Skip to main content
Log in

Fas ligand: receptor or ligand?

  • Published:
Apoptosis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this review, we chronicle the discovery, biochemical characterization, and assignment of Fas (CD95) as receptor and Fas Ligand (FasL, CD95L) as ligand. We review the functional descriptions of the molecules as death-inducing receptor and ligand or as mediators of cell division and/or growth arrest. We suggest that bidirectional mediation of signals in receptor-ligand pairs may be a common and important mechanism regulating cell fate. Bidirectional signaling clearly impacts the interpretation of experimental studies of intercellular communication.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Trauth BC, Klas C, Peters AMJ, et al. Monoclonal antibody-mediated tumor regression by induction of apoptosis. Science 1989; 245: 301–305.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yonehara S, Ishii A, Yonehara M. A cell-killing monoclonal antibody (anti-Fas) to a cell surface antigen co-downregulated with the receptor of tumor necrosis factor. J Exp Med 1989; 169: 1747–1756.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Itoh N, Yonehara S, Ishii A, et al. The polypeptide encoded by the cDNA for human cell surface antigen Fas can mediate apoptosis. Cell 1991; 66: 233–243.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rouvier E, Luciani MF, Golstein P. Fas involvement in Ca(2+)-independent T cell-mediated cytotoxicity. J Exp Med 1993; 177: 195–200.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nagata S. Apoptosis by death factor. Cell 1997; 88: 355–365.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Watanabe-Fukunaga R, Brannan CI, Copeland NG, et al. Lymphoproliferative disorder in mice explained by defects in Fas antigen that mediates apoptosis. Nature 1992; 356: 314–317.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hahne M, Peitsch MC, Irmler M, et al. Characterization of the non-functional Fas ligand of gld mice. Int Immunol 1995; 7: 1381–1386.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kim JM, Boone DL, Auyeung A, et al. Granulosa cell apoptosis induced at the penultimate stage of follicular development is associated with increased levels of Fas and Fas ligand in the rat ovary. Biology Reproduction 1998; 58: 1170–1176.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lee J, Richburg JH, Shipp EB, et al. The Fas system, a regulator of testicular germ cell apoptosis, is differentially up-regulated in Sertoli cell versus germ cell injury of the testis. Endocrinology 1999; 140: 852–858.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ju ST, Panka DJ, Cui H, et al. Fas(CD95)/FasL interactions required for programmed cell death after T-cell activation. Nature 1995; 373: 345–348.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lynch DH, Ramsdell F, Alderson MR. Fas and FasL in the homeostatic regulation of immune responses. Immunol Today 1995; 16: 569–574.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang X, Brunner T, Carter L, et al. Unequal death in Th1 and Th2 effectors: Th1, but not Th2, effectors undergo rapid Fas/FasL-mediated apoptosis. J Exp Med 1998; 185: 1837–1849.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nagata S, Suda T. Fas and Fas ligand: lpr and gld mutations. Immunol Today 1995; 16: 39–43.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nagata S. Human autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome, a defect in the apoptosis-inducing Fas receptor: a lesson from the mouse model. J Human Genetics 1998; 43: 2–8.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wu J, Wilson J, He J, et al. Fas ligand mutation in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus and lymphoproliferative disease. J Clin Inv 1996; 98: 1107–1113.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Alderson MR, Armitage RJ, Maraskovsky E, et al. Fas transduces activation signals in normal human T lymphocytes. J Exp Med 1993; 178: 2231–2235.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bellgrau D, Gold D, Selawry H, et al. A role for CD95 ligand in preventing graft rejection. Nature 1995; 377: 630–632.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Griffith TS, Brunner T, Fletcher SM, et al. Fas ligand-induced apoptosis as a mechanism of immune privilege. Science 1995; 270: 1189–1192.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hammer A, Blaschitz A, Daxbock C, et al. Fas and Fas Ligand are expressed in the uteroplacental unit of first-trimester pregnancy. Am J Repro Immunol 1999; 41: 41–51.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rogers AM, Boime I, Connolly J, et al. Maternal-fetal tolerance is maintained despite transgene-driven trophoblast expression of MHC class I, and defects in Fas and its ligand. Eur J Immunol 1998; 28: 3479–3487.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Walsh K, Sata M. Negative regulation of inflammation by Fas Ligand expression on the vascular endothelium. Trends in Cardiovascular Med 1999; 9: 34–41.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Liles WC, Kiener PA, Ledbetter JA, et al. Differential expression of Fas ligand on normal human phagocytes: implications for the regulation of apoptosis in neutrophils. J Exp Med 1996; 184: 429–440.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sarmento A, Appelberg R. Involvement of reactive oxygen intermediates in tumor necrosis factor alpha-dependent bacteriostasis of Mycobacterium avium. Infect Immun 1996; 64: 3224–3230.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Niehans GA, Brunner T, Frizelle SP, et al. Human lung carcinomas express Fas Ligand. Cancer Research 1997; 57: 1007–1012.

