Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The influence of environmental regulations on business innovation, intellectual capital, environmental and economic performance

  • Published:
Environment Systems and Decisions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Currently, there are two main trends in the field of corporate environmental management regarding the role of environmental regulations in corporate environmental and economic performance. The first trend examines environmental regulations such as barriers or risks of corporate operations since they increase the adaptation and compliance costs which negatively influence their competitive advantage. The second trend examines the potential positive effects of environmental regulations on firms’ operations like reduction in operational costs, creation of intellectual capital and enhancement of economic performance. In this debate, this paper examines a set of hypotheses to analyze the relationships between environmental regulations and various aspects of corporate performance. Hypotheses are tested by utilizing information disclosed in a sample of 100 sustainability reports published by 25 firms in the metal products sector over a four-year period. To collect all the necessary non-financial information a methodological framework was used which is based on a scoring system and a set of indicators derived from GRI guidelines and the relevant literature, while well-known financial indicators were used to assess firms’ economic performance. The findings show positive relationships between the environmental performance and the level of corporate compliance with environmental legislation as well as between corporate environmental innovation and environmental performance. There is also a positive correlation between the level of corporate compliance with environmental legislation and components of green intellectual capital.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ambec S, Barla P (2006) Can environmental regulations be good for business? An assessment of the Porter hypothesis. Energy Stud Rev 14(2):42

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambec S, Cohen MA, Elgie S, Lanoie P (2013) The Porter hypothesis at 20: can environmental regulation enhance innovation and competitiveness? Rev Environ Econ Policy 7(1):2–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen MM (2006) Eco-innovation indicators. Workshop: developing eco-innovation indicators. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • Avrampou A, Skouloudis A, Iliopoulos G, Khan N (2019) Advancing the sustainable development goals: evidence from leading European banks. Sustain Dev 27(4):743–757

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker RA (2005) Air pollution abatement costs under the Clean Air Act: evidence from the PACE survey. J Environ Econ Manag 50(1):144–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry MA, Rondinelli DA (1998) Proactive corporate environmental management: a new industrial revolution. Acad Manag Perspect 12(2):38–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Brouwers R, Schoubben F, Van Hulle C, Van Uytbergen S (2014) The link between corporate environmental performance and corporate value: a literature review. Rev Bus Econ Lit 58(4):343–374

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantele S, Tsalis T, Nikolaou I (2018) A new framework for assessing the sustainability reporting disclosure of water utilities. Sustainability 10(2):433

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrión-Flores CE, Innes R (2010) Environmental innovation and environmental performance. J Environ Econ Manag 59(1):27–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Chahal H, Bakshi P (2015) Examining intellectual capital and competitive advantage relationship: role of innovation and organizational learning. Int J Bank Market 33:376–399

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhry NI, Bilal A, Awan MU, Bashir A (2016) The role of environmental consciousness, green intellectual capital management and competitive advantage on financial performance of the firms: an evidence from manufacturing sector of Pakistan. J Qual Technol Manag 13:51–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen YS (2008) The positive effect of green intellectual capital on competitive advantages of firms. J Bus Ethics 77(3):271–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiou TY, Chan HK, Lettice F, Chung SH (2011) The influence of greening the suppliers and green innovation on environmental performance and competitive advantage in Taiwan. Transp Res E 47(6):822–836

    Google Scholar 

  • Daddi T, Giacomo MRD, Testa F, Frey M, Iraldo F (2014) The effects of integrated pollution prevention and control (IPPC) regulation on company management and competitiveness. Bus Strat Environ 23(8):520–533

