Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of Swedish woodland key habitats using red-listed bryophytes and lichens

  • Published:
Biodiversity & Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

All Swedish forest land is at present being surveyed with the aim of mapping woodland key habitats which have an estimated number of ca. 70 000. An untested requirement of these habitats is that they should contain red-listed species. In order to investigate if they fulfill their aim, an inventory of nationally red-listed bryophytes and lichens was performed in ca. 120 randomly selected woodland key habitats distributed throughout the country. The species were recorded in line transects, covering the whole surface of the habitats. The mean number of red-listed species per habitat was 0.7 for bryophytes and 1.4 for lichens with 11 species at the richest site and 71% of the sites having at least one species. Nemoral forests and coniferous forests were the most species-rich habitat types. The habitats of northern Sweden were more species rich than the southern ones. There were weak correlations between presence of bryophytes and lichens. The study shows that a majority of the woodland key habitats contain red-listed bryophyte and lichen species. Further studies are needed in order to record more organism groups and to compare the woodland key habitats with the surrounding matrix forests.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aronsson M, Hallingbäck T and Mattson JE (eds) (1995) Rödlistade växter i Sverige 1995. Artdatabanken Uppsala [in Swedish with English summary]

    Google Scholar 

  • Auzins R and Ek T Project plan for inventory of Woodland by Habitats. State Forest Service Latvia. Riga (in preparation)

  • Berg Å, Ehnström B, Gustafsson L, Hallingbäck T, Jonsell M and Weslien J (1994) Threatened plant, animal, and fungus species in Swedish forest: Distribution and habitat associations. Conservation Biology 8: 718–731

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernes C (ed.) (1994) Biological diversity in Sweden. A country study. Monitor 14. Naturvårdsverkets förlag, Solna

  • Dobson AP, Rodriguez JP, Roberts WM and Wilcove DS (1997) Geographic distribution of endangered species in the United States. Science 275: 550–553

    Google Scholar 

  • Esseen PA, Ehnström B, Ericson L and Sjöberg K (1997) Boreal forests. In: Hansson L ed. Boreal Ecosystems and Landscapes: Structures, Processes and Conservation of Biodiversity, Ecological Bulletins 46, pp 16–47. Munksgaard, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallingbäck T (1991) Mossor som indikerar skyddsvärd skog. Svensk Bot. Tidskr. 85: 321–384 [in Swedish with English abstract]

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallingbäck T and Weibull H (1996) En värdepyramid för naturvårdsbedömning av ädellövskog. Svensk Bot. Tidskr. 90: 129–140 [in Swedish with English abstract]

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatchwell BJ, Chamberlain DE and Perrins CM (1996) The demography of blackbirds Turdus merula in rural habitats; Is farmland a sub-optimal habitat? Journal of Applied Ecology 33: 1114–1124

    Google Scholar 

  • Hultgren B (1995) Kontrolltaxering av nyckelbiotoper. Meddelande 1995-3. Skogsstyrelsen. Jönköping [in Swedish with English summary]

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonsell M, Weslien J and Ehnström B (1998) Substrate requirements of red-listed saproxylic invertebrates in Sweden. Biodiversity and Conservation 7: 749–764

    Google Scholar 

  • Mádail F and Quézel P (1997) Hot-spots analysis for conservation of plant biodiversity in the Mediterranean basin. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Gardens 84: 112–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Meriluoto M (1995) Metsäluonnon arvokkaat elinympäristöt. Tunnistaminen ja hoitosuositukset. Metsäkeskus Tapion julkaisu 12/1995 [in Finnish]

  • National Board of Forestry (1997) Naturskydd och naturhänsyn i skogen. Meddelande 1-1997. Jönköping [in Swedish]

  • National Board of Forestry (1998a) Nyckelbiotoper. Jönköping [in Swedish]

  • National Board of Forestry (1998b) Skoglig statistikinformation 1998:15. Jönköping [in Swedish]

  • Nilsson NE (ed) (1990) The Forests. National Atlas of Sweden. SNA Publishing, Stockholm

  • Nilsson SG (1997) Biologisk mångfald under tusen år i det sydsvenska kulturlandskapet. Svensk Bot. Tidskr. 91: 85–101 [in Swedish with English summary]

    Google Scholar 

  • Nitare J and Norén M (1992) Nyckelbiotoper kartläggs i nytt projekt vid Skogsstyrelsen. Svensk Bot. Tidskr. 86: 219–226 [in Swedish with English abstract]

    Google Scholar 

  • Norén M, Hultgren B, Nitare J and Bergengren I (1995) Instruktion för Datainsamling vid inventering av nyckelbiotoper. National Board of Forestry. Jönköping [in Swedish]

    Google Scholar 

  • Östlund L (1993) Exploitation and structural changes in the north Swedish boreal forest 1800–1992. PhD thesis, Department of Forest Vegetation Ecology. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS (1987) SAS/STAT guide for personal computers. Version 6. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tibell L (1992) Crustose lichens as indicators of forest continuity in boreal coniferous forests. Nordic Journal of Botany 12: 427–450

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gustafsson, L., De Jong, J. & Noréng, M. Evaluation of Swedish woodland key habitats using red-listed bryophytes and lichens. Biodiversity and Conservation 8, 1101–1114 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008934526658

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008934526658

Navigation