Abstract
What we believe about the nature of teaching has important implications for faculty development. In this article we contrast three different beliefs about the nature of teaching and highlight the implications for faculty development. If teaching were merely a technical enterprise where well trained teachers delivered packaged lessons, a very directive style of faculty development might be appropriate. If teaching were primarily a craft where teachers made personal judgments daily about how and what to teach, then faculty development which encouraged individual reflection and artistry might be more suitable. This article advances the argument that teaching generally(and teaching in medical schools in particular) is best characterized as a type of social practice. Social practices (such as parenting, being polite, and going to university) are purposive, rational, moral, communal, and are identified by their activities. The communal aspect of teaching means, among other things, that the prevailing social norms of faculty at particular institutions of higher education have a large role to play in shaping the practice of teaching. This being the case, faculty development needs to provide teachers the opportunity to address and reshape these powerful social norms where necessary.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Argyris, C. (1993). Knowedge for Action: A Guide to Overcoming Barriers to Organizational Change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Association of American Medical Colleges. (1992). Educating Medical Students: Assessing Change in Medical Education – The Road to Implementation (ACME-TRI report). Washington, DC.
Bland, C. (1980). Faculty Development Through Workshops. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
Bland, C.J., Schmitz, C.C., Stritter, F.T., Henry, R.C. & Aluise, J.J. (1990). Successful Faculty in Academic Medicine: Essential Skills and How to Acquire Them. New York: Springer Publishing.
Bordage, G. (1994). Elaborated knowledge: A key to successful diagnostic thinking. Academic Medicine 96: 883–885.
Case, R. (1990). Understanding Judicial Reasoning [dissertation]. Vancouver: University of British Columbia.
Clandinin, D.J. (1986). Classroom Practices: Teacher Images in Action. London: Falmer.
Clark, C. & Peterson, P. (1986). Teachers' thought processes. In M.C. Wittrock (ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching, 3rd ed., pp. 255–296. New York: Macmillan.
Craig J. (1988). Teacher training for medical faculty and residents. CMAJ 139: 949–952.
Fullan, M. (1995). The limits and the potential of professional development. In [edT.R. Guskey & M. Huberman (eds.), Professional Development in Education: New Paradigms and Practices, pp. 253–268. New York: Teachers College Press.
Gall, M. & Vojtek, R. (1994). Planning for effective staff development: Six research-based models. ERIC Document Reproduction Services No. ED 372 464. Eugene, OR: University of Oregon.
Irby, D.M. (1993). Faculty development and academic vitality. Academic Medicine 68: 760–763.
Irby, D.M. (1996). Models of faculty development for problem-based learning. Advances in Health Sciences Education 1: 69–81.
MacIntyre, A. (1984). After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Olson, J. (1992). Understanding Teaching. Bristol, PA: Open University Press.
Porter, A. & Brophy, J. (1988). Synthesis of research on good teaching: Insights from the work of the Institute for research on teaching. Educational Leadership 45: 74–85.
Scheffler, I. (1965). Conditions of Knowledge. Chicago, IL: Scott, Foresman and Co.
Schon, D. (1987). Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Toward a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Seldin, P. (1990). Academic environments and teaching effectiveness. In P. Seldin (ed.), How Administrators can Improve Teaching: Moving from Talk to Action in Higher Education, pp. 3–22. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Selman, M. (1988). Schon's gate is square: But is it art? In Grimmet & Erickson (eds.), Reflections in Teacher Education, pp. 177–192. Vancouver, BC: Pacific Educational Press.
Selman, M. (1989). Critical Thinking, Rationality and Social Practice [dissertation]. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia.
Smylie, M. (1995). Teacher learning in the workplace: Implications for school reform. In T. Guskey & M. Huberman (eds.), Professional Development in Education: New Paradigms and Practices, pp. 92–113. New York: Teachers College Press.
Taylor, C. (1983). Social Theory as Practice. Delhi: Oxford University of Press.
Vernon, D.T. & Blake, R.L. (1993). Does problem-based learning work? A meta-analysis of evaluative research. Academic Medicine 68: 550–563.
Wilkerson, L. & Irby, D. (1998). Strategies for improving teaching practices: A comprehensive approach to faculty development. Academic Medicine 73: 387–396.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
D'Eon, M., Overgaard, V. & Harding, S.R. Teaching as a Social Practice: Implications for Faculty Development. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 5, 151–162 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009898031033
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009898031033