Abstract
College faculty (N = 115) were recruited to investigate the influence of moral reasoning on hiring decisions about affirmative action dilemmas. Participants completed the Defining Issues Test (DIT), a standard test of moral reasoning, a measure that presented two hypothetical moral dilemmas about affirmative action that manipulated candidates' race and moral issues, and a scale evaluating the use of external norms versus self-chosen principles. Results indicated that moral issue but not race of a minority candidate affected hiring decisions. Faculty used greater percentages of principled reasoning when solving the more salient affirmative action dilemmas than when solving the hypothetical dilemmas of the DIT. Higher scores on the DIT were related to the use of principles rather than norms when making hiring decisions. Findings suggest that faculty decisions about hiring a hypothetical affirmative action candidate are more influenced by moral reasoning level and competing conceptions of justice than racial bias or ambivalence.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
American Psychological Association. (1996). Affirmative action: Who benefits?. Clarifying the debate: Psychology examines the issues. Washington, D.C.: APA Office of Public Communications and Office of Public Policy.
Ayres, Jr. B. D. (1995, February 16). Conservatives forge new strategy to challenge affirmative action. The New York Times, pp. A1, A22.
Ashmore, R. D.,& Del Boca, F. K. (1981). Conceptual approaches to stereotyping. In D. L. Hamilton (Ed.), Cognitive processes in stereotyping and intergroup behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. (pp. 1–35).
Blanchard, F. A., & Crosby, F. J. (1989). Affirmative action in perspective. New York: Springer Verlag.
Bowen, W. G., & Bok, D. (1998). The shape of the river: Longterm consequences of considering race in college and university admissions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Bronstein, P., Pfenning, J., & White, A. (1986). Getting academic jobs: Are women equally qualified—and equally successful? American Psychologist, 41, 318–321.
Cahn, S. M. (Ed.). (1993). Affirmative action and the university. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Carter, S. L. (1991). Reflections of an affirmative action baby. New York: Basic Books.
Clayton, S. D., & Crosby, F. J. (1992). Justice, gender, and affirmative action. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Deutsch, M. (1985). Distributive justice:Asocial-psychological perspective. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Dovidio, J. F., Mann, T., & Gaertner, S. L. (1989). Resistance to affirmative action: The implications of aversive racism. In F. A. Blanchard & F. J. Crosby (Eds.), Affirmative action in perspective. (pp. 83–102) New York: Springer-Verlag.
Frankel, M. (1995, February 26). Reaffirm the affirmative. New York Times Magazine, p. 22.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Gilligan, C., Ward, J. V., & Taylor, J. M. (1988). Mapping the moral domain: A contribution of women's thinking to psychological theory and education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Glazer, N. (1987). Affirmative discrimination: Ethnic inequality and public policy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Glazer, N. (1997). We are all multiculturalists now. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Greenhouse, L. (1997, June 28). Justices, ending their term, agree to hear a big affirmative action case. New York Times, pp. A1, A10.
Hass, R. G., Katz, I., Rizzo, N., Bailey, J., & Moore, L. (1992). When racial ambivalence evokes negative affect, using a disguised measure of mood. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 786–797.
Higgins, A. (May 1982). Some preliminary ideas about the influence of work on adult moral development. Paper presented at a meeting of the Radcliffe Research Scholars Colloqium, Cambridge, MA.
Higgins, A. (April 1983). The moral complexity of work and the development of moral judgment. Paper presented at a meeting of the Radcliffe Research Scholars Colloquium, Cambridge, MA.
Higgins, A. (1987). The idea of conscience in high school students: Development of judgments of responsibility. In G. Zecha and P. Weingartner (Eds.), Conscience: An interdisciplinary view (pp. 123–162). Salzburg, Austria: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
Higgins, A., & Gordon, F. (1985). The socio-moral development of two worker-owned businesses. In M. Berkowitz & F. Oser (Eds.), Moral education: International perspectives (pp. 130–148). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Higgins, A., Power, C., & Kohlberg, L. (1984). The relationship of moral atmosphere to judgments of responsibility. In W. Kurtines & J. Gerwirtz (Eds.), Morality, moral behavior, and moral development (pp. 87–105). New York: Wiley Interscience.
Katz, P. A. (Ed.). (1999). Prejudice and intergroup relations: Papers in honor of Gordon W. Allport's Centennial [Special issue]. Journal of Social Issues, 55 (3).
Katz, I., & Hass, R. G. (1988). Racial ambivalence and American value conflict: Correlational and priming studies of dual cognitive structures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 893–905.
