Abstract
This study examines how young adults evaluate gender-based social inclusion and exclusion from academic peer groups. Participants included 199 college students (Mage = 19.18; SD = 1.37, Range = 18–25), who made judgments about the acceptability of gender-based social exclusion of female and male peers from a Physics group (a stereotypically masculine field) and bystander responses to gender-based social exclusion. Equitable attitudes and acceptability of gender-based social exclusion were examined as predictors of bystander responses to social exclusion. Findings showed that participants were less likely to see the exclusion of a female as acceptable compared to the exclusion of a male. However, regarding expected bystander intervention, models differed based on condition (exclusion of a male compared to exclusion of a female peer). Specifically, in the female exclusion condition, participants’ gender predicted equitable attitudes, which then predicted expected bystander intervention and ratings of acceptability. In the male exclusion condition, equitable attitudes predicted acceptability, which then predicted expected bystander intervention. These findings have important implications for understanding how to shape inclusive campus climates.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrams, D., Hogg, M., & Marques, J. (2005). The social psychology of inclusion and exclusion. Psychology Press.
Alegría-Flores, K., Raker, K., Pleasants, R. K., Weaver, M. A., & Weinberger, M. (2017). Preventing interpersonal violence on college campuses: The effect of one act training on bystander intervention. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32(7), 1103–1126. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515587666
American Academy of Arts and Sciences. (2017). The state of the humanities in four-year colleges and universities. https://shorturl.at/uCJ46
Arman, G. (2020). Bystander intervention in the context of abusive supervision: Effects of power distance orientation and gender. Revista De Psicología Del Trabajo y De Las Organizaciones, 36(2), 111–124. https://doi.org/10.5093/jwop2020a11
Barlett, C., & Coyne, S. M. (2014). A meta-analysis of sex differences in cyber-bullying behavior: The moderating role of age. Aggressive Behavior, 40(5), 474–488. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21555
Biernat, M. (2018). Gender stereotyping, prejudice, and shifting standards. In C. B. Travis, J. W. White, A. Rutherford, W. S. Williams, S. L. Cook, & K. F. Wyche (Eds.) APA handbook of the psychology of women: History, theory, and battlegrounds. (Vol. 1, pp. 343–361). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000059-017
Biernat, M., & Sesko, A. K. (2013). Evaluating the contributions of members of mixed-sex work teams: Race and gender matter. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(3), 471–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.01.008
Biernat, M., & Sesko, A. K. (2018). Gender stereotypes and stereotyping: A cognitive perspective on gender bias. In N. Dess, J. Marecek, & L. Bell (Eds.), Gender, sex, and sexualities: Psychological perspectives (pp. 364). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190658540.003.0008
Carnes, M., Devine, P. G., Baier Manwell, L., Byars-Winston, A., Fine, E., Ford, C. E., Forscher, P., Isaac, C., Kaatz, A., Magua, W., Palta, M., & Sheridan, J. (2015). The effect of an intervention to break the gender bias habit for faculty at one institution: A cluster randomized, controlled trial. Academic Medicine, 90(2), 221–230. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000000552
Cheryan, S., Ziegler, S. A., Montoya, A. K., & Jiang, L. (2017). Why are some STEM fields more gender balanced than others? Psychological Bulletin, 143(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000052
Coker, A. L., Bush, H. M., Fisher, B. S., Swan, S. C., Williams, C. M., Clear, E. R., & DeGue, S. (2016). Multi-college bystander intervention evaluation for violence prevention. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 50(3), 295–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2015.08.034
Coker, A. L., Cook-Craig, P. G., Williams, C. M., Fisher, B. S., Clear, E. R., Garcia, L. S., & Hegge, L. M. (2011). Evaluation of Green Dot: An active bystander intervention to reduce sexual violence on college campuses. Violence against Women, 17(6), 777–796. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801211410264
Coman, A. (2016). A broader perspective of gender socialization across four social institutions. Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Braşov, 9(58), 65–72.