    Google Scholar 

  • Damodaran A (2007) Return on capital (ROC), return on invested capital (ROIC) and return on equity (ROE): measurement and implications. SSRN Electron J. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1105499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean TJ, Brown RL, Stango V (2000) Environmental regulation as a barrier to the formation of small manufacturing establishments: a longitudinal examination. J Environ Econ Manag 40(1):56–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Delgado-Verde M, Amores-Salvadó J, Martín-de Castro G, Navas-López JE (2014) Green intellectual capital and environmental product innovation: the mediating role of green social capital. Knowl Manag Res Pract 12(3):261–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Demertzidis N, Tsalis TA, Loupa G, Nikolaou IE (2015) A benchmarking framework to evaluate business climate change risks: a practical tool suitable for investors decision-making process. Clim Risk Manag 10:95–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson T, Preston LE (1995) The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence, and implications. Acad Manag Rev 20(1):65–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Doran J, Ryan G (2012) Regulation and firm perception, eco-innovation and firm performance. Eur J Innov Manag 15(4):421–441

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumay J, Rooney J, Marini L (2013) An intellectual capital-based differentiation theory of innovation practice. J Intell Cap 14(4):608–633

    Google Scholar 

  • Earnhart D, Lizal L (2010) Effect of corporate economic performance on firm-level environmental performance, in a transition economy. Environ Resour Econ 46(3):303–329

    Google Scholar 

  • EC (2000) Directive 2000/53/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 September 2000 on end-of life vehicles: commission statements. European Commission, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Eiadat Y, Kelly A, Roche F, Eyadat H (2008) Green and competitive? An empirical test of the mediating role of environmental innovation strategy. J World Bus 43(2):131–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Filbeck G, Gorman RF (2004) The relationship between the environmental and financial performance of public utilities. Environ Resour Econ 29(2):137–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford JA, Steen J, Verreynne ML (2014) How environmental regulations affect innovation in the Australian oil and gas industry: going beyond the Porter Hypothesis. J Clean Prod 84:204–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman AM, Haveman RH (1972) Residuals charges for pollution control: a policy evaluation. Science 177(4046):322–329

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier J (2013) Institutional theory and corporate sustainability: determinant versus interactive approaches. Org Manag J 10(2):86–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) (2020) Sustainability disclosure database data legend. Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray WB, Shadbegian RJ (2003) Plant vintage, technology, and environmental regulation. J Environ Econ Manag 46(3):384–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunarathne N, Lee KH (2019) Institutional pressures and corporate environmental management maturity. Manag Environ Qual. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-02-2018-0041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han Y, Li D (2015) Effects of intellectual capital on innovative performance: the role of knowledge-based dynamic capability. Manag Decis 53(1):40–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyes A (2009) Is environmental regulation bad for competition? A survey. J Regul Econ 36(1):1–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilliard R (2004) Conflicting views: Neoclassical, porterian, and evolutionary approaches to the analysis of the environmental regulation of industrial activity. J Econ Issues 38(2):509–517

    Google Scholar 

  • Hockerts K (2015) A cognitive perspective on the business case for corporate sustainability. Bus Strat Environ 24(2):102–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Honkasalo N, Rodhe H, Dalhammar C (2005) Environmental permitting as a driver for eco-efficiency in the dairy industry: a closer look at the IPPC directive. J Clean Prod 13(10–11):1049–1060

    Google Scholar 

  • Horváthová E (2012) The impact of environmental performance on firm performance: short-term costs and long-term benefits? Ecol Econ 84:91–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain P, Vyas V, Roy A (2017) Exploring the mediating role of intellectual capital and competitive advantage on the relation between CSR and financial performance in SMEs. Soc Responsib J. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-04-2015-0048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones P, Comfort D, Hillier D (2016) Managing materiality: a preliminary examination of the adoption of the new GRI G4 guidelines on materiality within the business community. J Public Affairs 16(3):222–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagan RA, Gunningham N, Thornton D (2003) Explaining corporate environmental performance: how does regulation matter? Law Soc Rev 37(1):51–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Khanna M, Anton WRQ (2002) Corporate environmental management: regulatory and market-based incentives. Land Econ 78(4):539–558

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim K (2018) Proactive versus reactive corporate environmental practices and environmental performance. Sustainability 10(1):97

