Abstract
Studies of school ‘restructuring’ have linked the concept to a specific normative agenda of organizational and instructional practices (such as individualized or small-group instruction, heterogeneous grouping, and team teaching). Though a number of theoretical and empirical studies point to the positive direct and indirect effects of these practices on student achievement, they tend to overlook a body of prior work suggesting that students in disadvantaged schools tend to benefit academically from more traditional types of arrangements. Tracing and building upon this literature, this study examines the impact of ‘restructuring’ on mathematics achievement among students attending a sample of socioeconomically disadvantaged schools. After controlling for salient student background characteristics, our study found no significant difference in math achievement levels between nonrestructured schools and schools that had been restructured for at least three years. However, significantly lower levels of math achievement were found among schools that had been ‘restructured’ for less than three years. We argue that these findings reflect the fact that the high complexity associated with many ‘restructured’ practices pose special problems and risks for disadvantaged schools.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boyd, William L. & Shouse, Roger C. (1997). The problems and promise of urban schools. In H. J. Walberg, O. Reyes, & R. Weissberg (Eds), Children and youth: Interdisciplinary perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 141–165.
Bryk, Anthony S. & Driscoll, Mary E. (1988). The school as community: Theoretical foundations, contextual influences, and consequences for students and teachers. Chicago: The University of Chicago Benton Center for Curriculum and Instruction.
Bryk, Anthony S. & Raudenbush, Stephen W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools (1992). Estimating the extent of school restructuring. Issues in restructuring schools, Fall, 1992. Madison, WI: Author.
Corbett, H. D. (1990). On the meaning of restructuring. Philadelphia: Research for Better Schools.
Cuban, Larry (1998). A tale of two schools. Education Week, 28, 48.
Darling-Hammond, Linda (1995). Restructuring schools for student success. Daedalus, 124(4), 153–162.
Elmore, Richard F. (1990). On changing the structure of public schools. In R. F. Elmore (Ed.), Restructuring schools: The next generation of educational reform. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 1–28.
Good, Thomas L. & Brophy, Jere E. (1986). School effects. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching. New York: Macmillan.
Graham, Patricia A. (1985). Schools: The raw, the cooked, and the half-baked. Massachusetts Association of School Committees Journal, 18(3), 12–17.
Hallinger, Phillip & Murphy, Joseph F. (1986). The social context of effective schools. American Journal of Education, 94(3), 328–355.
Haney, Walt (1996). Reflecting on authentic assessment and school reform. Teachers College Record, 98(2), 329–345.
Hirsch, E. D. (1996). The schools we need. New York: Doubleday.
Karweit, Nancy & Ricciuti, Anne E. (1997). Summer learning: Achievement profiles of prospects first graders. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Planning and Evaluation Service.
Lee, Valerie E. & Smith, Julia B. (1995). Effects of high school restructuring and size on early gains in achievement and engagement. Sociology of Education, 68(4), 241–270.
Louis, Karen S., Marks, Helen M., & Kruse, Sharon (1996). Teachers' professional community in restructuring schools. American Educational Research Journal, 3(4), 757–798.
Meister, Denise G. (1997). Implementing change from discipline-based teaching to interdisciplinary teaming: A case study of five high school teachers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University.
Murphy, Joseph (1991). Restructuring schools: Capturing and assessing the phenomena. New York: Basic Books.
National Center for Education Statistics (1994). Second follow-up: Student component data file user's manual. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
Newmann, Fred M. (1992). A developing design. A leader's guide to school restructuring: A special report of the NASSP Commission on restructuring. Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals, pp. 30–36.
Newmann, Fred M. & Wehlage, Gary G. (1995). Successful school restructuring. Madison, WI: Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools.
Perrow, Charles (1999). Normal accidents: Living with high risk technologies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Pogrow, Stanley (1997, November 12). The tyranny and folly of ideological progressivism. Education Week (On-line article available at HYPERLINK http://www.edweek.org; http://www.edweek.org§/ew/1997/12pogrow.h17).
Rock, Donald A., Pollack, Judith M., & Quinn, Peggy (1995). Psychometric report for the NELS:88 base year through second follow-up. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement (NCES 95–382).
Shouse, Roger C. (1996a). Academic press and sense of community: Conflict, congruence, and implications for student achievement. Social Psychology of Education, 1(1), 47–68.
Shouse, Roger C. (1996b). Academic press and sense of community: Conflict and congruence in American high schools. Research in Sociology of Education and Socialization, 11, 173–202.
Shouse, Roger C. (1998). Restructuring's impact on student achievement: Contrasts by school urbanicity. Educational Administration Quarterly, 34(Supplemental), 677–699.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shouse, R.C., Mussoline, L.J. High risk, low return: The achievement effects of restructuring in disadvantaged schools. Social Psychology of Education 3, 245–259 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009606526389
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009606526389