Skip to main content
Log in

The Oblivion of Churchman's Plea for a Systems Approach to World Problems. I. The Inseparability of Systems Thinking and World Issues in the Modern Epoch

  • Published:
Systemic Practice and Action Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The presentation of a Systems Approach made by Churchman in 1968 starts from a close link between a systems approach and tackling world problems. The link is so closed that, in the writing of Churchman seems to be a natural, almost genetic, link. Thirty years later we find that such concern for world problems has faded away from systems literature. Why? What was the nature of what for Churchman and other scholars of his time was an obvious link? How can there be such a thing as "world issues" or "world problems"? This is the first article of a trilogy devoted to find a way through those questions. In this first article, initial questioning opens a path of thinking that reveals how modern systems thinking is inseparable from world issues. At the beginning of such a path, Richard Rorty's provocative call to forget about that 5/6 of the world population that cannot be saved is found. Rorty claims that the modern question "what are we?"—which is at the basis of the concern with world problems—has been replaced, in the last 50 years, by the question "who are we?"—which leads to the pragmatical question "Who can be saved?" This in turn means a dramatic change in our moral way of thinking and acting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Ackoff, R. L. (1974). Redesigning the Future, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. B. (1981). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, Wiley, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C. W. (1968). The Systems Approach, Dell, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C. W. (1979). The Systems Approach and Its Enemies, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrater Mora, J. (1984). Diccionario de Filosofia, Alianza Editorial, Madrid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R. L., and Jackson, M. C. (1991). Creative Problem Solving, Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuenmayor, R. L. (1991a). The roots of reductionism: A counter-ontoepistemology for a systems approach. Syst. Pract. 4, 419-447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuenmayor, R. L. (1991b). The self-referential structure of an everyday-living situation: A phenomenological ontology for interpretive systemology. Syst. Pract. 4, 449-472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1952). The age of the world picture. In Heidegger, M. (1977). The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays, Harper & Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1981). Early Greek Thinking, Harper & Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1985). Schelling's Treatise on the Essence of Human Freedom, Ohio University Press, Athens.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1781-1787). Critique of Pure Reason (Smith, N. K., trans.), Macmillan, London, 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1781-1787). Critica de la Raz´on Pura (Ribas, P., trans.), Ediciones Alfaguara, 1978.

  • Kant, I. (1787). Critique of Pure Reason (Meiklejohn, J. M. D., trans.), Prometheus Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (1996). Who are we? Moral universalism and economic triage. Presented at the Second UNESCO Philosophy Forum, Paris, March. http://www.unesco.org/phiweb/uk/2rpu/rort/rort.html.

  • von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General Systems Theory, Penguin, Harmondsworth. (Reprinted 1973.)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fuenmayor, R. The Oblivion of Churchman's Plea for a Systems Approach to World Problems. I. The Inseparability of Systems Thinking and World Issues in the Modern Epoch. Systemic Practice and Action Research 14, 11–28 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009579525912

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009579525912

Navigation