Skip to main content
Log in

A `Public Good' Test to Guide the Transformation of Public Education

  • Published:
Journal of Educational Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Most systems of public education have experienced major change in recent years and more is clearly in store. There is much debate as to whether the public good is served. This paper proposes a `public good' test of policy and practice based around six core values (choice, equity, access, efficiency, economic, growth and harmony). Three scenarios for the future of public education are tested against these values, with only one offering an optimal balance. Nine domains of policy and practice are explored in the light of these values (curriculum, pedagogy, design, professionalism, funding, leadership, management, governance and boundary spanning). Abandonment of some policies and practices is proposed to help ensure the feasibility of this work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Archer, J. (1999). Unexplored territory: Home schooling is growing, but many researchers shy away from the topic. Education Week, 8 December, 22–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, M. (1999). A World Class School System for the 21st Century: The Blair Government's Education Reform Strategy, No. 90 in a Seminar Series of the Incorporated Association of Registered Teachers of Victoria (IARTV), December [ISBN 1 876323 31 0x] [reprint of a paper presented at the Skol Tema Conference in Stockholm in September 1999].

  • Beck, U. (1999). Beyond the nation state. New Statesman, 6 December, 25–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentley, T. (1998). Learning beyond the Classroom: Education for a Changing World. London: Demos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, L. (1999). Principals as boundary spanners: Working collaboratively to solve problems. NASSP Bulletin 83(11), 38–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bukowitz, W.R. & Williams, R.L. (1999). The Knowledge Management Fieldbook. London: Financial Times Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Business Week (2000). For-profit Schools. Cover story, February 7. [http://www. businessweek. com]

  • Caldwell, B.J. & Hayward, D.K. (1998). The Future of Schools: Lessons from the Reform of Public Education. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, B.J. & Spinks, J.M. (1998). Beyond the Self-managing School. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, J. (1997). Leading the learning community. Leading and Managing 3(3), 151–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, J. & Aspin, D. (1997). The School, the Community and Lifelong Learning. London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • David-Evans, M. (2000). From seams to seamless: Building a lifelong learning ministry'. Presentation at the Education 2000 conference on the theme ‘New Leaders, New Schools, A New Future’ hosted by the National Technological University National Institute of Education, Singapore, April 7- 8.

  • Delors, J. (ed) (1996). Learning: The Treasure Within. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimmock, C. (2000). Designing the Learning-centred School: A Cross-cultural Perspective. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P.F. (1999). Leadership Challenges for the 21st Century. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Education Department (HK) (1999). Education in Hong Kong: A Brief Account of the Educational System with Statistical Summary. Hong Kong: Education Department.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, L. (1999). The Horizontal Society. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of Mind. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goertz, M.E. & Odden, A. (eds) (1999). School-based Financing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, N. (2000). Boomtime for home-schoolers, Times Educational Supplement, April 21 see related web-sites http://www.ucanteach.com; http://www.flora.org/oftp].

  • Hackett, G. & Barnard, N. (2000). Schools to be hub of welfare centres. Times Educational Supplement, March 17.

  • Handy, C. (1997). The Hungry Spirit. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, D. (1999). Schools of the future: The key role of innovation, in OECD, Innovating Schools. Paris: OECD, pp. 45–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hentschke, G. (2000). Opportunities for innovation in education, Foreword in L. Billingsley and colleagues, Innovations for Excellence in Education: The California Charter School Story. San Carlos, CA: California Network of Educational Charters. [http://www.cenec.org]

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, P.W. & Crévola, C. (1999) The role of standards in educational reform for the 21st century, in D. Marsh (ed), Preparing Our Schools for the 21st Century. ASCD Yearbook 1999, Alexandria, Virginia: ASCD (Chapter 6).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ip, P.K. (1996). Confucian familial collectivism and the underdevelopment of the civic person. In L.N-K Lo & S-W Man (eds), Moral and Civic Education (Chapter 3). Hong Kong: Hong Kong Institute of Educational Research, The Chinese University of Hong Kong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, K.J. (1999). Schools for Tomorrow: Cyber Learning Organizations for the Techno Generation or Social Anchors in a Fast Changing Global Order? No 89 in a Seminar Series of the Incorporated Association of Registered Teachers of Victoria, December [ISBN 1 876323 30 2x].

  • Kundera, M. (1998). Identity. London: Faber and Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, H.A. (1999). Two new mental models for schools and their implications for principals’ roles, responsibilities, and preparation. NASSP Bulletin 83(611), 8–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leadbeater, C. (1999). It's not the economy, stupid. New Statesman, Special Supplement on the theme Knowledge is Power! 27 September, pp. iv–vi.

  • McEwan, I. (1998). Enduring Love. London: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacGilchrist, B., Myers, K. & Reed, J. (1997). The Intelligent School. London: Paul Chapman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansbridge, J. (1998) On the contested nature of the public good. In W.W. Powell and E.S. Clemens (eds), Private Action and the Public Good (Chapter 1, pp. 3–19). New Haven and London: Yale University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, S. (1998). Third way: A challenge for all in education, Times Educational Supplement. June 26, pp. 44–45.

  • Morris, E. (2000). As reported in ‘Private firms welcome to run successful schools, says minister', Times Educational Supplement Internet Service, March 22. [http://www.tes. co.uk/tp/900000/20000317/PRN/hotnews/hotnewsbody.html]

  • Murphy, J.T. (1999). Remarks on the theme ‘The Next Millennium: Now What’, CNN special program (transcript).

  • Nelson, B., Berman, P., Ericson, J., Kamprath, N., Perry, R., Silverman, D. & Solomon, D. (2000). The State of Charter Schools 2000. Fourth-Year Report,Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement, US Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papert, S. (1993). The Children's Machine: Rethinking School in the Age of the Computer. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pope John Paul 11 (1999). Catholic schools deserve equal recognition, L'Osservatore Romano, 1 December, p. 8 [translation of an address to closing session of the National Assembly of Italian Catholic Schools conducted in St Peter's Square, 30 October].

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, K.N. & Levacic, R. (eds) (1999). Needs-based Resource Allocation in Education via Formula Funding of Schools. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnaiberg, L. (1999). Seeking a competitive advantage. Education Week, 8 December, pp. 1, 12- 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seltzer, K. (1999). A whole new way of learning. New Statesman, Special Supplement on the theme Knowledge is Power! 27 September, pp. xvii–xix.

  • Seltzer, K. & Bentley, T. (1999). The Creative Age: Knowledge and Skills for the New Economy. London: Demos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan, G. (1999). Asian Values Western Dreams. St. Leonards: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spender, D. (1995). Nattering on the Net: Women, Power and Cyberspace. North Melbourne: Spinifex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, T.A. (1997). Intellectual Capital: The New Wealth of Organizations. London: Nicholas Brealey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, A.D. & King, R.A. (1997). School Finance: Its Economics and Politics, Second Edition. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swerdlik, M.E., Reeder, G.D. & Bucy, J.E. (1999). A partnership between educators and professionals in medicine, mental health, and social services. NASSP Bulletin 83(611),72–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tooley, J. (2000). Reclaiming Education. London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yao, X. (2000). An Introduction to Confucianism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zetlin, A.G. & Lim, C. (1998). Implementation of systemic reform: restructuring health and social services in a large urban school district. Urban Education 33(4), 516–533.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Caldwell, B.J. A `Public Good' Test to Guide the Transformation of Public Education. Journal of Educational Change 1, 307–329 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010022506074

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010022506074

Keywords

Navigation