Abstract
Crop rotation systems in fields could improve crop production and indirectly affect carbon and nitrogen dynamics due to multiple fertilizer applications. Therefore, it is important to evaluate the impact of these crop rotation systems on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Field experiments were conducted with three different rotation systems, and the DeNitrification–DeComposition (DNDC) model was applied to monitor and estimate crop yields and GHG emissions during three rice-upland crop rotational periods (from June 2013 to May 2016). Low methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions were observed in rice-Chinese milk vetch and single rice rotation systems. The simulated crop yields fit the observed data very well (d > 0.80, EF > 0.70) after the model was calibrated by adjusting the crop parameters. The model-simulated daily and annual CH4 emissions agreed well with the field measurements (d > 0.7, EF = 0.41–0.98). The simulated N2O (d = 0.01–0.70, EF < 0 or close to 0) of accumulated emissions and daily fluxes (d = 0.07–0.14, EF < 0) showed low levels of accuracy with field observations. The GHG emissions in Shanghai rice paddy were different under various rotation systems, with the following order: single rice rotation system < rice-Chinese milk vetch rotation system < baseline rotation system of Shanghai paddy < 1/3 (rice-Chinese milk vetch + single rice + rice-winter wheat rice-winter) rotation system < rice-winter wheat rotation system under the same nitrogen loading. The DNDC was able to predict rice yields and GHG emissions under different crop rotation systems. The results provide positive reliable indications that crop rotation systems have the potential to reduce GHG emissions; e.g., the rice-Chinese milk vetch rotation system could mitigate the CH4 and N2O emissions.
Graphic abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ball B, Bingham I, Rees RM, Watson C, Litterick A (2005) The role of crop rotations in determining soil structure and crop growth conditions Canadian. J Soil Sci 85:557–577. https://doi.org/10.4141/s04-078
Burger M, Haden V, Chen H, Six J, Horwath W (2016) Stand age affects emissions of N2O in flood-irrigated alfalfa: a comparison of field measurements, DNDC model simulations and IPCC Tier 1 estimates. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 106:335–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-016-9808-8
Chadwick D, Sommer S, Thorman R, Fangueiro D, Cardenas L, Amon B, Misselbrook T (2011) Manure management: implications for greenhouse gas emissions. Anim Feed Sci Technol 166–167:514–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.04.036
Cha-un N, Chidthaisong A, Towprayoon S (2017a) Using the DNDC model to predict methane emissions from crop-rice rotation systems. Res J Chem Environ 21:36–46
Cha-un N, Chidthaisong A, Yagi K, Sudo S, Towprayoon S (2017b) Greenhouse gas emissions, soil carbon sequestration and crop yields in a rain-fed rice field with crop rotation management. Agric Ecosyst Environ 237:109–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.12.025
Chen H, Yu C, Li C, Xin Q, Huang X, Zhang J, Yue Y, Huang G, Li X, Wang W (2016) Modeling the impacts of water and fertilizer management on the ecosystem service of rice rotated cropping systems in China Agriculture. Ecosyst Environ 219:49–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2015.11.023
Cong W, Hoffland E, Li L, Janssen B, van der Werf W (2015) Intercropping affects the rate of decomposition of soil organic matter and root litter. Plant Soil 391:399–411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-015-2433-5
De Gryze S, Lee J, Ogle S, Paustian K, Six J (2011) Assessing the potential for greenhouse gas mitigation in intensively managed annual cropping systems at the regional scale. Agr Ecosyst Environ 144:150–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2011.05.023
Deng J, Li C, Frolking S (2015) Modeling impacts of changes in temperature and water table on C gas fluxes in an Alaskan peatland. J Geophys Res Biogeosci 120:1279–1295. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JG002880
Dong W, Guo J, Xu L, Song Z, Zhang J, Tang A, Zhang Z, Leng C, Liu Y, Wang L (2018) Water regime-nitrogen fertilizer incorporation interaction: field study on methane and nitrous oxide emissions from a rice agroecosystem in Harbin China. J Environ Sci 64:289–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2017.06.007
Dutta B, Congreves K, Smith W, Grant B, Rochette P, Chantigny M, Desjardins R (2016) Improving DNDC model to estimate ammonia loss from urea fertilizer application in temperate agroecosystems. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 106:275–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-016-9804-z
