Skip to main content
Log in

Classroom Learning Environments and Students' Approaches to Learning

  • Published:
Learning Environments Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Four hundred and eighty-four students from two metropolitan secondary schools completed the Learning Process Questionnaire, the Individualised Classroom Environment Questionnaire and the Learner Self Concept scale. Relationships between perceptions of the classroom learning environment, approaches to learning and self concept as a learner were investigated. Gender and level of schooling (junior high versus senior high) differences were examined. Results showed Deep Approaches to learning were significantly related to classroom learning environments which were perceived to be highly personalised and to be encouraging active participation in the learning process and the use of investigative skills in learning activities. High learner self concept was positively associated with Deep Approaches to learning and with classrooms perceived as high in Personalisation. It was negatively associated with Surface Approaches to learning. Differences in perceptions of learning environments and approaches to learning in relation to gender and level of schooling were small. The implications of these findings are discussed and strategies for facilitating Deep Approaches to learning are referred to.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Bain, J. (1994). Understanding learning or learning by understanding: how shall we teach? Inaugural lecture presented at Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia.

  • Biggs, J. (1987). Student approaches to learning and studying. Melbourne, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. (1989). Approaches to the enhancement of tertiary teaching. Higher Education Research and Development, 8, 7–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. (1993). What do inventories of students' learning processes really measure?: a theoretical view and clarification. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 3–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. & Moore, P. (1993). The process of learning (3rd ed.). Sydney, Australia: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnett, P.C. (1991). Self-concept and decision-making style in college students. Australian Psychologist, 26, 55–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnett, P.C. (1996). The Learner Self Concept Scale. QUT Centre for Cognitive Processes in Learning, Brisbane, Australia, unpublished questionnaire.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnett, P.C. & Dart, B.C. (1997). Conventional versus confirmatory factor analysis: methods for validating the structure of existing scales. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 30, 126–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. & Smith, D. (1997, December). Effective teaching for students with differing approaches to learning. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Brisbane, Australia.

  • Clarke, J.A. & Dart, B.C. (1994, December). The relationship between students' approaches to learning and their perceptions of what helps and hinders their learning. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Newcastle, Australia.

  • Cleave-Hogg, D. & Rothman, A.I. (1991). Discerning views: medical students' perceptions of their learning environment. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 14, 456–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1969). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sources. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. & Cohen, P. (1975). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dart, B.C. (1977). Perceptions of the community relating to the effectiveness of secondary school teachers. Queensland Institute of Educational Research Journal, 15, 2–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dart, B.C. (1994). A goal-mediational model of personal and environmental influences on tertiary students' strategy use. Higher Education, 28, 453–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dart, B.C. (1997). Adult learners' metacognitive behaviour in higher education. In P. Sutherland (Ed.), Adult learning: a reader (pp. 30–43). London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dart, B.C. (1998). Teaching for improved learning in small classes. In B.C. Dart & G.M. Boulton-Lewis (Eds.), Teaching and learning in higher education (pp. 222–249). Melbourne, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dart, B.C., Boulton-Lewis, G.M., Brownlee, J.M. & McCrindle, A.R. (1998). Changes in knowledge of teaching and learning through journal writing. Research Papers in Education: Policy and Practice, 13, 291–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dart, B.C. & Clarke, J.A. (1991). Helping students become better learners: a case study in teacher education. Higher Education, 22, 317–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Charms, R. (1976). Enhancing motivation: change in the classroom. New York: Irvington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, W. (1977). Paradigms for research on teacher effectiveness. In L. Shulman (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 5; pp. 163–198). Ithaca, IL: Peacock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, E. (1971). Identity, youth and crisis. London: Faber and Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, D. & Fraser, B. (1983). A comparison of actual and preferred classroom environment as perceived by science teachers and students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 55–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B. (1986). Classroom environment. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B. (1989). Twenty years of classroom climate work: progress and prospect. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 21, 307–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B. (1990). Individualised Classroom Environment Questionnaire: handbook. Melbourne, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B. (1998). Science learning environments: assessment, effects and determinants. In B.J. Fraser & K.G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 527–564). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B., Dryden, M. & Taylor, P. (1998, April). The impact of systemic reform efforts on instruction in high school science classes. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Diego, CA.

  • Glass, G. (1976). Primary, secondary and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher, 5(10), 3–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goh, S.C. & Fraser, B.J. (1995, April). Learning environment and student outcomes in primary mathematics classrooms in Singapore. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.

