Skip to main content
Log in

Using a Crop/Soil Simulation Model and GIS Techniques to Assess Methane Emissions from Rice Fields in Asia. II. Model Validation and Sensitivity Analysis

  • Published:
Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The MERES (Methane Emissions from Rice EcoSystems) simulation model was tested using experimental data from IRRI and Maligaya in the Philippines and from Hangzhou in China. There was good agreement between simulated and observed values of total aboveground biomass, root weight, grain yield, and seasonal methane (CH4) emissions. The importance of the contribution of the rice crop to CH4 emissions was highlighted. Rhizodeposition (root exudation and root death) was predicted to contribute about 380 kg C ha−1 of methanogenic substrate over the season, representing 37% of the total methanogenic substrate from all sources when no organic amendments were added. A further 225 kg C ha−1 (22%) was predicted to come from previous crop residues, giving a total of around 60% originating from the rice crop, with the remaining 41% coming from the humic fraction of the soil organic matter (SOM). Sensitivity analysis suggested that the parameter representing transmissivity to gaseous transfer per unit root length (λr) was important in determining seasonal CH4 emissions. As this transmissivity increased, more O2 was able to diffuse to the rhizosphere, so that CH4 production by methanogens was reduced and more CH4 was oxidized by methanotrophs. These effects outweighed the opposing influence of increased rate of transport of CH4 through the plant, so that the overall effect was to reduce the amount of CH4 emitted over the season. Varying the root-shoot ratio of the crop was predicted to have little effect on seasonal emissions, the increased rates of rhizodeposition being counteracted by the increased rates of O2 diffusion to the rhizosphere. Increasing the length of a midseason drainage period reduced CH4 emissions significantly, but periods longer than 6–7 d also decreased rice yields. Organic amendments with low C/N were predicted to be more beneficial, both in terms of enhancing crop yields and reducing CH4 emissions, even when the same amount of C was applied. This was due to higher rates of immobilization of C into microbial biomass, removing it temporarily as a methanogenic substrate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arah JRM & Kirk GJD (2000) Modelling rice-plant-mediated methane emission. Nutr Cycling Agroecosyst (this issue)

  • Bouwman AF (1991) Agronomic aspects of wetland rice cultivation and associated methane emissions. Biogeochemistry 15:65–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronson KF, Cassman KG, R Wassman, Olk DC, van Noordwijk M. & Garrity DP (1998) Soil carbon dynamics in different cropping systems in principal ecoregions of Asia. In: R Lal, J Kimble, RF Follett & BA Stewart (eds) Management of Carbon Sequestration in Soil, pp 35–57, CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Butterbach-Bahl K, Papen H & Rennenberg H (1997) Impact of gas transport through rice cultivars on methane emission from rice paddy fields. Plant, Cell & Env 20:1175–1183

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao M, Dent JB & Heal OW (1995) Modelling methane emissions from rice paddies. Global Biogeochem Cycles 9:183–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao M, Gregson, Marshall S, Dent B & Heal OW (1996) Global methane emissions from rice paddies.Chemosphere 55(5):879–897

    Google Scholar 

  • Denier van der Gon HAC & Neue HU (1995) Influence of organic matter incorporation on the methane emission from a wetland rice field. Global Biogeochem Cycles 9:11–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Inubushi K, Muramatsu Y & Umerayasi M (1992). Influence of percolation on methane emission from flooded paddy soil. Japanese J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 63:184–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Kern JS, Bachelet & Tölg M (1995). Organic matter inputs and methane emissions from soils in major rice-growing regions of China. In: R Lal, J Kimble, E Levine & B.A. Stewart (eds) Soils and Global Change. Adv Soil Sci 189–198

  • Kimura M & Minami K (1995) Dynamics of methane in rice fields: emissions to the atmosphere in Japan and Thailand. In: S Peng, KT Ingram, HU Neue & LH Ziska (eds) Climate Change and Rice, pp 30–45. Springer Verlag, Berlin, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Kludze HK, DeLaune RD & Patrick WH (1993). Aerenchyma formation and methane and oxygen exchange in rice. Soil Sci Soc Am J 57:386–391

    Google Scholar 

  • Knox J, Matthews RB & Wassmann R (2000) Using a crop/ soil simulation model and GIS techniques to assess methane emissions from rice fields in Asia. III. Databases. Nutr Cycling Agroecosyst (this issue)