Cooley, S., Elenbaas, L., & Killen, M. (2016). Social exclusion based on group membership is a form of prejudice. In S. S. Horn, M. D. Ruck, & L. S. Liben (Eds.), Advances in Child Development and Behavior (pp. 103–129). Elsevier Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.acdb.2016.04.004
Cyr, E. N., Bergsieker, H. B., Dennehy, T. C., & Schmader, T. (2021). Mapping social exclusion in STEM to men’s implicit bias and women’s career costs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(40), 1. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2026308118
Davis, S., & Nixon, C. (2011). Empowering bystanders. In J. W. Patchin & S. Hinduja (Eds.), Cyberbullying prevention and response: Expert perspectives (1st ed., pp. 93–109). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203818312
Diemer, M. A., Rapa, L. J., Park, C. J., & Perry, J. C. (2017). Development and validation of the critical consciousness scale. Youth & Society, 49(4), 461–483. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X14538289
Fisher, B. S., Sloan, J. J., Cullen, F. T., & Lu, C. (1998). Crime in the ivory tower: The level and sources of student victimization. Criminology, 36(3), 671–710. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1998.tb01262.x
Forbes, H., Stark, A. M., Hopkins, S. W., & Fireman, G. D. (2020). The effects of group membership on college students’ social exclusion of peers and bystander behavior. The Journal of Psychology, 154(1), 15–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2019.1642839
Ford, T. E., Triplett, S. R., Woodzicka, J. A., Kochersberger, A. O., & Holden, C. (2014). Not all groups are equal: Differential vulnerability of social groups to the prejudice-releasing effects of disparagement humor. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 17, 178–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430213502558
Freire, P. (1973). Education, liberation and the church. Religious Education, 9(1), 1–15.
Ganley, C. M., George, C. E., Cimpian, J. R., & Makowski, M. B. (2018). Gender equity in college majors: Looking beyond the STEM/Non-STEM dichotomy for answers regarding female participation. American Educational Research Journal, 55(3), 453–487. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831217740221
Gönültaş, S., & Mulvey, K. L. (2021). Bystander responses to bias-based bullying and retaliation: Is retaliation perceived as more acceptable than bias-based bullying? The British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 39(3), 442–461. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12371
Haines, E. L., Deaux, K., & Lofaro, N. (2016). The times they are a-changing… Or are they not? A comparison of gender stereotypes, 1983–2014. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40(3), 353–363. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684316634081
Herry, E., Gönültaş, S., & Mulvey, K. L. (2021). Digital era bullying: An examination of adolescent judgments about bystander intervention online. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 76, 101322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2021.101322
Herry, E., & Mulvey, K. L. (2022). Gender-based cyberbullying: Understanding expected bystander behavior online. Journal of Social Issues, 00, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12503
Hitti, A., Mulvey, K. L., Rutland, A., Abrams, D., & Killen, M. (2014). When is it okay to exclude a member of the ingroup? Children’s and adolescents’ social reasoning. Social Development, 23(3), 451–469. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12047
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Killen, M., Mulvey, K. L., & Hitti, A. (2013a). Social exclusion in childhood: A developmental intergroup perspective. Child Development, 84(3), 772–790. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12012
Killen, M., & Rutland, A. (2011). Children and social exclusion: Morality, prejudice, and group identity. Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444396317
Killen, M., Rutland, A., Abrams, D., Mulvey, K. L., & Hitti, A. (2013b). Development of intra- and intergroup judgments in the context of moral and social-conventional norms. Child Development, 84(3), 1063–1080. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12011
Killen, M., & Stangor, C. (2001). Children’s social reasoning about inclusion and exclusion in gender and race peer group contexts. Child Development, 72(1), 174–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00272
Knobloch-Westerwick, S., Glynn, C. J., & Huge, M. (2013). The Matilda effect in science communication: An experiment on gender bias in publication quality perceptions and collaboration interest. Science Communication, 35(5), 603–625. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547012472684
Latane, B., & Darley, J. M. (1970). The unresponsive bystander: Why doesn’t he help? Appleton Century Croft Publishing.
Levine, M., Cassidy, C., Brazier, G., & Reicher, S. (2002). Self-categorization and bystander non-intervention: Two experimental studies. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(7), 1452–1463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb01446.x
Lewis, J. A. (2018). From modern sexism to gender microaggressions: Understanding contemporary forms of sexism and their influence on diverse women. In C. B. Travis, J. W. White, A. Rutherford, W. S. Williams, S. L. Cook, & K. F. Wyche (Eds.), APA handbook of the psychology of women: History, theory, and battlegrounds (pp. 381–397). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000059-019
Liben, L. S., & Bigler, R. S. (2002). The developmental course of gender differentiation: Conceptualizing, measuring and evaluating constructs and pathways. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 67(2), 7–147.