  • Hofstein, A., Cohen, I. & Lazarowitz, R. (1996). The learning environment of high school students in chemistry and biology laboratories. Research in Science and Technological Education, 14, 103–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, S.L. & Waxman, H.C. (1993, May). Comparing Asian-and Anglo-American students' motivation and perceptions of the learning environment in mathematics. Paper presented at the 15th Annual Conference of the National Association for Asian and Pacific American Education, New York.

  • Lonka, K. & Lindblom, Y.S. (1996). Epistemologies, conceptions of learning and study practices in medicine and psychology. Higher Education, 31, 5–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcia, J. (1980). Identity in adolescence. In J. Adelson (Ed.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (pp. 159–187). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F. & Saljo, R. (1984). Approaches to learning. In F. Marton, D. Hounsell & N. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning (pp. 36–55). Edinburgh, UK: Scottish Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meece, J. & Courtney, D. (1992). Gender differences in students' perceptions: consequences for achievement – related choices. In D. Schunk & J. Meece (Eds.), Students' perceptions in the classroom (pp. 209–228). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, C., Eccles, J. & Feldlaufer, H. (1991). Classroom environment and the transition to junior high school. In B. Fraser & H. Walberg (Eds.), Educational environments: evaluation, antecedents and consequences (pp. 113–139). London: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. & de Groot, E. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsden, P. (1992). Learning to teach in higher education. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsden, P. & Entwistle, N. (1981). Effects of academic departments on students' approaches to studying. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, 367–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsden, P., Martin, E. & Bowden, J. (1989). School environment and sixth form pupils' approaches to learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 59, 129–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rentoul, A. & Fraser, B. (1979). Conceptualization of enquiry-based or open classroom learning environments. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 11, 233–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J.T.E. (1994). Mature students in higher education: I. a literature survey on approaches to studying. Studies in Higher Education, 19, 309–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. (1993). Gender differences in responses to the approaches to studying inventory. Studies in Higher Education, 18, 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. & King, E. (1991). Gender differences in the experience of higher education: quantitative and qualitative approaches. Educational Psychology, 11, 363–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, R.J., Hall, C.W., Bolen, L.M. & Webster, R.E. (1996). Locus of control and college students' approaches to learning. Psychological Reports, 79, 163–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R.M. & Grolnick, W.S. (1986). Origins and pawns in the classroom: self-report and projective assessments of individual differences in children's perceptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 550–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, C. (1991). Effects of different assessment procedures on tertiary students' approaches to studying. University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, unpublished doctoral dissertation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P., Fraser, B. & Fisher, D. (1997). Monitoring constructivist classroom learning environments. International Journal of Educational Research, 27, 293–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terwel, J., Brekelmans, M., Wubbels, T. & van den Eeden, P. (1994). Gender differences in perceptions of the learning environment in Physics and Mathematics education. In D. Fisher (Ed.), The study of learning environments, Volume 8 (pp. 39–51). Perth, Australia: Curtin University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, R. (1978). Correlational procedures for research. New York: Gardner Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigwell, K. & Prosser, M. (1991a). Improving the quality of student learning: the influence of learning context and student approaches to learning on learning outcomes. Higher Education, 22, 251–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trigwell, K. & Prosser, M. (1991b). Relating approaches to study and quality of learning outcomes at the course level. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 61, 265–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, D. & Hattie, J. (1981). The learning processes of Australian university students: investigations of contextual and personological factors. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, 384–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waxman, H. (1991). Investigating classroom and school learning environments: a review of recent research and developments in the field. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 26(2), 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, C.S. (1989). Teacher education students' preconceptions of teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 40(2), 53–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, A.F.L. & Fraser, B.J. (1994, April). Science laboratory classroom environments and student attitudes in chemistry classes in Singapore. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.

  • Young, A.J., Arbreton, A.J.A. & Midgley, C. (1992, April). All content areas may not be created equal: motivational orientation and cognitive strategy use in four academic domains. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.

  • Yuen-Yee, G.C. & Watkins, D. (1994). Classroom environment and approaches to learning: an investigation of the actual and preferred perceptions of Hong Kong secondary school students. Instructional Science, 22, 233–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dart, B., Burnett, P., Boulton-Lewis, G. et al. Classroom Learning Environments and Students' Approaches to Learning. Learning Environments Research 2, 137–156 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009966107233

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009966107233

Navigation