Abstract
The Systems movement in the United Kingdom, in addressing the task of enquiry, has created a surfeit of methodologies. Each, like some closely guarded religious sect, demands adherence to its own presentational rules and procedures, its own epistemological and ontological position. Much of the secondary literature of the U.K. Systems movement focuses on examining the strengths and weaknesses of these separate approaches, devises complex decision rules for when to use which methodology, and attempts to map particular methodologies onto "appropriate" scenarios. This paper attempts to present a generalized form of the cyclic activity of investigation and action which is encompassed by many of the methodologies. It is shown that this does not require the presentation of a "lowest common denominator" activity set, which is of no value, but rather draws on the underlying power of the approaches to present a robust and defensible cycle of activities which are continuously reenacted over time. The implications of this spiral model of Action Learning are examined, both in relation to the development of existing methodologies and in relation to the issues related to managing a complex analysis project. The paper concludes by showing how individual analysis cycles merge into a never-ending learning spiral in a complex, dynamic, real-world environment.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Bawden, R. J. (1985). Problem-based learning: An Australian perspective. In Bond, D. (ed.), Problem-Based Learning in Education for the Professions, HERDSA, Sydney.
Bawden, R. J., and Packham, R. G. (1993). Systemic practice in the education of the agricultural systems practitioner. Syst. Pract. 6, 7-19.
Beer, S. (1985). Diagnosing the System for Organisations, Wiley, Chichester.
Brix, V. H. (1983). Action learning and control theory. Omega Int. J. Manage. Sci. 11, 491-500.
Checkland, P. B. (1981). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, Wiley, Chichester.
Checkland, P. B., and Scholes, J. (1990). Soft Systems Methodology in Action, Wiley, Chichester.
Espejo, R. (1993). Management of complexity in problem solving. In Espejo, R., and Schwaninger, M. (eds.), Organizational Fitness. Corporate Effectiveness Through Management Cybernetics, Campus Verlag, Frankfurt and New York.
Flood, R. L. (1990). Liberating Systems Theory, Plenum, New York.
Flood, R. L., (1995). Solving Problem Solving, Wiley, Chichester.
Flood, R. L., and Jackson, M. C. (1991a). Creative Problem Solving: Total Systems Intervention, Wiley, Chichester.
Flood, R. L., and Jackson, M. C. (eds.) (1991b). Critical Systems Thinking: Directed Readings, Wiley, Chichester.
Flood, R. L., and Keys, P. (1989). Methodology choice, complexity texture, self-reflection. Cybernet. Syst. 20, 401-415.
Flood, R. L., and Romm, N. R. A. (1966). Diversity Management: Triple Loop Learning, Wiley, Chichester.
Francescato, D. (1992). A multi-dimensional perspective of organizational change. Syst. Pract. 5, 129-246.
Gregory, W. J. (1990). Critical systems thinking and LST: How “liberating” are contemporary critical and liberating systems approaches? In Toward a Just Society for Future Generations. Vol. 1. Systems Design, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the International Society for the Systems Sciences, Portland, OR, July 8–13.
Kolb, D. A., Rubin, I. M., and McIntyre, J. M. (1974). Organizational Psychology: An Experiential Approach, 2nd ed., Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
MacNamara, M., and Weekes, W. H. (1982). The Action Learning model of experiential learning for developing managers. Hum. Relat. 35, 879-902.
MacNamara, M., Meyler, M., and Arnold, A. (1990). Management education and the challenge of Action Learning. High. Educ. 19, 419-433.
Marsic, V. J., Cederholm, L., Turner, E., and Pearson, T. (1992). Action-reflection learning. Train. Dev. 46, 63-66.
McLaughlin, H., and Thorpe, R. (1993). Action Learning-a paradigm in emergence-the problems facing a challenge to traditional management education and development. Br. J. Manage. 4, 19.
Midgley, G. (1990). Creative methodology design. Systemist 12, 108-113.
Midgeley, G. (1995). Mixing Methods: Developing Systemic Intervention, Research Memorandum 9, Centre for Systems Studies, University of Hull, Hull.
Midgley, G. (1997a). Developing the methodology of TSI: From the oblique use of methods to creative design. Syst. Pract. 10, 305-319.
Midgley, G. (1997b). Mixing methods: Developing systemic intervention. In Mingers, J., and Gill, A. (eds.), Multimethodology: The Theory and Practice of Combining Management Science Methodologies, Wiley, Chichester.
Mingers, J., and Gill, A. (eds.) (1997). Multimethodology: The Theory and Practice of Combining Management Science Methodologies, Wiley, Chichester.
Morgan, G., and Ramirez, R. (1984). Action Learning-a holographic metaphor for guiding social change. Hum. Relat. 37, 1-28.
Mumford, E. (1986). Using Computers for Business Success; the ETHICS Methods, Wrights, Sandbach, Cheshire.
Ngwenyama, O. K. (1993). Developing end-users' systems-development competence-an exploratory study. Info. Manage. 25, 291-302.
The Open University (1984). The hard systems approach. In Complexity, Management and Change: Applying a Systems Approach, The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK.
Paton, G. (1996). Systems analysis-an Action Learning perspective. In Jayaratna, N., and Fitzgerald, B. (eds.), Lessons Learned from the Use of Methodologies, Bristich Computer Society Information Systems Methodologies Specialist Group.
Pedlar, M. (ed.) (1992). Action Learning in Practice, 2nd ed., Gower, London.
Revans, R. W. (1980). The nature of Action Learning. Int. J. Manage. Sci. 9, 9-24.
Revans, R. (1982). Action Learning, Chartwell-Bratt, Bromley.
Saxberg, B. O. (1992). Book review of Action Learning in Practice (2nd ed.) by Pedlar M. Personnel Psychol. 45, 640-642.
Schon, D. A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action, Maurice Temple Smith, London.
Schon, D. A. (1995). The new scholarship requires a new epistemology. Change 27, 16-20.
U.K. Systems Society (1992). IS Special Edition. Systemist, ISSN 0961-8309.
Wang, H. (1995). The spiral propulsion principle. In Midgeley, G., and Wilby, J. (eds.), Systems Methodology: Possibilities for Cross-Cultural Learning and Integration, Centre for Systems Studies, University of Hull, Hull.
Zuber-Skerritt, O. (1990). Management development and academic staff development through Action learning and action research. Educ. Train. Tech. Int. 27, 437-447.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Paton, G. A Systemic Action Learning Cycle as the Key Element of an Ongoing Spiral of Analyses. Systemic Practice and Action Research 14, 95–111 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009539811800
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009539811800