Lyons, M., Brewer, G., Castro Caicedo, J., Andrade, M., Morales, M., & Centifanti, L. (2022). Barriers to sexual harassment bystander intervention in Ecuadorian universities. Global Public Health, 17(6), 1029–1040. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2021.1884278
MacPhee, D., Farro, S., & Canetto, S. S. (2013). Academic self-efficacy and performance of underrepresented STEM majors: Gender, ethnic, and social class patterns. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy (ASAP), 13(1), 347–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12033
Master, A., Meltzoff, A. N., & Cheryan, S. (2021). Gender stereotypes about interests start early and cause gender disparities in computer science and engineering. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(48), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2100030118
Moss-Racusin, C. A., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Graham, M. J., & Handelsman, J. (2012). Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(41), 16474–16479. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1211286109
Moss-Racusin, C. A., Sanzari, C., Caluori, N., & Rabasco, H. (2018). Gender bias produces gender gaps in STEM engagement. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 79(11–12), 651–670. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0902-z
Mulvey, K. L. (2016). Children’s reasoning about social exclusion: Balancing many factors. Child Development Perspectives, 10(1), 22–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12157
Mulvey, K. L., Gönültaş, S., Goff, E., Irdam, G., Carlson, R., DiStefano, C., & Irvin, M. J. (2019). School and family factors predicting adolescent cognition regarding bystander intervention in response to bullying and victim retaliation. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 48(3), 581–596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-018-0941-3
Mulvey, K. L., Hitti, A., & Killen, M. (2010). The development of stereotyping and exclusion. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 1(4), 597–606. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.66
Mulvey, K. L., & Killen, M. (2016). Keeping quiet just wouldn’t be right: Children’s and adolescents’ evaluations of challenges to peer relational and physical aggression. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45(9), 1824–1835. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0437-y
Mulvey, K. L., Palmer, S. B., & Abrams, D. (2016). Race-based humor and peer group dynamics in adolescence: Bystander intervention and social exclusion. Child Development, 87(5), 1379–1391. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12600
National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. (2019). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering (NSF 19–304). (Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering, Issue. https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf19304/
National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. (2021). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering (NSF 21–321). NSF. https://ncses.nsf.gov/wmpd.
National Science Board. (2018). Science and Engineering Indicators 2018 (NSB-2018–1). https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/indicators/
National Science Board, N. S. F. (2022). Science and engineering indicators 2022: The state of U.S. science and engineering (NSB-2022–1). https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20221
Piatek-Jimenez, K., Cribbs, J., & Gill, N. (2018). College students’ perceptions of gender stereotypes: Making connections to the underrepresentation of women in STEM fields. International Journal of Science Education, 40(12), 1432–1454. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1482027
Pietri, E. S., Moss-Racusin, C. A., Dovidio, J. F., Guha, D., Roussos, G., Brescoll, V. L., & Handelsman, J. (2017). Using video to increase gender bias literacy toward women in science. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 41(2), 175–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684316674721
Power, J. L., Brotheridge, C. M., Blenkinsopp, J., Bowes-Sperry, L., Bozionelos, N., Buzády, Z., Chuang, A., Drnevich, D., Garzon-Vico, A., Leighton, C., Madero, S. M., Mak, W.-M., Mathew, R., Monserrat, S. I., Mujtaba, B. G., Olivas-Lujan, M. R., Polycroniou, P., Sprigg, C. A., Axtell, C., Holman, D., Ruiz-Gutiérrez, J. A., & Nnedumm, A. U. O. (2013). Acceptability of workplace bullying: A comparative study on six continents. Journal of Business Research, 66(3), 374–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.08.018
Puckett, J. A., DuBois, L. Z., McNeill, J. N., & Hanson, C. (2020). The association between social dominance orientation, critical consciousness, and gender minority stigma. Journal of Homosexuality, 67(8), 1081–1096. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2019.1603493
Riegle-Crumb, C., & King, B. (2010). Questioning a white male advantage in STEM: Examining disparities in college major by gender and race/ethnicity. Educational Researcher, 39(9), 656–664. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X10391657