    Google Scholar 

  25. O'Connell J, O'Sullivan GC, Collins JK, et al. The Fas counterattack: Fas-mediated T cell killing by colon cancer cells expressing Fas ligand. J Exp Med 1996; 184: 1075–1082.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Saas P, Walker PR, Hahne M, et al. Fas ligand expression by astrocytoma in vivo: maintaining immune privilege in the brain. J Clin Inv 1997; 99: 1173–1178.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ungfroren H, Voss M, Jansen M, et al. Human pancreatic adenocarcinomas express Fas and Fas ligand yet are resistant to Fas-mediated apoptosis. Cancer Res 1998; 58: 1741–1749.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Xerri L, Devilard E, Hassoun J, et al. Malignant and reactive cells from human lymphomas frequently express Fas ligand but display a different sensitivity to Fas-madiated apoptosis. Leukemia 1997; 11: 1868–1877.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Xerri L, Devilard E, Hassoun J, et al. Fas ligand is not only expressed in immune privileged human organs but is also coexpressed with Fas in various epithelial tissues. Molecular Pathology 1997; 50: 87–91.

    Google Scholar 

  30. French LE, Tschopp J. Constitutive Fas ligand expression in several non-lymphoid mouse tissues: implications for immune protection and cell turnover. Behriner Institute Mitteilungen 1996; 97: 156–160.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Irmler M, Thome M, Hahne M, et al. Inhibition of death receptor signals by cellular FLIP. Nature 1997; 388: 190–195.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Sato T, Irie S, Kitada S, et al. FAP-1: a protein tyrosine phosphatase that associates with Fas. Science 1995; 268: 411–415.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Matsui K, Fine A, Zhu B, et al. Identification of two NF-kappa B sites in mouse CD95 ligand (Fas ligand) promoter: functional analysis in T cell hybridoma. J Immunol 1998; 161: 3469–3473.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Faris M, Latinis KM, Kempiak SJ, et al. Stress-induced Fas ligand expression in T cells is mediated through a MEK kinase 1-regulated response element in the Fas ligand promoter. Molec Cell Biol 1998; 18: 5414–5424.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Oberg HH, Sanzenbacher R, Lengl-Janssen B, et al. Ligation of the cell surface CD4 inhibits activation-induced death of human T lymphocytes at the level of Fas ligand expression. J Immunol 1997; 159: 5742–5749.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Algerciras A, Dockrell DH, Lynch DH, et al. CD4 Regulates susceptibility to Fas-ligand and tumor necrosis factor-mediated apoptosis. J Exp Medi 1998; 187: 711–720.

