Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Note on Soil Erosion and Its Environmental Consequences in the United States

  • Published:
Water, Air, and Soil Pollution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Soil erosion has both on-farm and off-farm impacts. Reduction ofsoil depth can impair the land's productivity, and the transportof sediments can degrade streams, lakes, and estuaries. Since1933, soil conservation policies have existed in the UnitedStates. Originally they focused on the on-farm benefits ofkeeping soil on the land and increasing net farm income.Beginning in the 1980s, however, policy goals increasinglyincluded reductions in off-site impacts of erosion. As aconsequence of conservation efforts associated with explicitU.S. government policies, total soil erosion between 1982 and1992 was reduced by 32% and the sheet and rill erosion ratefell from an average of 4.1 tons per acre per year in 1982 to 3.1 tons per acre in 1992. Wind erosion rate fell from anaverage of 3.3 tons per acre per year to 2.4 tons per acre peryear over the same period. Still, soil erosion is imposingsubstantial social costs. These costs are estimated to be about$37.6 billion annually. To further reduce soil erosion andthereby mitigate its social costs, there are a number of policyoptions available to induce farmers to adopt conservationpractices including education and technical assistance,financial assistance, research and development, land retirement,and regulation and taxes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barker, J., Baumgardner, G., Turner, D. and Lee, J.: 1996, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 51, 340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosch, D., Cook, Z. and Fuglie, K.: 1995, Review of Agricultural Economics 17, 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caswell, M. and Schoemaker, R.: 1993, Adoption of Pest Management Strategies Under Varying Environmental Conditions, Technical Bulletin 1827, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosswhite, W. and Sandretto, C.: 1991, 'Trends in Resource Protection Policies in Agriculture',Agricultural Resources: Cropland, Water, and Conservation Situation and Outlook Report, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobbs, T., Bischoff, J., Henning, L. and Pflueger, B.: 1995, 'Case Study of the Potential Economic and Environmental Effects of the Water Quality Incentive Program and the Integrated Crop Management Program: Preliminary Findings', paper presented at annual meeting of the Great Plains Economics Committee, Great Plains Agricultural Council, Kansas City, MO.

  • Dudal, R.: 1982, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 37, 345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, G. and Dabney, S.: 1995, 'Agricultural Tillage Systems: Water Erosion and Sedimentation', Farming for a Better Environment, Soil and Water Conservation Society, Ankeny, IA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franzmeier, D.: 1990, 'Soil Landscapes ad Erosion Processes', in W. Larson, G. Foster, R. Allmaras and C. Smith (eds.), Proceedings of Soil Erosion and Productivity Workshop, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gebhart, D., Johnson, H., Mayeux, H. and Polley, H.: 1994, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 49, 488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hefferman, W.: 1984, 'Assumptions of the Adoption/Diffusion Model and Soil Conservation', in B. English, J. Maetzold, B. Holding, and E. Heady(eds.), Agricultural Technology and Resource Conservation, Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heimlich, R.: 1991, 'Soil Erosion and Conservation Policies in the United States', in N. Hanley(ed.), Farming and the Countryside: An Economic Analysis of External Costs and Benefits, CAB International Publishers, Miami, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, B.: 1987, Legal Authorities for Federal (USDA), State, and Local Soil and Water Conservation Activities: Background for the Second RCA Appraisal, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huzsar, P. and Piper, S.: 1986, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 41, 414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kneese, A. and Bower, B.: 1968, 'Standards, Charges, and Equity', Managing Water Quality: Economics, Technology, Institutions, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimire, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lal, R.: 1990, Advances in Soil Science 11, 129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Libby, L.: 1982, 'Interaction of RCA with State and Local Conservation Programs', in H. Halcrow, E. Heady, and M. Cotner(eds.), Soil Conservation Policies Institutions, and Incentives, Soil Conservation Society of America, Ankeny, IA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindstrom, M., Schumacher, T., Jones, A. and Gantzer, C.: 1992, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 47, 491.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, A.: 1994, Early American Soil Conservationist, Miscellaneous Publication Number 449, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magleby, R., Sandretto, C., and Orborn, T.: 1995, Soil Erosion and Conservation in the United States, AIB-718, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Missouri Management Systems Evaluation Area: 1995, Farming Systems Water Quality Report, Research and Education Report, Missouri MSEA.

  • National Research Council: 1993, Soil and Water Quality, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, F. and Schertz, L.: 1996, Provisions of the Federal Agriculture Improvement and Reform Act of 1996, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, P.: 1991, 'Why Farmers Adopt Production Technology', in Crop Residue Management for Conservation, Proceedings of a National Conference, Soil and Water Conservation Society, Ankeny, IA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, P. and O'Keefe, G.: 1995, 'Farmers and Water Quality: Local Answers to Local Issues', Draft Report submitted to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Technology Assessment: 1990, Beneath the Bottom Line: Agricultural Approaches to Reduce Agrichemical Contamination of Groundwater, OTA-F-418, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborn, T.: 1996, 'Conservation', Provisions of the Federal Agricultural Improvement Act of 1996, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piper, S. and Lee, L.: 1989, Estimating the Offsite Household Damage from Wind Erosion in the Western United States, Staff Report 8926, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, W.: 1982, 'History of Soil Conservation, Institutions and Incentives', Soil Conservation Policies, Institutions, and Incentives, Soil Conservation Society of America, Ankeny, IA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichelderfer, K.: 1990, 'Land Steward or Polluters? The Treatment of Farmers in the Evaluation of Environmental and Agricultural Policy', a paper presented at the conference Is Environmental Quality Good for Business?, Washington DC.

  • Ribaudo, M.: 1989, Water Quality Benefits from the Conservation Reserve Program, AER-606, Economic Research Service U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribaudo, M., Colacicco, D., Langner, L., Piper, S. and Schaible, G.: 1990, Natural Resources and Users Benefit from the Conservation Reserve program, AER-627, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribaudo, M. and Hellerstein, D.: 1992, Estimating Water Quality Benefits: Theoretical and Methodological Issues, TB-1808, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saha, A., Love, H. A. and Schwart, R.: 1994, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 76, 836.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strohbehn, R.: 1986, An Economic Analysis of USDA Erosion Control Programs: A New Perspective, AER-560, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment: 1990, Beneath the Bottom Line: Agricultural Approaches to Reduce Agrichemical Contamination of groundwater, OTA-F-418, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uri, N.: 1999, Conservation Tillage in U.S. Agriculture: Environmental, Economic, and Policy Issues, The Haworth Press, Inc., Binghamton, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Es, J.: 1984, 'Dilemmas in the Soil and Water Conservation Behavior of Farmers', in B. English, J., Maetzold, B. Holding, and E. Heady (eds.), Agricultural Technology and Resource Conservation, Iowa State University Press, Ames.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zison, S., Haven, K. and Mills, W.: 1977, Water Quality Assessment: A Screening Method for Nondesignated 208 Areas, Environmental Protection Agency, Athens, GA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC, U.S.A

    Noel D. Uri

Authors
  1. Noel D. Uri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Uri, N.D. A Note on Soil Erosion and Its Environmental Consequences in the United States. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution 129, 181–197 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010335031525

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010335031525

Search

Navigation