    Google Scholar 

  • Kneller R, Manderson E (2012) Environmental regulations and innovation activity in UK manufacturing industries. Resour Energy Econ 34(2):211–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee TS, Tsai HJ (2005) The effects of business operation mode on market orientation, learning orientation and innovativeness. Indust Manag Data Syst. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570510590147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li R, Ramanathan R (2018) Exploring the relationships between different types of environmental regulations and environmental performance: evidence from China. J Clean Prod 196:1329–1340

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Y (2014) Environmental innovation practices and performance: moderating effect of resource commitment. J Clean Prod 66:450–458

    Google Scholar 

  • Liao Z (2018) Corporate culture, environmental innovation and financial performance. Bus Strat Environ 27(8):1368–1375

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu CC (2010) Developing green intellectual capital in companies by AHP. In 2010 8th International Conference on Supply Chain Management and Information (pp. 1–5). IEEE, Hong Kong, 6–8 Oct, 2010

  • Long X, Chen Y, Du J, Oh K, Han I, Yan J (2017) The effect of environmental innovation behavior on economic and environmental performance of 182 Chinese firms. J Clean Prod 166:1274–1282

    Google Scholar 

  • Mårtensson K, Westerberg K (2016) Corporate environmental strategies towards sustainable development. Bus Strat Environ 25(1):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Miao Z, Baležentis T, Tian Z, Shao S, Geng Y, Wu R (2019) Environmental performance and regulation effect of China’s atmospheric pollutant emissions: evidence from “three regions and ten urban agglomerations.” Environ Resour Econ 74(1):211–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Morhardt JE, Baird S, Freeman K (2002) Scoring corporate environmental and sustainability reports using GRI 2000, ISO 14031 and other criteria. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 9(4):215–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakhaei H, Hamid NB (2013) The relationship between economic value added, return on assets, and return on equity with market value added in Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE). Proc Glob Bus Financ Res Conf 16(11):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikolaou IE (2019) A framework to explicate the relationship between CSER and financial performance: an intellectual capital-based approach and knowledge-based view of firm. J Knowl Econ 10(4):1427–1446

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikolaou IE, Tsalis TA (2013) Development of a sustainable balanced scorecard framework. Ecol Ind 34:76–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikolaou IE, Nikolaidou MK, Tsagarakis KP (2016) The response of small and medium-sized enterprises to potential water risks: an eco-cluster approach. J Clean Prod 112:4550–4557

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikolaou IE, Kourouklaris G, Tsalis TA (2014) A framework to assist the financial community in incorporating water risks into their investment decisions. J Sustain Financ Invest 4(2):93–109

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD/Eurostat (2005) Oslo Manual, Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data. Paris: OECD

  • Porter M, Van der Linde C (1995a) Green and competitive: ending the stalemate. The Dynamics of the eco-efficient economy: environmental regulation and competitive advantage. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, p 33

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter ME, Van der Linde C (1995b) Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. J Econ Perspect 9(4):97–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Potrich L, Cortimiglia MN, de Medeiros JF (2019) A systematic literature review on firm-level proactive environmental management. J Environ Manag 243:273–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Proctor T (1998) Innovations in time: what can we learn from history? Creativ Innov Manag 7(4):204–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Przychodzen J, Przychodzen W (2015) Relationships between eco-innovation and financial performance–evidence from publicly traded companies in Poland and Hungary. J Clean Prod 90:253–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramanathan R, Black A, Nath P, Muyldermans L (2010) Impact of environmental regulations on innovation and performance in the UK industrial sector. Manage Decis 48(10):1493–1513. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741011090298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramanathan R, He Q, Black A, Ghobadian A, Gallear D (2017) Environmental regulations, innovation and firm performance: a revisit of the Porter hypothesis. J Clean Prod 155:79–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramiah V, Pichelli J, Moosa I (2015) The effects of environmental regulation on corporate performance: a Chinese perspective. Rev Pac Basin Financ Market Policies 18(04):1550026

