Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Does Environmental Compliance Pay?

  • Published:
Ecotoxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines the relationship between the environmental compliance and financial performance of large US companies. The environmental performance is measured in penalties assessed for violations of environmental regulations. The financial performance is represented by the profit margins. The regression models developed in this paper suggest that the degrees of environmental compliance have a positive influence on the profit margins. Conventional economic wisdom is that regulations impose costs and restrictions and, therefore, put companies at a competitive disadvantage. However, this paper is consistent with the proponents of environmental regulations who argue that tough regulations force companies to be innovative and as a result make them more productive.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abelson, P.H. (1993) Regulatory costs. Science 259(5092), 159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council on Environmental Quality (1993) Environmental Quality: The Twenty-third Annual Report, pp. 81–90. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, W.B. and Shadbegian, R.J. (1995) Pollution Abatement Costs, Regulation, and Plant-level Productivity. Washington, D.C., National Bureau of Economic Research. Working paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Investor Responsibility Research Center (1993) Corporate Environmental Profiles Directory. Washington, DC: Investor Responsibility Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinsey & Company (1994) The corporate response to the environmental challenge. In Transnational environmental law and its impact on corporate behavior (E.J. Urbani, C.P. Rubin and M. Kateman, eds) pp. 217–62. Irvington-on-Hudson, NY: Transnational Juris Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.E. (1990) The competitive advantage of nations. Harvard Business Review 74, 87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.E. and van der Linde, C. (1995) Green and competitive. Harvard Business Review, 120–34.

  • Tietenberg, T.H. (1991) Introduction and overview. In Innovation in environmental policy (T.H. Tietenberg, ed.) pp. 9–10. Brookfield, VT: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Environmental Protection Agency (1994) 1992 Toxics Release Inventory: Public Data Release, p. 183. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walley, N. and Whitehead, B. (1994) It's not easy being green. Harvard Business Review 46–52.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Lubin School of Business, Pace University, PO Drawer E, Aiken, SC, NY 10038, New York, USA

    Vasanthakumar N. Bhat

Authors
  1. Vasanthakumar N. Bhat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bhat, V.N. Does Environmental Compliance Pay?. Ecotoxicology 7, 221–225 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008938811813

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008938811813

Search

Navigation