Gao S, Zhang R, Cao W, Fan Y, Gao J, Huang J, Bai J, Zeng N, Chang D, Katsu-Yoshi S, Thorup-Kristensen K (2015) Long-term rice-rice-green manure rotation changing the microbial communities in typical red paddy soil in South China. J Integr Agric 14:2512–2520. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(15)61230-8
Gao X, Yuan S, Lv A, Zhou P, An Y (2016) Effects of alfalfa green manure on rice production and greenhouse gas emissions based on a DNDC model simulation. Acta Prataculturae Sin 25:14–26. https://doi.org/10.11686/cyxb2016038
Gilhespy S, Anthony S, Cardenas L, Chadwick D, del Prado A, Li C, Misselbrook T, Rees R, Salas W, Sanz-Cobena A, Smith P, Tilston E, Topp C, Vetter S, Yeluripati J (2014) First 20 years of DNDC (DeNitrification DeComposition): model evolution. Ecol Model 292:51–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.09.004
Giltrap D, Li C, Saggar S (2010) DNDC: a process-based model of greenhouse gas fluxes from agricultural soils. Agric Ecosyst Environ 136:292–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2009.06.014
Grant B, Smith W, Desjardins R, Lemke R, Li C (2004) Estimated N2O and CO2 emissions as influenced by agricultural practices in Canada. Clim Change 65:315–332. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:clim.0000038226.60317.35
Han J, Jia Z, Wu W, Li C, Han Q, Zhang J (2014) Modeling impacts of film mulching on rainfed crop yield in Northern China with DNDC. Field Crops Research 155:202–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2013.09.004
Hao Q, Jiang C, Chai X, Huang Z, Fan Z, Xie D, He X (2016) Drainage, no-tillage and crop rotation decreases annual cumulative emissions of methane and nitrous oxide from a rice field in Southwest China Agriculture. Ecosyst Environ 233:270–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.09.026
He W, Yang J, Drury C, Smith W, Grant B, He P, Qian B, Zhou W, Hoogenboom G (2018) Estimating the impacts of climate change on crop yields and N2O emissions for conventional and no-tillage in Southwestern Ontario, Canada. Agric Syst 159:187–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2017.01.025
Huang Y, Zhang W, Zheng X, Han S, Yu Y (2006) Estimates of methane emission from Chinese rice paddies by linking a model to GIS database. Acta Ecol Sin 26:980–988
Jarecki M, Grant B, Smith W, Deen B, Drury C, VanderZaag A, Qian B, Yang J, Wagner-Riddle C (2018) Long-term trends in corn yields and soil carbon under diversified crop rotations. J Environ Qual 47:635–643. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2017.08.0317
Katayanagi N, Furukawa Y, Fumoto T, Hosen Y (2012) Validation of the DNDC-Rice model by using CH4 and N2O flux data from rice cultivated in pots under alternate wetting and drying irrigation management. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 58:360–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.2012.682955
Katayanagi N, Fumoto T, Hayano M, Takata Y, Kuwagata T, Shirato Y, Sawano S, Kajiura M, Sudo S, Ishigooka Y, Yagi K (2016) Development of a method for estimating total CH4 emission from rice paddies in Japan using the DNDC-Rice model. Sci Total Environ 547:429–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.12.149
Katayanagi N, Fumoto T, Hayano M, Shirato Y, Takata Y, Leon A, Yagi K (2017) Estimation of total CH4 emission from Japanese rice paddies using a new estimation method based on the DNDC-Rice simulation model. Sci Total Environ 601:346–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.05.090
Kim S, Gutierrez J, Kim P (2012) Considering winter cover crop selection as green manure to control methane emission during rice cultivation in paddy soil. Agric Ecosyst Environ 161:130–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2012.07.026
Kim S, Lee C, Gutierrez J, Kim P (2013) Contribution of winter cover crop amendments on global warming potential in rice paddy soil during cultivation. Plant Soil 366:273–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-012-1403-4
Kraus D, Weller S, Klatt S, Santabarbara I, Haas E, Wassmann R, Werner C, Kiese R, Butterbach-Bahl K (2016) How well can we assess impacts of agricultural land management changes on the total greenhouse gas balance (CO2, CH4 and N2O) of tropical rice-cropping systems with a biogeochemical model? Agr Ecosyst Environ 224:104–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.03.037
Li C (1996) The DNDC model. In: Evaluation of soil organic matter models. Springer, pp 263–267
Li C, Frolking S, Harriss R (1994) Modeling carbon biogeochemistry in agricultural soils. Global Biogeochem Cycles 8:237–254. https://doi.org/10.1029/94GB00767
Li C, Mosier A, Wassmann R, Cai Z, Zheng X, Huang Y, Tsuruta H, Boonjawat J, Lantin R (2004) Modeling greenhouse gas emissions from rice-based production systems: sensitivity and upscaling. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 18:GB1043. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GB002045
