Skip to main content
Log in

Bivariate flow cytometry DNA/BrdUrd analysis of plant cell cycle

  • Published:
Methods in Cell Science

Abstract

We describe a protocol for flow cytometry analysis of cell cycle in plants using indirect immunolabelling staining and Vicia faba, Pisum sativum and Zea mays root tip cells as model systems. The protocol is based on simultaneous analysis of two fluorescent signals. The first, obtained after staining with propidium iodide, is used to quantify total nuclear DNA content. The second, obtained after indirect immunofluorescent staining of bromodeoxyuridine (BrdUrd), is used to quantify the amount of BrdUrd incorporated into nuclear DNA. In an attempt to standardize the procedure, the effects of various conditions for partial DNA denaturation using HCl, as well as of BrdUrd concentration and incorporation time on flow cytometry DNA / BrdUrd content analysis have been studied. Maximum BrdUrd-linked fluorescence was observed after a 30 min pulse with 10 μM BrdUrd and after DNA denaturation with 1.5 N HCl (final concentration) for 30 min at 25 °C. Under these conditions, DNA content histograms with relatively small coefficient of variation (< 4%, full peak) could be obtained. To avoid non-specific staining of cytoplasm and cell walls, the protocol involves the use of nuclei isolated from formaldehyde-fixed tissues. Fixed isolated nuclei are stable and may be stored in hexylene glycol 0.75 M at 4 °C for prolonged periods prior to actual staining and analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Beisker W, Dolbeare F, Gray JW (1987). An improved immunocytochemical procedure for high-sensitivity detection of incorporated bromodeoxyuridine. Cytometry 8: 235–239.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Beisker W, Hittelman WN (1988). Measurement of the kinetics of DNA repair synthesis after uv irradiation using immunochemical staining of incorporated 5-bromo-2′-deoxyuridine and flow cytometry. Exp Cell Res 174: 156–167.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brown SC, Bergounioux C, Tallet S, Marie D (1991). Flow cytometry of nuclei for ploidy and cell cycle analysis. In: Negrutiu I, Gharti-Chhetri G. (eds), A laboratory guide for cellular and molecular plant biology, pp 326–345. Basel: Birhauser.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Conia J, Alexander RG, Wilder ME, Richards KR, Rice ME, Jackson PJ (1990). Reversible accumulation of plant suspension cell cultures in G1 phase and subsequent synchronous traverse of the cell cycle. Plant Physiol 94: 1568–1574.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Crissman HA, Steinkamp JA (1987). A new method for rapid and sensitive detection of bromodeoxyuridine in DNA replicating cells. Exp Cell Res 173: 256–261.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dean P (1986). Data analysis in cell kinetics research. In: Gray J, Darzynkiewicz Z (eds), Techniques in cell cycle analysis, pp 207–254. Clifton, NJ: Humana Press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dolbeare F, Gray JW (1988). Use of restriction endonucleases and exonuclease III to expose halogenated pyrimidines for immunochemical staining. Cytometry 9: 631–635.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dolbeare F, Gratzner H, Pallavicini MG, Gray JW (1983). Flow cytometric measurement of total DNA content and incorporated bromodeoxyuridine. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 80: 5573–5577.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dolbeare F, Beisker W, Pallavicini MG, Vanderlaan M, Gray JW (1985). Cytochemistry for bromodeoxyuridine/ DNA analysis: Stoichiometry and sensitivity. Cytometry 6: 521–530.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Doležel J, Binarova P, Lucretti S (1989). Analysis of nuclear DNA content in plant cells by flow cytometry. Biol Plant 31: 113–120.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Doležel J (1991). Flow cytometric analysis of nuclear DNA content in higher plants. Phytochem Analysis 2: 143–154.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Doležel J, Novák FJ (1986). Sister chromatid exchanges in garlic (Allium sativum L.) callus cells. Plant Cell Reports 5: 280–283.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Doležel J, Greilhuber J, Lucretti S, Meister A, Lysák MA, Nardi L, Obermayer R (1998). Plant genome size estimation by flow cytometry: Inter-laboratory comparison. Annals of Botany 82 (suppl A): 17–26.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Galbraith DW, Harkins KR, Maddox JM, Ayres NM, Sharma DP, Firoozabady E (1983). Rapid flow cytometric analysis of the cell cycle in intact plant tissues. Science 220: 1049–1051.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Galbraith DW (1990). Flow cytometric analysis of plant genomes. In: Darzynkiewicz Z, Crissman HA (eds), Methods in cell biology, vol 33, Flow cytometry, pp 549–562. San Diego: Academic Press Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gamborg OL, Wetter LR (eds) (1975). Plant tissue culture methods. Saskatoon: N.R.C. of Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gratzner HG (1982). Monoclonal antibody to 5-bromo-and 5-iododeoxyuridine: A new reagent for detection of DNA replication. Science 218: 474–475.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gray JW, Dolberare F, Pallavicini MG, Beisker W, Waldman F (1986). Cell cycle analysis using flow cytometry. Int J Radiat Biol 49: 237–253.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gray JW, Dolberare F, Pallavicini MG (1990). Quantitative cell cycle analysis. In: Darzynkiewicz Z, Crissman HA (eds), Flow cytometry and sorting, pp 445–467, Second Edition. New York, Wiley-Liss, Inc.

