Skip to main content
Log in

The First-, Second- and Third-Person Dynamics of Learning History

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Systemic Practice and Action Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Learning history is a well delineated action research process consisting of consecutive stages of inquiry where groups and individuals engage in learning and reflecting on their past shared, but often multiple, experiences as these are recorded in a ‘learning history’. Learning history has much in common with other forms of action research in that it configures first-, second- and third-person processes of inquiry in a particular way and enacts research qualities of rigour, relevance and reflexivity. Yet these and other links have as yet been tacit and under articulated - resulting in learning history often conceived as a distinctive linear method with the practice of learning history likewise confined. This reflective article opens out and makes explicit the inherent first- second- and third- person dynamics of learning history. These dynamics are explored from the point of view of different actors – the historian, the participant and the reader - in a learning history process and connections to a general empirical method are made. Finally questions of quality in a learning history are discussed. The aim of this article is to establish firmer methodological foundations for the learning history approach and to provide practical insight into how action researchers might engage more readily in learning history work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Argyris C, Putnam R, Smith D (1985) Action science. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Barthes R (1974) s/z (R Miller, trans.). New York, Hill and Wang

  • Bartunek JM (2008) Insider/outsider team research: the development of the approach and its meanings. In: Shani AB (Rami), Mohrman SA, Pasmore WA, Stymne B, Adler N (eds) Handbook of collaborative management research. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohm D (2013) On dialogue. Routledge, Abingdon

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury H (2015) The Sage handbook of action research, 3rd edn. Sage, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury H, Mainmelis C (2001) Learning history and organizational praxis. J Manag Inq 10:340–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury H, Roth G, Gearty MR (2015) The practice of learning history. In: Bradbury H (ed) The Sage handbook of action research, 3rd edn. Sage, London

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne PH (2016) The ethics of discernment. Toronto University Press, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler D, Torbert WR (2003) Transforming inquiry an action: interweaving 27 flavors of action research. Action Res 1:133–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coghlan D (2010) Seeking common ground in the diversity and diffusion of action research and collaborative management research action modalities: toward a general empirical method. In: Pasmore WA, Shani AB (Rami), Woodman RW (eds) Research in organizational change and development, (Vol 18). Emerald, Brinkley

    Google Scholar 

  • Coghlan D (2017) Insight and reflection as key to collaborative engagement. In: Bartunek JM, McKenzie J (eds) Academic practitioner research partnerships: developments, complexities and opportunities. Routledge, Abingdon

    Google Scholar 

  • Coghlan D, Brannick T (2014) Doing action research in your own organization, 4th edn. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Coghlan D, Shani AB (2017) Inquiring in the present tense: the dynamic mechanism of action research. J Chang Manag 17:121–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronin B (2017) Phenomenology of human understanding. Pickwick, Eugene

    Google Scholar 

  • Gearty MR (2009) Exploring carbon reduction through tales of vision, chance and determination: developing learning histories in an inter-organizational context. Ph.D. thesis. Centre for Action Research in Professional Practice, School of Management, University of Bath

  • Gearty M, Williams M, Pivcevic P, & Reason P (2013) Piloting digital storytelling and action research as an approach to stimulate pro-environmental advocacy and behaviour change (DEFRA EVO522). Retrieved from London: http://randd.defra.gov.uk/Document.aspx? Document=11187_DefraEVO522DigitalStorytellers_FinalReport_ForClearance_February2013.pdf

  • Gearty MR (2014) Learning history. In: Coghlan D, Brydon-Miller M (eds) The Sage encyclopedia of action research. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gearty MR, Bradbury-Huang H, Reason P (2015) Learning history in an open system: creating histories for sustainable futures. Manag Learn 46:44–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heron J (1996) Cooperative inquiry. Sage, Thousaand Oaks

  • Kleiner A, Roth G (1997) How to make experience your company’s best teacher, Harvard Business Review, September–October, 172–177

  • Kleiner A, Roth G (2000) Oil change: perspectives on corporate transformation. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lonergan BJ (2017) Natural right and historical mindedness. In: Lonergan BJ (ed) The collected works of Bernard Lonergan, (Vol 16). Toronto University Press, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre A (1981) After virtue: a study in moral theory. Notre Dame Press, South Bend

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall J (2016) First person action research: living life as inquiry. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead G, Marshall J (2005) Editorial special issue on reflective practice and first person action research. Action Res 3:235–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pasmore WA, Woodman R (2017) The future of research and practice in organizational change and development. In: Shani AB (Rami), Noumair D (eds) Research in organizational change and development, (Vol 25). Emerald, Brinkley

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasmore WA, Woodman R, Simmons AL (2008) Toward a more rigorous, reflective, and relevant science of collaborative management research. In: Shani AB (Rami), Mohrman SA, Pasmore WA, Stymn B, Adler N (eds) Handbook of collaborative management research. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason P, Bradbury H (2008) The sage handbook of action research, 2nd edn. Sage, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reason P, Torbert WR (2001) The action turn: toward a transformational social science. Concepts Transform 6:1–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reason P, Coleman G, Ballard D, Williams M, Gearty MR, Bond C, Seeley C, Maughan Mclachlan E (2009) Insider voices: human dimensions of low carbon technology. University of Bath, Centre for Action Research in Professional Practice

  • Roth G, Kleiner A (1998) Developing organizational memory through learning histories. Organ Dyn, Autumn 27:43–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth G, Kleiner A (2000) Car launch: the human side of managing change. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Scolari L, Coghlan D, Shani AB (Rami) (2015) Sense making in collaborative management research: Insights from an Italian social cooperative. In: Shani AB (Rami), Noumair D (eds) Research in organizational change and development (Vol 23). Emerald, Bingley

    Google Scholar 

  • Siry C, Ali-Khan C (2011) Writing we: Collaborative text in educational research. Critical pedagogy in the 21st century

  • Sumara DJ, Luce-Kapler R (1993) Action research as a writerly text: locating colabouring in collaboration.. Educational. Action Res 1:387–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torbert WR (1998) Developing courage and wisdom in organizing and in sciencing. In: Srivastva S (ed) Executive wisdom and organizational change. The New Lexington Press, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin S, Gustavsen B (1996) Beyond theory. John Benjamins, Amsterdam

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Van Maanen J (1998) Tales of the field. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Margaret Rose Gearty.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gearty, M.R., Coghlan, D. The First-, Second- and Third-Person Dynamics of Learning History. Syst Pract Action Res 31, 463–478 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-017-9436-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-017-9436-5

Keywords

Navigation