    Google Scholar 

  • Rassier DG, Earnhart D (2010) Does the porter hypothesis explain expected future financial performance? The effect of clean water regulation on chemical manufacturing firms. Environ Resour Econ 45(3):353–377

    Google Scholar 

  • Rennings K, Rammer C (2011) The impact of regulation-driven environmental innovation on innovation success and firm performance. Ind Innov 18(03):255–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Rennings K, Ziegler A, Ankele K, Hoffmann E (2006) The influence of different characteristics of the EU environmental management and auditing scheme on technical environmental innovations and economic performance. Ecol Econ 57(1):45–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Rexhäuser S, Rammer C (2014) Environmental innovations and firm profitability: unmasking the Porter hypothesis. Environ Resour Econ 57(1):145–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Riahi-Belkaoui A (2003) Intellectual capital and firm performance of US multinational firms. J Intell Cap. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.365580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubashkina Y, Galeotti M, Verdolini E (2015) Environmental regulation and competitiveness: empirical evidence on the Porter Hypothesis from European manufacturing sectors. Energy Policy 83:288–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez CM (1997) Environmental regulation and firm level innovation: The moderating effects of organizational and individual level variables. Bus Soc 36(2):140–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkis J, Cordeiro JJ (2001) An empirical evaluation of environmental efficiencies and firm performance: pollution prevention versus end-of-pipe practice. Eur J Oper Res 135(1):102–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger S, Synnestvedt T (2002) The link between ‘green’ and economic success: environmental management as the crucial trigger between environmental and economic performance. J Environ Manage 65(4):339–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger S, Hörisch J, Freeman RE (2019) Business cases for sustainability: a stakeholder theory perspective. Org Environ 32(3):191–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwens C, Wagner M (2019) The role of firm-internal corporate environmental standards for organizational performance. J Bus Econ 89(7):823–843

    Google Scholar 

  • Skouloudis A, Evangelinos K, Kourmousis F (2009) Development of an evaluation methodology for triple bottom line reports using international standards on reporting. Environ Manag 44(2):298–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith A, Sorrell S (2001) Interaction between environmental policy instruments: carbon emissions trading and integrated pollution prevention and control. Int J Environ Pollut 15(1):22–41

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith M, Crotty J (2008) Environmental regulation and innovation driving ecological design in the UK automotive industry. Bus Strat Environ 17(6):341–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Steurer R, Langer ME, Konrad A, Martinuzzi A (2005) Corporations, stakeholders and sustainable development I: a theoretical exploration of business–society relations. J Bus Ethics 61(3):263–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Stranieri S, Orsi L, Banterle A, Ricci EC (2019) Sustainable development and supply chain coordination: the impact of corporate social responsibility rules in the European Union food industry. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 26(2):481–491

    Google Scholar 

  • Theyel G (2000) Management practices for environmental innovation and performance. Int J Oper Prod Manag 20(2):249–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsalis TA, Malamateniou KE, Koulouriotis D, Nikolaou IE (2020) New challenges for corporate sustainability reporting: United Nations’ 2030 Agenda for sustainable development and the sustainable development goals. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 27(4):1617–1629

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsalis TA, Nikolaou IE, Tsagarakis KP (2020) A benchmarking–scoring methodology for assessing the water risk disclosures of water utilities. Environ Dev Sustain 22(7):6473–6493

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsalis TA, Stylianou MS, Nikolaou IE (2018) Evaluating the quality of corporate social responsibility reports: the case of occupational health and safety disclosures. Saf Sci 109:313–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsireme AI, Nikolaou EI, Georgantzis N, Tsagarakis KP (2012) The influence of environmental policy on the decisions of managers to adopt G-SCM practices. Clean Technol Environ Policy 14(5):953–964

    Google Scholar 

  • Vatalis KI (2017) Training sustainability through role playing in higher education. Prog Ind Ecol 11(4):361–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Vatalis KI, Laaksonen A, Charalampides G, Benetis NP (2012) Intermediate technologies towards low-carbon economy. the Greek zeolite CCS outlook into the EU commitments. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16:3391–3400

