Skip to main content
Log in

The Concept of Vision in Educational Effectiveness Theory and Research

  • Published:
Learning Environments Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Educational effectiveness theory and research have developed considerably in recent years. Despite the advances, several problems remain, such as the inability of effectiveness characteristics to explain variance in student outcomes satisfactorily and consistently. In this article, we introduce the concept of vision as a potential solution for these problems. Educational effectiveness has focused heavily on behavioural factors, but the ideas behind these factors could be important as well. After discussing related concepts at the national, school and classroom levels, we introduce the concept of vision which relates ideas and behaviour more strongly than earlier concepts such as expectations and beliefs because it emphasises causal relations between educational goals and means and pays attention to the psychological, pedagogical and sociological dimensions of education. Consequences for further theory and research are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Alexander, F. (1993). National standards: a new conventional wisdom. Educational Leadership, 50(5), 9–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bashi, J., Sass, Z., Katzit, R. & Margolin, J. (1990). Effective schools from theory to practice: an intervention model and its outcomes. Jerusalem, Israel: Nevo Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, P. & McLaughlin, M. (1977). Federal programs supporting educational change: implementing and sustaining innovations. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookover, W., Beady, C., Flood, P., Schweitzer, J. & Wisenbaker, J. (1979). School social systems and student achievement: schools can make a difference. New York: Bergin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J.B. (1963). A model of school learning. Teachers College Record, 64, 723–733.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Y.C. (1996). School effectiveness and school-based management: a mechanism for development. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottom, C. (1996). A bold experiment in teaching values. Educational Leadership, 53(8), 54–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creemers, B.P.M. (1994). The effective classroom. London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creemers, B.P.M. & Reezigt, G.J. (1996). School level conditions affecting the effectiveness of instruction. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 7, 197–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmonds, R.R. (1979). Effective schools for the urban poor. Educational Leadership, 37(1), 15–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Everitt, B.S. (1974). Cluster analysis. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B.J., Walberg, H.J., Welch, W.W. & Hattie, J.A. (1987). Syntheses of educational productivity research [Special issue]. International Journal of Educational Research, 11(2), 145–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D. & Phillips, N. (1994). The relation between teachers' beliefs about the importance of good student work habits, teacher planning, and student achievement. Elementary School Journal, 94, 331–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (1991). The new meaning of educational change. London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (1992). Visions that blind. Educational Leadership, 49(5), 19–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, M.F. (1995). Portraits of educators: reflections on 18 high achievers. Educational Leadership, 52(8), 72–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldenberg, C. (1992). The limits of expectations: a case for case knowledge about teacher expectancy effects. American Educational Research Journal, 29, 517–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, H. (1997). Methods in school effectiveness research. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 8, 369–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, D.C., Birdseye, A.T., Gottfredson, G.D. & Marciniak, E.M. (1995). Increasing teacher expectations for student achievement. Journal of Educational Research, 88, 155–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guskey, T.R. & Passaro, P.D. (1994). Teacher efficacy: a study of construct dimensions. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 627–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallinger, P. & Heck, R.H. (1996). Reassessing the principal's role in school effectiveness: a review of empirical research, 1980–1995. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32(1), 5–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, A. & Fullan, M.G. (Eds.). (1992). Understanding teacher development. London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, R.D. & Azuma, H. (1991). Cultural support for schooling: contrasts between Japan and the United States. Educational Researcher, 20(9), 2–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoy, W.K. (1990). Organizational climate and culture: a conceptual analysis of the school workplace. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 1, 149–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoy, W.K. & Woolfolk, A.E. (1993). Teachers' sense of efficacy and the organizational health of schools. Elementary School Journal, 93, 355–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inagaki, T. (1986). School education: its history and contemporary status. In H. Stevenson, H. Azuma & K. Hakuta (Eds.), Child development and education in Japan (pp. 75–93). New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E.M., Gottfredson, G.D. & Gottfredson, D.C. (1997). Success for some: an evaluation of a Success for All program. Evaluation Review, 21, 643–670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuyper, H. & Swint, F.E. (1996). Microscopisch schoolloopbaanonderzoek [Microscopical school career study]. Groningen, The Netherlands: GION.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labaree, D.F. (1997). Public goods, private goods: the American struggle over educational goals. American Educational Research Journal, 34, 39–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, D.U. & Lezotte, L.W. (1990). Unusually effective schools: a review and analysis of research and practice. Madison, WI: National Center for Effective Schools Research and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, D.A., Schroeter, D.D., Combs, R.K. & Washington, K. (1992). Assigning average achieving eight graders to advanced mathematics classes in an urban junior high. Elementary School Journal, 92, 587–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mortimore, P., Sammons, P., Stoll, L., Lewis, D. & Ecob, R. (1988). School matters. Wells, UK: Open Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paine, L. & Ma, L. (1993). Teachers working together: a dialogue on organizational and cultural perspectives of Chinese teachers. International Journal of Educational Research, 19, 675–699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pajares, M.F. (1992). Teachers' beliefs and educational research: cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62, 307–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pajares, M.F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66, 543–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, A.C. & Freeman, D.J. (1986). Professional orientations: an essential domain for teacher testing. Journal of Negro Education, 55, 284–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsay, P. & Oliver, D. (1995). Capacities and behavior of quality classroom teachers. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 6, 332–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reezigt, G.J., Guldemond, H. & Creemers, B.P.M. (1997). Empirical validity for a theory on educational effectiveness. Groningen, The Netherlands: GION.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, D., Creemers, B.P.M., Nesselrodt, P.S., Schaffer, E.C., Stringfield, S. & Teddlie, C. (1994). Advances in school effectiveness and practice. Oxford, UK: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, D. & Farrell, S. (1996). Worlds apart?: a review of international surveys of educational achievement involving England. London: HMSO for the Office of Standards in Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich, Y. (1993). Educational goals of teachers in heterogeneous and homogeneous classes in elementary and junior high school. Teaching and Teacher Education, 9, 81–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, V., Anders, P., Tidwell, D. & Lloyd, C. (1991). The relationship between teachers' beliefs and practices in reading comprehension instruction. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 559–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenholtz, S.J. (1989). Teachers' workplace: the social organization of schools. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sammons, P., Hillman, J. & Mortimore, P. (1995). Key characteristics of effective schools: a review of school effectiveness research. London: OFSTED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheerens, J. (1992). Effective schooling: research, theory and practice. London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheerens, J. (1997). Conceptual models and theory embedded principles on effective schooling. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 8, 269–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheerens, J. & Bosker, R. (1997). The foundations of educational effectiveness. Oxford, UK: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanker, A. (1995). A reflection on 12 studies of education reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 77, 81–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slater, R.O. & Teddlie, C. (1992). Toward a theory of school effectiveness and leadership. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 3, 247–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R.E. (1983). Cooperative Learning. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R.E. (1987a). Mastery learning reconsidered. Review of Educational Research, 57, 175–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R.E. (1987b). Ability grouping and student achievement in elementary schools: a best evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 57, 293–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R.E. (1996). Education for all: research and reform toward the success for all children. In R.E. Slavin (Ed.), Education for all (pp. 1–13). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D.C. (1991). The Confucian continuum: educational modernization in Taiwan. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, H., Azuma, H. & Hakuta, K. (Eds.). (1986). Child development and education in Japan. New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolp, S. (1994). Leadership for school culture. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stringfield, S.C. (1994). A model of elementary school effects. In D. Reynolds, B.P.M. Creemers, P.S. Nesselrodt, E.C. Schaffer, S. Stringfield & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Advances in school effectiveness research and practice (pp. 153–189). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stringfield, S. (1995). Attempting to enhance students' learning through innovative programs: the case for schools evolving into High Reliability Organizations. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 6, 67–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stringfield, S. & Herman, R. (1996). Assessment of the state of school effectiveness research in the United States of America. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 7, 159–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stringfield, S.C. & Slavin, R.E. (1992). A hierarchical longitudinal model for elementary school effects. In B.P.M. Creemers & G.J. Reezigt (Eds.), Evaluation of educational effectiveness (pp. 35–69). Groningen, The Netherlands: ICO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teddlie, C. & Stringfield, S. (1993). Schools make a difference: lessons learned from a 10 year study of school effects. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, S., Sammons, P., Mortimore, P. & Smees, R. (1997). Stability and consistency in secondary schools' effects on students' GSCE outcomes over three years. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 8, 169–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomchin, E.M. & Impara, J.C. (1992). Unravelling teachers' beliefs about grade retention. American Educational Research Journal, 29, 199–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, T. (1994). Goals for effective schools: the view from the field. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 5, 127–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, T. (1997). What makes schools effective? a comparison of school communities in Australia and the USA. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 8, 311–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Werf, M.P.C. (1988). Het schoolwerkplan in het basisonderwijs [The school working plan in elementary education]. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Werf, M.P.C. & Guldemond, H. (1996). Omvang, stabiliteit en consistentie van schooleffecten in het basisonderwijs [Size, stability and consistency of school effects in elementary education]. Groningen, The Netherlands: GION.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walberg, H.J. (1984). Improving the productivity of America's schools. Educational Leadership, 41(8), 19–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walberg, H.J. & Paschal, R.A. (1995). Homework. In L.W. Anderson (Ed.), International encyclopedia of teaching and teacher education (pp. 268–271). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, M.C., Haertel, G.D. & Walberg, H.J. (1993). Toward a knowledge base for school learning. Review of Educational Research, 63, 249–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, R.S., Madison, S.M. & Kuklinski, M.R. (1995). Raising expectations in schooling: obstacles and opportunities for change. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 121–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Creemers, B.P., Reezigt, G.J. The Concept of Vision in Educational Effectiveness Theory and Research. Learning Environments Research 2, 107–135 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009914107039

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009914107039

Navigation