Rojas-Ashe, E. E., Walker, R. V., Holmes, S. C., & Johnson, D. M. (2019). Toward a more complete understanding of bystander willingness to help: What role does critical consciousness play? Sex Roles, 81(7), 415–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-1007-z
Rutland, A., & Killen, M. (2015). A developmental science approach to reducing prejudice and social exclusion: Intergroup processes, social-cognitive development, and moral reasoning. Social Issues and Policy Review, 9(1), 121–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12012
Rutland, A., Killen, M., & Abrams, D. (2010). A new social-cognitive developmental perspective on prejudice: The interplay between morality and group identity. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(3), 279–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610369468
Salmivalli, C., Voeten, M., & Poskiparta, E. (2011). Bystanders matter: Associations between reinforcing, defending, and the frequency of bullying behavior in classrooms. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 40(5), 668–676. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2011.597090
Skowronski, J. J., & Lawrence, M. A. (2001). A comparative study of the implicit and explicit gender attitudes of children and college students. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 25(2), 155–165. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-6402.00017
Soper, D. S. (2022). A-priori sample size calculator for Structural Equation Models [software]. https://www.danielsoper.com/statcalc
Spencer-Rodgers, J., Major, B., Forster, D. E., & Peng, K. (2016). The power of affirming group values: Group affirmation buffers the self-esteem of women exposed to blatant sexism. Self and Identity, 15(4), 413–431. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2016.1145593
Sundstrom, B., Ferrara, M., DeMaria, A. L., Gabel, C., Booth, K., & Cabot, J. (2018). It’s your place: Development and evaluation of an evidence-based bystander intervention campaign. Health Communication, 33(9), 1141–1150. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2017.1333561
Tam, M. J., & Brown, C. S. (2020). Early adolescents’ responses to witnessing gender-based harassment differ by their perceived school belonging and gender typicality. Sex Roles, 83(7), 412–425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-020-01126-0
Tandrayen-Ragoobur, V., & Gokulsing, D. (2021). Gender gap in STEM education and career choices: What matters? Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 14(3), 1021–1040. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-09-2019-0235
Taylor, C. J. (2016). “Relational by nature”? Men and women do not differ in physiological response to social stressors faced by token women. American Journal of Sociology, 122(1), 49–89. https://doi.org/10.1086/686698
Verniers, C., & Martinot, D. (2015). Characteristics expected in fields of higher education and gender stereotypical traits related to academic success: A mirror effect. Social Psychology of Education: An International Journal, 18(4), 719–733. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-015-9312-z
Wang, M.-T., & Degol, J. L. (2017). Gender gap in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM): Current knowledge, implications for practice, policy, and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 29(1), 119–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9355-x
Wellman, J. A., Czopp, A. M., & Geers, A. L. (2009). The egalitarian optimist and the confrontation of prejudice. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4(5), 389–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760902992449
White, B. A., Miles, J. R., & Frantell, K. A. (2021). Intergroup dialogue: A justice-centered pedagogy to address gender inequity in STEM. Science Education, 105(2), 232–254. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21599
White House. (2014). Not alone: The first report of the White House task force to protect students from sexual assault. http://shorturl.at/wyJ39
Woodzicka, J. A., Mallett, R. K., Hendricks, S., & Pruitt, A. V. (2015). It’s just a (sexist) joke: Comparing reactions to sexist versus racist communications. Humor, 28(2), 289–309. https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2015-0025
Xiao, S. X., Martin, C. L., DeLay, D., & Cook, R. E. (2021). A double-edged sword: Children’s intergroup gender attitudes have social consequences for the beholder. Developmental Psychology, 57(9), 1510. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001065
Acknowledgments
We thank the students who participated and the research assistants who aided in data collection and analysis of this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
No funding, grants, or other support was received in order to conduct this study. The authors have no financial or non-financial conflicts of interest regarding the materials or subject matter discussed in this manuscript.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Herry, E., Gönültaş, S. & Mulvey, K.L. Predictors of college students’ reasoning and responses to gender-based social exclusion. Soc Psychol Educ 26, 405–431 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-022-09748-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-022-09748-w