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vatalis KI (2010) Evaluation of sustainability by a population living near fossil fuel resources in Northwestern Greece. J Environ Manage 91(12):2581–2589

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner M (2010) The role of corporate sustainability performance for economic performance: a firm-level analysis of moderation effects. Ecol Econ 69(7):1553–1560

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner M, Schaltegger S (2004) The effect of corporate environmental strategy choice and environmental performance on competitiveness and economic performance: an empirical study of EU manufacturing. Eur Manag J 22(5):557–572

    Google Scholar 

  • Wernerfelt B (1984) A resource-based view of the value added statement is South Africa. Manag Financ 24:45–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu WY, Chang ML, Chen CW (2008) Promoting innovation through the accumulation of intellectual capital, social capital, and entrepreneurial orientation. R&D Manag 38(3):265–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie X, Huo J, Zou H (2019) Green process innovation, green product innovation, and corporate financial performance: a content analysis method. J Bus Res 101:697–706

    Google Scholar 

  • Yadava RN, Sinha B (2016) Scoring sustainability reports using GRI 2011 guidelines for assessing environmental, economic, and social dimensions of leading public and private Indian companies. J Bus Ethics 138(3):549–558

    Google Scholar 

  • Yadiati W, Nissa N, Paulus S, Suharman H, Meiryani M (2019) The role of green intellectual capital and organizational reputation in influencing environmental performance. Int J Energy Econ Policy 9(3):261

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan B, Ren S, Chen X (2017) Can environmental regulation promote the coordinated development of economy and environment in China’s manufacturing industry?: a panel data analysis of 28 sub-sectors. J Clean Prod 149:11–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Yusliza MY, Yong JY, Tanveer MI, Ramayah T, Faezah JN, Muhammad Z (2020) A structural model of the impact of green intellectual capital on sustainable performance. J Clean Prod 249:119–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeng SX, Meng XH, Zeng RC, Tam CM, Tam VW, Jin T (2011) How environmental management driving forces affect environmental and economic performance of SMEs: a study in the Northern China district. J Clean Prod 19(13):1426–1437

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao S, Liu Y, Zhou L (2020) How does a boundaryless mindset enhance expatriate job performance? The mediating role of proactive resource acquisition tactics and the moderating role of behavioural cultural intelligence. Int J Human Resour Manag 31(10):1333–1357

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao X, Zhao Y, Zeng S, Zhang S (2015) Corporate behavior and competitiveness: impact of environmental regulation on Chinese firms. J Clean Prod 86:311–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu Q, Sarkis J, Lai KH (2007) Green supply chain management: pressures, practices and performance within the Chinese automobile industry. J Clean Prod 15(11–12):1041–1052

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Business Economics and Environmental Technology Lab, Department of Environmental Engineering, Democritus University of Thrace, Xanthi, Greece

    Nikolaos S. Trevlopoulos, Thomas A. Tsalis, Konstantinos P. Tsagarakis & Ioannis E. Nikolaou

  2. Department of Environment, University of the Aegean, Xenia Building, Mytilini, Greece

    Konstantinos I. Evangelinos

  3. Department of Mineral Resources Engineering, University of Western Macedonia, Koila, 50100, Kozani, Greece

    Konstantinos I. Vatalis

Authors
  1. Nikolaos S. Trevlopoulos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Thomas A. Tsalis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Konstantinos I. Evangelinos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Konstantinos P. Tsagarakis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Konstantinos I. Vatalis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ioannis E. Nikolaou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ioannis E. Nikolaou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Trevlopoulos, N.S., Tsalis, T.A., Evangelinos, K.I. et al. The influence of environmental regulations on business innovation, intellectual capital, environmental and economic performance. Environ Syst Decis 41, 163–178 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-021-09802-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-021-09802-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation