Abstract
Many parents are seeking ways to reduce their children's exposure to violence. To this effect, recommendations have been made to parents, especially with respect to television violence and related games and toys. Three such recommendations are analyzed in terms of their probable outcomes. I argue that parental decisions to block particular TV programs and to avoid purchasing toys related to violent programs, if carried out in an authoritarian manner, may not bring about the anticipated outcomes. Reasoning with children and inviting them to assist in setting up family rules are actions that encourage young children to construct the self-awareness with which they may monitor their own behaviors, without excessive external rewards or restrictions. Five suggestions for raising nonviolent children are made and examples of their implementation are provided.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Baumrind, D. (1971). Current patterns of parental authority. Developmental Psychology, 4, 1-103.
Boyatzis, C. J., Matillo, G. M., & Nesbitt, K. M. (1995). Effects of “the Mighty Morphin Power Rangers” on children's aggression with peers. Child Study Journal, 25(1), 45-55.
Bredekamp, S. (1987). Developmentally appropriate practice: Young children from birth to age 8. Washington, DC: National Associasounds tion for Education of Young Children.
Bredekamp, S., & Copple, C. (1997). Developmentally appropriate practice: Young children from birth to age 8 (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: National Association for Education of Young Children.
Carter, M. (1995). What can we do about the violence? Child Information Exchange, 26, 62-64.
Carlsson-Paige, N., & Levin, D. E. (1987). The war play dilemma: Balancing needs and values in the early childhood classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
Carlsson-Paige. N., & Levin, D. E. (1990). Who's calling the shots: How to respond effectively to children's fascination with war play and war toys. Philadelphia: New Society.
Clinton, W. J. (1996). Opening remarks by the President at children's television conference. The White House: Office of the Press Secretary. July 29. [WWW document]. URL http://www.netreach. net/~kaufman/Clinton.child.TV.7.29.html
Dorr, A. (1986). Television and children: A special medium for a special audience. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Frazier, S. L., Bates, J. E., Dodge, K. A., & Pettit, G. S. (1997). The effects of television violence and early harsh discipline on children's social cognitions and peer-directed aggression. Paper presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development (62nd, Washington, DC, April 3-6). (ED 408-098)
kaufman/children.html
Keegan, P. (1999). A game boy in the cross hairs. The New York Times Magazine, May 23, Section 6, 36-41.
Levin, D. E. (1994). Teaching young children in a violent time: Building a peaceable classroom. Cambridge, MA: Education for Social Responsibility.
Levin, D. E. (1998). Remote control childhood: Combating the hazard of media culture. Washington D.C.: The National Association for the Education of Young Children.
National Association for the Education of Young Children. (1990). NAEYC position statement on media violence in children's lives. Young Children, 45(5), 18-22.
Paik, H., & Comstock, G. (1994). The effects of television violence on antisocial behavior: A meta-analysis. Communication Research, 21, 516-546.
Reglin, G. (1996). Television and violent classroom behaviors: Implications for the training of elementary school teachers. (ERIC Clearinghouse on Information and Technology No. ED 394 687) Seawell, M. (Ed.). (1997). National television violence study (Vols. 1, 2, and 3). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Silva, D. (1996). Moving young children's play away from TV violence: A how-to guide for early childhood educators. (ERIC Clearinghouse on Information and Technology No. ED 400 052.)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chang, N. Reasoning with Children About Violent Television Shows and Related Toys. Early Childhood Education Journal 28, 85–89 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009595219927
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009595219927