Abstract
Five rice genotypes with different performance under P-stress condition were tested in both a soil pot experiment and a solution culture experiment under different P supply conditions to evaluate rice performance to P stress. The relative parameters, defined as a ratio of the parameters measured under P stress condition to the parameters measured under P sufficient condition, were used to evaluate the genotypic variation in tolerance. It was found that relative tillering ability (RTA), relative root number (RRN) and relative root length (RRL), based on ratio of the measurements at 1 ppm P level to these at 10 ppm P level in solution culture after 2-week growth, could be used to assess the genotypic tolerance to P stress in terms of P uptake ability and biomass production under P stress condition. Relative P uptake ability (RPUP) and relative P use efficiency (RPUE) were relatively independent parameters with each other, and no parameters from solution culture were found to be significantly correlated with RPUE under soil condition. The result indicates that a ratio of tiller number measured at 1 ppm P to that measured at 10 ppm P after two weeks growth under solution culture condition may be used as a simple and reliable screening parameter for rice tolerance to P stress.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anghinoni I and Barber S A 1980 Phosphorus influx and growth characteristics of roots as influenced by P supply. Agron. J. 72, 685–688.
Chaubey C N, Senadhira D and Gregorio G B 1994 Genetic analysis of tolerance for phosphorous deficiency in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Theor Appl Genet, 89: 313–317.
Fageria N K, Wright R. J and Baligar V C 1988 Rice cultivar evaluation for phosphorous use efficiency. Plant and Soil 111, 105–109.
Fawole I, Gabelman W H and Gerloff G C 1982 Genetic control of root development in beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) growth under phosphorus stress. J. Am Soc Hort Sci. 107, 98–100.
Garcia M and Ascencio J 1992 Root morphology and acid phosphatase activity in tomato plants during development of recovery from phosphorus stress. J Plant Nutri. 15(11), 2491–2503.
Ghaderi A H and Lower R L 1979 Gene effects of some vegetative characters of cucumber. J. Am Soc Hort Sci. 104(1), 104–144.
Goldstein A H, Baertlein D A and McDaniel R G 1988a Phosphate starvation inducible metabolism in Lycopersion esculentum. I. Extraction of acid phosphatase by tomato plants and suspension–cultured cells. Plant P Physiol. 87, 711–715.
Goldstein A H, Baertlein D A and McDaniel R G 1988b Phosphate starvation inducible metabolism in Lycopersion esculentum. Characterization of the phosphate starvation inducible–excreted acid phosphatase. Plant P Hysiol. 87, 716–720.
Gourley C J P, Allan D L and Russelle M P 1993 Defining phosphorus efficiency in plants In: Plant Nutrition from Genetic Engineering to Field Practice. (Ed. N J Barrow) pp 363–366, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Hirata H, Hisaka H and Hirata A 1982 Effects of Phosphorus and potassium deficiency treatment on roots secretion of wheat and rice seedlings. Soil Sci. Plant Nutri., 28(4), 543–552.
Hung H H1985 Studies on tillering ability of rice under phosphorous stress. Ph D thesis, A & M University, Texas.
Ikehashi H and Ponnamperuma F N 1978 Varietal tolerance to rice for adverse soils. In: Soils and Rice. IRRI, pp 801–823.
IRRI 1971 Annual report for 1970. Int. Rice Res. Inst., Manila, Philippines.
IRRI 1976 Annual report for 1975. Int. Rice Res. Inst., Manila, Philippines. IRTP (International Rice Testing Program) 1988 Standard evaluation system for rice, 3rd Ed. IRRI, Manila, Philippines.
Itoh S and Barber S A 1983 A numerical solution of whole plant nutrient uptake for soil root systems with root hairs. Plant and Soil 70, 403–413.
Jackson ML 1958 Soil chemical analysis. Prentice Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Katyal.
Seshu D V, Shastry S V S, Freeman W H 1975 Varietal tolerance low phosphorous conditions. Curr. Sci. 44, 238–240.
Lindgren D, Gabelman W H and Gerloff G C 1977 Variability of phosphorus uptake and translocation in Phaseolus vulgaris L. under phosphorus stress. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 102, 674–677.
Moll R H, Kamprath E J and Jackson W A 1982 Analysis and interpretation of factors with contribution to efficiency of nitrogen utilization. Agro. J. 74, 562–564.
Ponnamperuma FN1975 Understanding problem rice soils. Int. Rice Research Conference. April, 21–24. IRRI, Manila, Philippines.
Senamrayake N 1984 Varietal tolerance to phosphorous deficiency in wetland rice soils. Trop. Agric. 140, 69–78.
Torriani, A and Ludtke D N. 1985. The pho regulon of Escherichia coli, pp 224–243. In: Schaechter M (ed.) The Molecular biology of bacterial growth. Jones and Bartlett. Boston M. A.
Wu P and Tao Q N 1995 Genotypic response and selection pressure on nitrogen use efficiency in rice under different regimes. J. Plant Nutrition, 18(3), 487–500.
Yoshida S, Forno D A, Cock J H and Gomez K A 1976 Laboratory manual for physiological studies of rice. The third edition, Int. Rice Res. Inst., Manila, Philippines, p61–64.
Yoshida, K, Z Kuromitsu, N Ogawa, K Ogawa, Y Oshima. 1987. Phosphorus metabolism and celular regulation, pp 49–55. In: A. Torrrinia–Gorini, F. G. Rothman, S. Silver, A. Wright, E. Yagil (eds.), Microorganisms. ASM, Washington, DC.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ni, J.J., Wu, P., Lou, A.C. et al. Rice seedling tolerance to phosphorus stress in solution culture and soil. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 51, 95–99 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009716330296
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009716330296