Skip to main content
Log in

Empirical Modeling of Relationships Between Sorghum Yield and Soil Properties

  • Published:
Precision Agriculture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A crucial part of any site-specific management is the identification of causes of yield variability and assessment of crop requirements. Therefore, relationships between yield and soil properties must be identified. In this study, relationships between sorghum yield and soil properties on a verbosols within a field located in Moree, in northern NSW, Australia, were examined. Measured soil properties included pH; available phosphorus; percent clay, silt and sand; gravimetric moisture content of air-dry soil and at matric potentials corresponding to −1 500 kPa and −33 kPa; percent organic carbon; CEC and exchangeable calcium, magnesium, sodium and potassium and copper, zinc, manganese and iron contents. The exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP) and the Ca/Mg ratio were calculated. We used a number of empirical methods and found that neural networks, projection pursuit regression, generalized additive models and regression trees are good techniques for modeling yield response. However, further comparison of these techniques is needed. By modeling yield response to individual soil properties and using kriging to map yields predicted from these models, it was possible to identify which soil properties limited production in different areas of the field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • B. Acock and Y. A. Pachepsky, in Precision Agriculture '97 Volume I: Spatial Variability in Soil and Crop, edited by J. V. Stafford (BIOS Scientific Publishers Ltd., Oxford, 1997), p. 397.

    Google Scholar 

  • V. Barnett, S. Landau, J. J. Colls, J. Craigon, R. A. C. Mitchell, and R. W. Payne, in Precision Agriculture: Spatial and Temporal Variability of Environmental Quality, edited by J. V. Lake, G. R. Bock, and J. A. Goode (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 1997), p. 79.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. W. Buchleiter, W. C. Bausch, H. R. Duke, and D. F. Heermann, in Precision Agriculture '97 Volume I: Spatial Variability in Soil and Crop, edited by J. V. Stafford (BIOS Scientific Publishers Ltd., Oxford, 1997), p. 351.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. A. Cambardella, T. S. Colvin, D. L. Karlen, S. D. Logsdon, E. C. Berry, J. K. Radke, T. C. Kaspar, T. B. Parkin, and D. B. Jaynes, in Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Precision Agriculture, edited by P. C. Robert, R. H. Rust, and W. E. Larson (ASA, CSSA, SSSA, Madison, 1996), p. 189.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Daniel and F. S. Wood, Fitting Equations to Data (Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1971), p. 86.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. R. Day, Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 35, 54 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  • J. H. Friedman and W. Stuetzle, Journal of the American Statistical Association 76, 817 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • W. H. Gardner, in Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 1—Physical and Mineralogical Methods (2nd edn.), edited by A. Klute (Soil Science Society of America Inc, Madison, 1986), p. 493.

    Google Scholar 

  • T. J. Hastie, in Statistical Models in S, edited by J. M. Chambers and T. J. Hastie (Wadsworth and Brooks/Cole Advanced Books and Software, California, 1992), p. 249.

    Google Scholar 

  • T. J. Hastie and R. J. Tibshirani, Generalized Additive Models (Chapman and Hall, London, 1996), Chapter 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. F. Isbell, The Australian Soil Classification (CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne, 1996), p. 102.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. P. Mallarino, P. N. Hinz, and E. S. Oyarzabal, in Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Precision Agriculture, edited by P. C. Robert, R. H. Rust, and W. E. Larson (ASA, CSSA, SSSA, Madison, 1996), p. 151.

    Google Scholar 

  • W. C. Mayaki, L. R. Stone, and I. D. Teare, Agronomy Journal 68, 532 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • A. B. McBratney and M. J. Pringle, in Precision Agriculture '97 Volume I: Spatial Variability in Soil and Crop, edited by J. V. Stafford (BIOS Scientific Publishers Ltd., Oxford, 1997), p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. B. McBratney, B. M. Whelan, and T. M. Shatar, in Precision Agriculture: Spatial and Temporal Variability of Environmental Quality, edited by J. V. Lake, G. R. Bock, and J. A. Goode (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 1997), p 141.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Moore, in Proceedings of the Seminar on Site Specific Farming, S. E. Olesen (Ed.) (Danish Institute of Plant and Soil Science, Tjele, 1995), p. 123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Y. A. Pachepsky, D. Timlin, and G. Varallyay, Soil Science Society of America Journal 60, 727 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Pocknee, B. C. Boydell, H. M. Green, D. J. Waters, and C. K. Kvien, in Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Precision Agriculture, edited by P. C. Robert, R. H. Rust, and W. E. Larson (ASA, CSSA, SSSA, Madison, 1996), p. 159.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. E. Rayment and F. R. Higginson, Australian Laboratory Handbook of Soil and Water Chemical Methods (Inkata Press, Melbourne, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistical Sciences, S-Plus Guide to Statistical and Mathematical Analysis (Statsci, Seattle, 1995).

  • K. A. Sudduth, S. T. Drummond, S. J. Birrell, and N. R. Kitchen, in Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Precision Agriculture, edited by P. C. Robert, R. H. Rust, and W. E. Larson (ASA, CSSA, SSSA, Madison, 1996), p. 129.

    Google Scholar 

  • K. A. Sudduth, S. T. Drummond, S. J. Birrell, and N. R. Kitchen, in Precision Agriculture '97 Volume I: Spatial Variability in Soil and Crop, edited by J. V. Stafford (BIOS Scientific Publishers Ltd, Oxford, 1997), p. 439.

    Google Scholar 

  • W. N. Venables and B. D. Ripley, Modern Applied Statistics with S-Plus (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1994), Chapters 10 and 13.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shatar, T.M., Mcbratney, A.B. Empirical Modeling of Relationships Between Sorghum Yield and Soil Properties. Precision Agriculture 1, 249–276 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009968907612

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009968907612

Navigation