Li H, Wang L, Qiu J, Li C, Gao M, Gao C (2014) Calibration of DNDC model for nitrate leaching from an intensively cultivated region of Northern China. Geoderma 223:108–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma2014.01.002
Li H, Wang L, Li J, Gao M, Zhang J, Zhang J, Qiu J, Deng J, Li C, Frolking S (2017a) The development of China-DNDC and review of its applications for sustaining Chinese agriculture. Ecol Model 348:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2017.01.003
Li Z, Yang J, Drury C, Yang X, Reynolds W, Li X, Hu C (2017b) Evaluation of the DNDC model for simulating soil temperature, moisture and respiration from monoculture and rotational corn, soybean and winter wheat in Canada. Ecol Model 360:230–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2017.07.013
Lu F, Wang X, Han B, Ouyang Z, Zheng H (2010) Straw return to rice paddy: soil carbon sequestration and increased methane emission. Chin J Appl Ecol 21:99–108
Meyer-Aurich A, Weersink A, Janovicek K, Deen B (2006) Cost efficient rotation and tillage options to sequester carbon and mitigate GHG emissions from agriculture in Eastern Canada. Agric Ecosyst Environ 117:119–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2006.03.023
Minamikawa K, Yagi K, Tokida T, Sander B, Wassmann R (2012) Appropriate frequency and time of day to measure methane emissions from an irrigated rice paddy in Japan using the manual closed chamber method. Greenh Gas Meas Manag 2:118–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430779.2012.729988
Mosier A, Halvorson A, Reule C, Liu X (2006) Net global warming potential and greenhouse gas intensity in irrigated cropping systems in northeastern Colorado. J Environ Qual 35:1584–1598. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2005.0232
National development and Reform Commission (2016) The 13th five-year plan for economic and social development of the people’s republic of China (2016–2020). Central Compilation and Translation Press, Beijing
Pan Q (2014) Agricultural nonpoint source pollution status and comprehensive control measures in China. Modern Agric Sci Technol 15(243):252
Riya S, Zhou S, Kobara Y, Sagehashi M, Terada A, Hosomi M (2015) Effects of N loading rate on CH4 and N2O emissions during cultivation and fallow periods from forage rice fields fertilized with liquid cattle waste. J Environ Manage 161:124–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.06.051
Sainju U, Stevens W, Caesar-TonThat T, Liebig M (2012) Soil greenhouse gas emissions affected by irrigation, tillage, crop rotation, and nitrogen fertilization. J Environ Qual 41:1774–1786. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2012.0176
Scheehle E, Kruger D (2006) Global anthropogenic methane and nitrous oxide emissions. Energy J 3:33–44
Simmonds M, Li C, Lee J, Six J, van Kessel C, Linquist B (2015) Modeling methane and nitrous oxide emissions from direct-seeded rice systems. J Geophys Res Biogeosci 120:2011–2035. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015jg002915
Stocker T, Qin D, Plattner G, Tignor M, Allen S, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley P (2013) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. In: Intergovernmental panel on climate change, working group I contribution to the IPCC 5th assessment report (AR5). Cambridge University Press, New York
Su M, Kuang F, Lv Y, Shi X, Liu X, Shen J, Zhang F (2017) Nitrous oxide and methane emissions from paddy soils in southwest China. Geoderma Reg 8:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geodrs.2016.12.003
Sun T, Zhou B (2006) Study on safety degree of Chinese land resource—based on carrying capacity of land resource in population as the standard. Resour Dev Market 22(4):345–348
Sun H, Zhou S, Fu Z, Chen G, Zou G, Song X (2016a) A two-year field measurement of methane and nitrous oxide fluxes from rice paddies under contrasting climate conditions. Sci Rep 6:28255. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep28255
Sun H, Zhou S, Song X, Fu Z, Chen G, Zhang J (2016b) CH4 emission in response to water-saving and drought-resistance rice (WDR) and common rice varieties under different irrigation managements. Water Air Soil Pollut 227:47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-015-2741-7
Tang H, Xiao X, Tang W, Yang G (2011) Effects of straw recycling of winter covering crop on methane and nitrous oxide emissions in paddy field. Acta Agron Sin 37:1666–1675. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1875-2780(11)60045-X
Tang J, Liang S, Li Z, Zhang H, Wang S, Zhang N (2016) Emission laws and influence factors of greenhouse gases in Saline–Alkali paddy fields. Sustainability 8:14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8020163