    Google Scholar 

  37. McNally J, Yoo DH, Drappa J, et al. Fas ligand expression and function in systemic lupus erythematosus. J Immunol 1997; 159: 4628–4636.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Tsutsui H, Matsui K, Kawada N, et al. IL-18 accounts for both TNF-alpha and Fas ligand-mediated hepatotoxic pathways in endotoxin-induced liver injury in mice. J Immunol 1997; 159: 3961–3967.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Wang Z, Dudhane A, Orlikowsky T, et al. CD4 engagement induces Fas antigen-dependent apoptosis of T cells in vivo. European J Immunol 1994; 24: 1549–1552.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Wang JKM, Zhu B, Ju ST, et al. CD4+ T cells reactivated with superantigen are both more sensitive to FasL-mediated killing and express a higher level of FasL. Cell Immunol 1997; 179: 153–164.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Shin SW, Park JW, Suh MH, et al. Persistent expression of Fas/FasL mRNA in the mouse hippocampus after a single NMDA injection. J Neurochem 1998; 71: 1773–1776.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Suda T, Takahashi T, Golstein P, et al. Molecular cloning and expression of the Fas ligand, a novel member of the tumor necrosis factor family. Cell 1993; 75: 1169–1178.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Tanaka M, Suda T, Haze K, et al. Fas ligand in human serum. Nature Med 1996; 2: 317–322.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Kayagaki N, Kawasaki A, Ebata T, et al. Metalloproteinase-mediated release of human Fas ligand. J Exp Med 1995; 182: 1777–1783.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Tanaka M, Itai T, Adachi M, et al. Downregulation of Fas ligand by shedding. Nature Med 1998; 4: 31–36.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Silvestris F, Camarda G, Cafforio P, et al. Upregulation of Fas Ligand secretion in non-lymphopenic stages of HIV-1 infection. AIDS 1998; 12: 1103–1104.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Asahara H, Hasumuna T, Kobata T, et al. Expression of Fas antigen and Fas ligand in the rheumatoid synovial tissue. Clin Immunol Immunopathol 1996; 81: 27–34.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Lau HT, Yu M, Fontana A, et al. Prevention of islet alograft rejection with engineered myoblasts expressing FasL in mice. Science 1996; 273: 109–112.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Seino K, Kayagaki N, Fukao K, et al. Rejection of Fas ligand-expressing grafts. Transplantation Proceedings 1997; 29: 1092–1093.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Seino K, Kayagaki N, Bashuda H, et al. Contribution of Fas Ligand to cardiac allograft rejection. Int Immunol 1996; 8: 1347–1354.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Chervonsky AV, Wang Y, Wong FS, et al. The role of Fas in autoimmune diabetes. Cell 1997; 89: 17–24.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Kang S-M, Schneider DB, Lin Z, et al. Fas ligand expression in islet of Langerhans does not confer immune privilege and instead targets them for rapid destruction. Nature Med 1997; 3: 738–743.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Suzuki I, Fink PJ. Maximal proliferation of cytotoxic T lymphocytes requires reverse signaling through Fas Ligand. J Exp Med 1998; 187: 123–128.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Desbarats J, Duke RC, Newell MK. Newly discovered role for Fas Ligand in the cell-cycle arrest of CD4+ T cells. Nature Med 1998; 4: 1377–1381.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Hahne M, Lowin B, Peitsch M, et al. Interaction of peptides derived from the Fas ligand with the Fyn-SH3 domain. FEBS Lett 1995; 373: 265–268.

    Google Scholar 

  56. French LE, Hahne M, Viard I, et al. Fas and Fas ligand in embryos and adult mice: ligand expression in several immune privilege tissues and coexpression in adult tissues characterized by apoptotic cell turnover. J Cell Biol 1996; 133: 335–343.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Matsuzawa A, Katagiri T, Ogata Y, et al. Lymphadenopathy induced by the coorperation between lpr.cg and gld genes is of lpr but not of gld phenotype. European J Immunol 1994; 24: 1714–1716.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Kobayashi E, Yamauchi H. Interleukin-6 and a delay of neutrophil apoptosis after major surgery. Arch Surgery 1997; 132: 209–210.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Pinsky DJ, Naka Y, Liao H, et al. Hypoxia-induced exocytosis of endothelialcell Weibel-Palade bodies. A mechanism for rapid neutrophil recruitment after cardiac preservation. J Clin Inv 1996; 97: 493–500.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Seino K, Kayagaki N, Okumura K, et al. Anti-tumor effect of locally produced CD95L. Nature Med 1997; 3: 165–170.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Arai H, Chan SY, Bishop DK, et al. Inhibition of the alloantibody response by CD95 ligand. Nature Med 1997; 3: 843–848.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Newell, M.K., Desbarats, J. Fas ligand: receptor or ligand?. Apoptosis 4, 311–315 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009670802382

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009670802382

Navigation