Katz, I., Hass, R. G., & Wackenhut, J. (1986). Racial ambivalence, value duality, and behavior. In J. F. Dovidio & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp. 35–57). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Kohlberg, L. (1984). The psychology of moral development. Essays on moral development, Vol. 2. San Francisco: Harper & Row.
Krebs, D., Vermeulen, S. C., & Denton, K. (1991). Competence and performance in moral judgment: From the ideal to the real. Moral Education Forum, 16, 7–22.
Landry, F. J., & Farr, J. L. (1980). Performance rating. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 72–107.
Lemann, N. (1995, June 11). Taking affirmative action apart. The New York Times Magazine, pp. 36–43, 52, 54, 62, 66.
McConahay, J. (1986). Modern racism, ambivalence, and the modern racism scale. In J. F. Dovidio & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp. 91–126). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Milem, J. F. & Astin, H. S. (1993). The changing composition of the faculty. Change, 25, 21–27.
Moreland, K. L. (1985). Review of the Defining Issues Test. In J. V. Mitchell, Jr. (Ed.), Ninth mental measurement yearbook, Vol. I (pp. 440–442). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Murrell, A., J., Dietz-Uhler, B. L., Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., & Drout, C. (1994). Aversive racism and resistance to affirmative action: Perceptions of justice are not necessarily color blind. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 15, 71–86.
Nacoste, R. W. (1986). The taint of affirmative action. Social Science, 71, 130–134.
Nacoste, R. W. (1987). But do they care about fairness? The dynamics of preferential treatment and minority interest. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 8, 177–191.
Nacoste, R. W. (1991). If affirmative action is the goal: Affirmative action and social interaction. In S. D. Clayton, Chair, A new look at justice issues and affirmative action. Panel presented at the Third International Conference on Social Justice, July, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Peterson, R. S. (1994). The role of values in predicting fairness judgments and support of affirmative action. Journal of Social Issues, 95–115.
Rasberry, W. (1995, February 21). Affirmative action: Still needed? Gannett Suburban Newspapers, p. 9A.
Rest, J. R. (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. New York: Praeger.
Rest, J. R. (1990). DITManual. Minneapolis: Center for the Study of Ethical Development.
Rest, J. R., & Narvaez, D. (1994). Moral development in the professions. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Rosch, E. H., & Mervis, C. B. (1975). Family resemblance: studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573–605.
Shipler, D. K. (1995, March 5). My equal opportunity, your free lunch. The New York Times Week in Review, pp. E1, E4.
Skedsvold, P. R. & Mann, T. L. (1996). The affirmative action debate: What's fair in policy and programs? [Special issue]. Journal of Social Issues, 52.
Smith, E. E., & Medin, D. L. (1981). Categories and concepts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Sniderman, P. M., & Carmines, E. G. (1997). Reaching beyond race. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Sniderman, P. M., & Piazza, T. (1993). The scar of race. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Therstrom, S., & Therstrom, A. (1997). America in black and white. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Tougas, F., & Veilleux, F. (1988). The influence of identification, collective relative deprivation, and procedure of implementation on women's response to affirmative action: A causal modeling approach. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 20, 15–28.
Tougas, F., & Veilleux, F. (1989). Who likes affirmative action: Attitudinal processes among men and women. In F. A. Blanchard & F. J. Crosby (Eds.), Affirmative action in perspective (pp. 11–124). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Tougas, F., & Veilleux, F. (1990). The response of men to affirmative action strategies for women: The study of a predictive model. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 22, 424–432.
United States Commission on Civil Rights. (1992, February). Civil rights issues facing Asian Americans in the 1990's. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.
Vozzola, E. & Dilworth, P. (in press). In a different method: Examining a real world affirmative action dilemma. In J. Snarey and V. S. Walker (Eds.), African American perspectives on care, justice, and moral formation.
Vozzola, E. & Higgins, A. (1994). The affirmative action dilemma. Moral Education Forum 19(4), 16–30.
Washington, V., & Harvey, W. (1989). Affirmative rhetoric, negative action: African-American and Hispanic faculty at predominantly white institutions. Report No. 2. Washington, D.C.: School of Education and Human Development, George Washington University.
Wiggins, J. S. (1989). Personality and prediction: Principles of personality assessment. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vozzola, E.C., Higgins-D'Alessandro, A. Competing Conceptions of Justice: Faculty Moral Reasoning About Affirmative Action. Journal of Adult Development 7, 137–149 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009590112792
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009590112792