Uzoma K, Smith W, Grant B, Desjardins R, Gao X, Hanis K, Tenuta M, Goglio P, Li C (2015) Assessing the effects of agricultural management on nitrous oxide emissions using flux measurements and the DNDC model. Agric Ecosyst Environ 206:71–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2015.03.014
Wang H, Zhang D, Zhang Y, Zhai L, Yin B, Zhou F, Geng Y, Pan J, Luo J, Gu B, Liu H (2018) Ammonia emissions from paddy fields are underestimated in China. Environ Pollut 235:482–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.12.103
Xia L, Xia Y, Ma S, Wang J, Wang S, Zhou W, Yan X (2016) Greenhouse gas emissions and reactive nitrogen releases from rice production with simultaneous incorporation of wheat straw and nitrogen fertilizer. Biogeosciences 13:4569–4579. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-4569-2016
Yang J, Yang J, Liu S, Hoogenboom G (2014) An evaluation of the statistical methods for testing the performance of crop models with observed data. Agric Syst 127:81–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2014.01.008
Yu K, Wang Z, Vermoesen A, Patrick W Jr, Van Cleemput O (2001) Nitrous oxide and methane emissions from different soil suspensions: effect of soil redox status. Biol Fertil Soils 34:25–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003740100350
Yu D, Yang H, Shi X, Warner E, Zhang L, Zhao Q (2011) Effects of soil spatial resolution on quantifying CH4 and N2O emissions from rice fields in the Tai Lake region of China by DNDC model. Global Biogeochem Cycles. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010gb003825
Zhang Y, Niu H (2016) The development of the DNDC plant growth sub-model and the application of DNDC in agriculture: a review. Agric Ecosyst Environ 230:271–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.06.017
Zhang L, Yu D, Shi X, Weindorf D, Zhao L, Ding W, Wang H, Pan J, Li C (2009) Simulation of global warming potential (GWP) from rice fields in the Tai-Lake region, China by coupling 1:50,000 soil database with DNDC model. Atmos Environ 43:2737–2746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.02.051
Zhang Y, Li Z, Feng J, Zhang X, Jiang Y, Chen J, Zhang M, Deng A, Zhang W (2014) Differences in CH4 and N2O emissions between rice nurseries in Chinese major rice cropping areas. Atmos Environ 96:220–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.07.038
Zhang Y, Sheng J, Wang Z, Chen L, Zheng J (2015) Nitrous oxide and methane emissions from a Chinese wheat–rice cropping system under different tillage practices during the wheat-growing season. Soil Tillage Res 146:261–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2014.09.019
Zhang J, Hu K, Li K, Zheng C, Li B (2017) Simulating the effects of long-term discontinuous and continuous fertilization with straw return on crop yields and soil organic carbon dynamics using the DNDC model. Soil and Tillage Res 165:302–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2016.09.004
Zhao Z, Zhang H, Li C, Zhao Q, Cao L (2014) Quantifying nitrogen loading from a paddy field in Shanghai, China with modified DNDC model. Agric Ecosyst Environ 197:212–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2014.08.002
Zheng H, Huang H, Yao L, Liu J, He H, Tang J (2014) Impacts of rice varieties and management on yield-scaled greenhouse gas emissions from rice fields in China: a meta-analysis. Biogeosciences 11:3685–3693. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-3685-2014
Zheng H, Huang H, Zhang C, Li J (2016) National-scale paddy-upland rotation in Northern China promotes sustainable development of cultivated land. Agric Water Manag 170:20–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2016.01.009
Zhong J, Wei Y, Wan H, Wu Y, Zheng J, Han S, Zheng B (2013) Greenhouse gas emission from the total process of swine manure composting and land application of compost. Atmos Environ 81:348–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.08.048
Zou F, Zou F, Cao C, Ma J, Li C, Cai M, Wang J, Sun Z, Jiang Y (2018) Greenhouse gases emission under different cropping systems in the Jianghan Plain based on DNDC model Chinese. J Eco Agric 26:1291–1301. https://doi.org/10.13930/j.cnki.cjea.180634
Acknowledgements
This study was financed by the Shanghai Agriculture Applied Technology Development Program, China (Nos. G2016060301), the Youth Talent Development Plan of Shanghai Municipal Agricultural System, China (No. 20170122), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41375157), and the National Key Technology Support Program of China (No. 2013BAD11B02).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, X., Bi, J., Sun, H. et al. Greenhouse gas mitigation potential under different rice-crop rotation systems: from site experiment to model evaluation. Clean Techn Environ Policy 21, 1587–1601 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-019-01729-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-019-01729-6