  20. Gualberti G, Doležel J, Macas J, Lucretti S (1996). Preparation of pea (Pisum sativum L.) chromosomes and nuclei in suspension from single root tip. Theor Appl Gen 92(6): 744–751.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Howard A, Pelc SR (1953). Synthesis of deoxyribonucleic acid in normal and irradiated cells and its relation to chromosome breakage. Heredity 6 (Suppl.): 261–273.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Johansson MC, Johansson R, Baldetorp B, Oredsson SM (1998). Comparison of different labelling index formulae used on bromodeoxyuridine-flow cytometry data. Cytometry 32: 233–240.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kubbies M (1992). High-resolution cell cycle analysis: The flow cytometric bromodeoxyuridine-Hoechst quenching technique. In: Radbruch A (ed), Flow cytometry and sorting, pp 75–85. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Latt SA (1973). Microfluorometric detection of deoxyribonucleic acid replication in human metaphase chromosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 70: 3395–3399.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Levi M, Sparvoli E, Sgorbati S, Chiatante D (1987). Rapid immunofluorescent determination of cells in the S-phase in pea root meristems: An alternative to autoradiography. Physiol Plant 71: 68–72.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Levi M, Sparvoli E, Sgorbati S, Chiatante D (1990). Biotin-streptavidin immunofluorescent detection of DNA replication in root meristems through BrdUrd incorporation: Cytological and microfluorimetric applications. Physiol Plant 79: 231–235.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lucretti S, Doležel J, Schubert I, Fuchs J (1993). Flow karyotyping and sorting of Vicia faba chromosomes. Theor Appl Genet 85: 665–672.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lucretti S, Doležel J (1995). Cell cycle synchronization, chromosome isolation and flow sorting in plants. In: Galbraith DW, Bohnert H, Bouque DP (eds), Methods in cell biology, vol 50, pp 58–81. Orlando, FL: Plant Cell Biology Academic Press Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  29. McNally NJ, Wilson GD (1990). Measurements of tumor cell kinetics by the bromodeoxyuridine method. In: Ormerod MG (ed), Flow cytometry: A practical approach, pp 87–104. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Moran R, Darzynkiewicz Z, Staiano-Coico L, Melamed MR (1985). Detection of 5-bromodeoxyuridine (BrdUrd) incorporation by monoclonal antibodies: Role of the DNA denaturation step. J Histochem Cytochem 33: 821–827.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Moretti F, Lucretti S, Doležel J (1992). Plant cell cycle analysis on isolated nuclei using a monoclonal antibody against Brd Urd. Eur J Histochem 36: 367.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Pfosser M (1989). Improved method for critical comparaison of cell cycle data of asynchronously dividing and synchronized cell cultures of Nicotiana tabacum. J Plant Physiol 134: 741–745.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Sasaki K, Adachi S, Yamamoto T, Murakami T, Tanaka K, Takahashi M (1988). Effects of denaturation with HCl on the immunological staining of bromodeoxyuridine incorporated into DNA. Cytometry 9: 93–96.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Seldon JR, Dolbeare F, Clair JH, Nichols WW, Miller JE, Kleemeyer KM, Hyland RJ, DeLuca JG (1993). Statistical confirmation that immunofluorescent detection of DNA repair in human fibroblasts by measurement of bromodeoxyuridine incorporation is stoichiometric and sensitive. Cytometry 14: 154–167.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Sgorbati S, Levi M, Sparvoli E, Trezzi F, Lucchini G (1986). Cytometry and flow cytometry of 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI)-stained suspensions of nuclei released from fresh and fixed tissues of plants. Physiol Plant 68: 471–476.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Sgorbati S, Sparvoli E, Levi M, Galli M, Citterio S, Chiatante D (1991). Cell cycle kinetic analysis with flow cytometry in pea root meristem synchronized with aphidicolin. Physiol Plant 81: 507–512.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Stroobants C, Sossountzov L, Miginiac E (1990). DNA synthesis in excised tobacco leaves after bromodeoxyuridine incorporation: Immunohistochemical detection in semi-thin Spurr sections. J Histochem Cytochem 38: 641–647.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Ten Velde GPM, Schutte B, Reijnders MMJ, Bosman FT, Blijham GH (1989). Cytokinetic analysis of lung cancer by bromodeoxyuridine labeling of cytology specimens. Cytometry 10: 807–810.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Tréin C, Planchais S, Glab N, Perennes C, Tregear J, Bergonioux C (1998). Cell cycle regulation by plant growth regulators: Involvement of auxin and cytochinin in the re-entry of Petunia protoplasts into the cell cycle. Planta 206: 215–224.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Vanderlaan M, Thomas CB (1985). Characterization of monoclonal antibodies to bromodeoxyuridine. Cytometry 6: 501–505.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Van't Hof J (1974). The duration of chromosomal DNA synthesis, of the mitotic cycle, and of meiosis of higher plants. In: King RC (ed), Handbook of genetics, vol II, pp 363–377. New York, Plenum Press.

  42. Wang H, Cutler AJ, Salem M, Fowke LC (1989). Immunocytochemical detection of DNA synthesis in plant cells. J Plant Physiol 135: 15–20.

    Google Scholar 

  43. White RA, Fallon JF, Savage MP (1992). On the measurement of cytokinetics by continuous labeling with bromodeoxyuridine with applications to chick wing buds. Cytometry 13: 553–556.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Yanpaisan W, King NJC, Doran PM (1998). Analysis of cell cycle activity and population dynamics in heterogeneous plant cell suspensions using flow cytometry. Biotech Bioeng 58: 515–528.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lucretti, S., Nardi, L., Nisini, P.T. et al. Bivariate flow cytometry DNA/BrdUrd analysis of plant cell cycle. Methods Cell Sci 21, 155–166 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009893008892

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009893008892

Navigation