhao Q, Wang B (1996) Evaluation on a pilot-scale attached-growth pond system treating domestic wastewater. Water Res. 30: 242–245.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Avelar, F., Martínez-Pereda, P., Thalasso, F. et al. Upgrading of facultative waste stabilisation ponds under high organic load. Biotechnology Letters 23, 1115–1118 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010507832395
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010507832395