  • Lin M & You C (1989) Root exudates of rice (Oryza sativa L.) and its interaction with Alcaligenes faecalis. Sci Agric Sin 22(6):6–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindau CW, Bollich PK & DeLaune RD (1995) Effect of rice variety on methane emission from Louisiana rice. Agric Ecosyst Environ 54:109–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu Y, Wassmann R, Neue HU & Huang C (1999) Impact of phosphorus on root exudation, aerenchyma formation, and methane emission of rice plants. Biogeochemistry 47:203–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Mariko S, Harazono Y, Owa N & Nouchi I (1991) Methane in flooded soil water and the emission through rice plants to the atmosphere. Environ Exp Bot 31:343–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews RB, Wassmann R & Arah J (2000a) Using a crop/ soil simulation model and GIS techniques to assess methane emissions from rice fields in Asia. I. Model development. Nutr Cycling Agroecosyst (this issue)

  • Matthews R, Wassmann R, Knox JW & Buendia LV (2000b) Using a crop/soil simulation model and GIS techniques to assess methane emissions from rice fields in Asia. IV. Upscaling to national levels. Nutr Cycling Agroecosyst (this issue)

  • Mitra S (1999) Effect of rice cultivars on methane emission. Agric Ecosyst Environ 73(3):177–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Nouchi I, Hosono T, Aoki, K & Minami K (1994) Seasonal variation in methane flux from rice paddies associated with methane concentration in soil water, rice biomass and temperature, and its modelling. Plant Soil 161(2):195–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Parashar D, Rai CJ, Gupta PK & Singh N (1990) Parameters affecting methane emission from rice paddies. Indian J Radio Space Physics 20:12–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Saltelli A (1999) Sensitivity analysis: could better methods be used? J Geophys Res 104(D3):3789–3793.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sass RL, Fisher FM, Harcombe PA & Turner FT (1991) Mitigation of methane emissions from rice fields: possible adverse effects on incorporated rice straw. Global Biogeochem Cycles 5:275–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Schütz H, Holzapfel-Pschorn A, Conrad R & Rennenberg, H (1989) A three-year continuous record on the influences of daytime, season and fertiliser treatment on methane emission rates from an Italian rice paddy. J Geophys Res 94:405–416

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebacher DI, Harriss RC, Bartlett KB & Sebacher SM (1986) Atmospheric methane sources: Alaskan tundra bogs, an alpine fen and a subarctic boreal marsh. Tellus 38B:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Shamoot S, McDonald L & Bartholomew WV (1968) Rhizodeposition of organic debris in soil. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 32:817–820

    Google Scholar 

  • van Bodegom PM, Leffelaar PA, Stams AJM & Wassmann R (2000) Modelling methane emissions from rice paddies: variability, uncertainty and sensitivity analyses of processes involved. Nutr Cycling Agroecosyst (this issue)

  • Wang B, Neue HU & Samonte HP (1997) Effect of cultivar difference ('IR72', 'IR65598', and 'Dular') on methane emission. Agric Ecosyst Environ 62:31–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Wassmann R & Aulakh MS (2000) The role of rice plants in regulating mechanisms of methane emissions. Biol Fertil Soils 31:20–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Wassmann R, Neue HU, Bueno C, Lantin RS, Alberto MCR, Buendia LV, Bronson K, Papen H & Rennenberg H (1998) Inherent properties of rice soils determining methane production potentials. Plant Soil 203:227–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Wassmann R, Schütz H, Papen H, Rennenberg H, Seiler W, Dai AG, Shen RX, Shangguan XJ & Wang MX (1993) Quantification of methane emissions from Chinese rice fields (Zhejiang Province) as influenced by fertilizer treatment. Biogeochemistry 11:83–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe A, Kajiwara M, Tashiro T & Kimura M (1995a) Influence of rice cultivar on methane emission from rice paddy fields. Plant Soil 176:51–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe A, Satoh Y & Kimura M (1995b) Estimation of the increase in CH4 emission from paddy soils by rice straw application. Plant Soil 173(2):225–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickham TH & Singh VP (1978). Water movement through wet soils. In: Soils and Rice, International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños, Philippines, pp 337–358

  • Yagi K & Minami K (1990) Effect of organic matter application on methane emission from some Japanese paddy fields. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 36:599–610

    Google Scholar 

  • Yagi K, Tsuruta H & Kanda K (1994) Effect of water management on methane emission from rice paddy field, Research Report. Division of the Environment of the National Institute of Agro-Environmental Science (in Japanese), pp 61–70

  • Yao H, Conrad R, Wassmann R & Neue HU (1999) Effect of soil characteristics on sequential reduction and methane production in sixteen rice paddy soils from China, the Philippines, and Italy. Biogeochemistry 47:267–293

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Matthews, R., Wassmann, R., Buendia, L. et al. Using a Crop/Soil Simulation Model and GIS Techniques to Assess Methane Emissions from Rice Fields in Asia. II. Model Validation and Sensitivity Analysis. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 58, 161–177 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009846703516

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009846703516

Navigation