Skip to main content
Log in

Al uptake kinetics in roots of Melastoma malabathricum L. – an Al accumulator plant

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The mechanism of Al uptake in melastoma (Melastoma malabathricum L.), which accumulates Al in excess of 10 000 mg kg−1 in its leaves and roots, was investigated. Al uptake kinetics in excised melastoma roots showed a biphasic pattern, with an initial rapid phase followed by a slow phase. It was indicated that Al uptake in the excised roots occurs mostly through passive accumulation in the apoplast. On the other hand, Al uptake rate in roots of whole melastoma plant was almost double that in excised roots. The difference of Al uptake rate between excised roots and whole plant seems to be due to transpiration-depended Al uptake. Results from a long-term experiment showed that different characteristics of Al accumulation between melastoma and barley was caused by the difference in capacity to retain Al in root symplast, rather than by the difference in uptake rate into symplast. Concentrations of oxalate in root symplastic and apoplastic fractions, and total oxalate in shoots and roots, did not change greatly with time of Al exposure compared to Al concentration, although oxalate is considered as a main Al ligand in tissue of melastoma. On the other hand, oxalate exudation to root apoplast was induced within 24 h of Al exposure; the role of such exudation was discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aniol A 1984 Induction of aluminum tolerance in wheat seedlings by low doses of aluminum in the nutrient solution. Plant Physiol. 75, 551–555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archambault D J, Zhang G and Taylor G J 1996 A comparison of the kinetics of aluminum (Al) uptake and distribution in roots of wheat (Triticum aestivum) using different aluminum sources. A revision of the operational definition of symplastic Al. Physiol. Plant. 98, 578–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chenery E M 1948 Aluminium in plants and its relation to plant pigments. Ann. Bot. N. S. 12, 121–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Lima M L and Copeland L 1994 The effect of aluminium on respiration of wheat roots. Physiol. Plant. 90, 51–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delhaize E, Craig S, Beaton C D, Bennet R J, Jagadish V C and Randall P J 1993a Aluminium tolerance in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). I. Uptake and distribution of aluminium in root apices. Plant Physiol. 103, 685–693.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delhaize E, Ryan P R and Randall P J 1993b Aluminium tolerance in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). II. Aluminium-stimulated excretion of malic acid from root apices. Plant Physiol. 103, 695–702.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foy C D, Chaney R L and White M C 1978 The physiology of metal toxicity in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 29, 511–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haridasan M 1988 Performance of Miconia albicans (SW.) Triana, an aluminum accumulating species, in acidic and calcareous soils. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 19, 1091–1103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huett D O and Menary R C 1979 Aluminium uptake by excised roots of cabbage, lettuce and kikuyu grass. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 6, 643–653.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones D L and Kochian L V 1995 Aluminum inhibition of the inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate signal transduction pathway in wheat roots: A role in aluminum toxicity? Plant Cell 7, 1913–1922.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keltjens W G 1995 Magnesium uptake by Al-stressed maize plants with special emphasis on cation interactions at root exchange sites. Plant Soil 171, 141–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kochian L V 1995 Cellular mechanisms of aluminum toxicity and resistance in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 46, 237–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konishi S, Miyamoto S and Taki T 1985 Stimulatory effects of aluminum on tea plants grown under low and high phosphorus supply. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 31, 361–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazof D B, Goldsmith J G, Rufty T W and Linton R W 1994 Rapid uptake of aluminum into cells of intact soybean root tips. Plant Physiol. 106, 1107–1114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo H M, Watanabe T, Shinano T and Tadano T 1999 Comparison of aluminium tolerance and phosphate absorption between rape (Brassica napus L.) and tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill.) in relation to organic acid exudation. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 45, 897–907.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma J F, Hiradate S, Nomoto K, Iwashita T and Matsumoto H 1997a Internal detoxification mechanism of Al in hydrangea. Plant Physiol. 113, 1033–1039.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma J F, Zheng S J, Matsumoto H and Hiradate S 1997b Detoxifying aluminium with buckwheat. Nature 390, 569–570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsumoto H, Hirasawa E, Torikai H and Takahashi E 1976a Localization of absorbed aluminium in pea root and its binding to nucleic acids. Plant Cell Physiol. 17, 127–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsumoto H, Hirasawa E, Morimura S and Takahashi E 1976b Localization of aluminium in tea leaves. Plant Cell Physiol. 17, 627–631.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald-Stephens J L and Taylor G J 1995 Kinetics of aluminum uptake by cell suspensions of Phaseolus vulgaris L. J. Plant Physiol. 145, 327–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mugwira L M and Elgawhary S M 1979 Aluminium accumulation and tolerance of triticale and wheat in relation to root cation exchange capacity. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 43, 736–740.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osaki M, Watanabe T and Tadano T 1997 Beneficial effect of aluminum on growth of plants adapted to low pH soils. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 43, 551–563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rengel Z 1996 Tansley review No. 89. Uptake of aluminium by plant cells. New Phytol. 134, 389–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rengel Z and Reid R J 1997 Uptake of Al across the plasma membrane of plant cells. Plant Soil 192, 31–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy A K, Sharma A and Talukder G 1988 Some aspects of aluminum toxicity in plants. Bot. Rev. 154, 145–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tice K R, Parker D R and DeMason D A 1992 Operationally defined apoplastic and symplastic aluminum fractions in root tips of aluminum-intoxicated wheat. Plant Physiol. 100, 309–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitorello V A and Haug A 1996 Short-term aluminium uptake by tobacco cells: Growth dependence and evidence for internalization in a discrete peripheral region. Physiol. Plant. 97, 536–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe T, Osaki M and Tadano T 1997 Aluminum-induced growth stimulation in relation to calcium, magnesium and silicate nutrition in Melastoma malabathricum L. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 43, 827–837.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe T, Osaki m, Yoshihara T and Tadano T 1998a Distribution and chemical speciation of aluminum in the Al accumulator plant, Melastoma malabathricum L. Plant Soil 201, 165–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe T, Osaki M and Tadano T 1998b Effects of nitrogen source and aluminum on growth of tropical tree seedlings adapted to low pH soils. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 44, 655–666.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang G and Taylor G J 1989 Kinetics of aluminum uptake by excised roots of aluminum-tolerant and aluminum-sensitive cultivars of Triticum aestivum L. Plant Physiol. 91, 1094–1099.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang G and Taylor G J 1990 Kinetics of aluminum uptake in Triticum aestivum L. Plant Physiol. 94, 577–584.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng S J, Ma J F and Matsumoto H 1998 High aluminum resistance in buckwheat. I. Al-induced specific secretion of oxalic acid from root tips. Plant Physiol. 117, 745–751. Section editor: Z. Rengel

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Watanabe, T., Osaki, M. & Tadano, T. Al uptake kinetics in roots of Melastoma malabathricum L. – an Al accumulator plant. Plant and Soil 231, 283–291 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010365607325

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010365607325

Navigation