Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of Transmission Ability of Barley Yellow Dwarf Virus-PAV Isolates by Different Populations of Rhopalosiphum padi and Sitobion avenae

  • Published:
European Journal of Plant Pathology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Populations of two aphid species from different geographic regions of Morocco were tested for their ability to transmit five barley yellow dwarf virus-PAV (BYDV-PAV) type isolates using Clintland 64 oat as the test plant. Transmission efficiencies were determined for 10 sub-populations of Rhopalosiphum padi and 12 sub-populations of Sitobion avenae. After a short acquisition access period (AAP) of 4 h, all populations transmitted the virus but with different efficiencies. R. padi (Rp-S) and S. avenae (Sa-S) collected in the Settat region were the most efficient vectors, with transmission rates of 38% and 27%, respectively. R. padi (Rp-C) collected at Chaouen and S. avenae (Sa-B) at Berkane, were poor transmitters with respective vectoring abilities of 20% and 16%. These four sub-populations were chosen to study the acquisition of BYDV-PAV and the retention of virus within aphids in more detail. The transmission after two AAPs of 4 h and 48 h were compared. Starved aphids given a 4 h AAP had significantly higher transmission efficiencies than non-starved aphids. However, after a 48 h AAP, no difference was observed in the transmission between starved and non-starved aphids. Intraspecific variability was also detected by means of serial transfers of individual aphids after the given AAP. Following the first day of serial transfers, no differences were observed in transmission efficiency and virus titers for sub-populations within each species acquiring the virus during 48 h, but there was significant variation when the virus was acquired in 4 h. The levels of PAV antigen retained by aphids fed on healthy plants declined rapidly during the first day after acquisition, but remained fairly constant during the next 5–7 days depending on the length of the AAP. Virus antigen could be detected by ELISA in Rp-S and Sa-S for up to 11 days of serial transfer, but it was shown that aphids could retain and transmit BYDV-PAV for at least 3 weeks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bencharki B, Mutterer J, El Yamani M, Ziegler-Graff V, Zaoui D and Jonard G (1999) Severity of infection of Moroccan barley yellow dwarf virus PAV isolates correlates with variability in their coat protein sequences. Annals of Applied Biology 134: 89–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdin D, Rouzé J, Tanguy S and Robert Y (1998) Variation among clones of Myzus persicae and Myzus nicotianae in the transmission of a poorly and a highly transmissible isolate of potato leafroll luteovirus (PLRV). Plant Pathology 47: 794–800

    Google Scholar 

  • D'Arcy CJ and Mayo MA (1997) Proposals for changes in luteovirus taxonomy and nomenclature. Archives in Virology 142: 1285–1287

    Google Scholar 

  • D'Arcy CJ, Domier L and Mayo MA (1999) Luteoviridae. In: Seventh Report of the International Committee on the Taxonomy of Viruses, Elsevier, New York, NY, (in press)

  • El Yamani M and Bencharki B (1997) Transmission of Moroccan isolates of barley yellow dwarf virus by the Russian wheat aphid (Diuraphis noxia) and other aphid species. Phytopathologia Mediterranea 36: 129–134

    Google Scholar 

  • El Yamani M and Hill JH (1990) Identification and importance of barley yellow dwarf virus in Morocco. Plant Disease 74: 291–294

    Google Scholar 

  • El Yamani M and Hill JH (1991) Aphid vectors of barley yellow dwarf virus in west-central Morocco. Journal of Phytopathology 133: 105–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Eweida M, Oxelfelt P and Tomenius K (1988) Concentration of virus and ultrastructural changes in oats at various stages of barley yellow dwarf virus infection. Annals of Applied Biology 112: 313–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Fargette D, Jenniskens M-J and Peters D (1982) Acquisition and transmission of pea enation mosaic virus by the individual pea aphid. Phytopathology 72: 1386–1390

    Google Scholar 

  • Gildow FE (1993) Evidence for receptor-mediated endocytosis regulating luteovirus acquisition by aphids. Phytopathology 83: 270–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Gildow FE and Gray SM (1993) The aphid salivary gland basal lamina as a selective barrier associated with vectorspecific transmission of barley yellow dwarf luteoviruses. Phytopathology 83: 1293–1302

    Google Scholar 

  • Gildow FE and Rochow WF (1980) Role of accessory salivary glands in aphid transmission of barley yellow dwarf luteovirus. Virology 104: 97–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Gildow FE and Rochow WF (1983) Barley yellow dwarf virus in California: vector competence and luteovirus identification. Plant Disease 67: 140–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill C and Chong J (1979) Cytopathological evidence for the division of barley yellow dwarf virus isolates into two subgroups. Virology 95: 33–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray SM (1996) Plant virus proteins involved in natural vector transmission. Trend in Microbiology 4: 259–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray SM, Power AG, Smith DM, Seaman AJ and Altman NS (1991) Aphid transmission of barley yellowdwarf virus: Acquisition access periods and virus concentration requirements. Phytopathology 81: 539–545

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray SM, Smith D and Altman N (1993) Barley yellow dwarf virus isolate-specific resistance in spring oats reduced virus accumulation and aphid transmission. Phytopathology 83: 716–720

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo JQ, Lapierre H and Moreau JP (1997a) Clonal variations and virus regulation by aphids in transmission of a French BYDVPAV isolate of barley yellow dwarf virus. Plant Disease 81: 570–575

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo JQ, Lapierre H and Moreau JP (1997b) Vectoring ability of aphid clones of Rhopalosiphum padi L. and Sitobion avenae Fabr. and their capacity to retain barley yellow dwarf virus. Annals of Applied Biology 131: 179–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin ME and Ruesink JM (1986) Epidemiology of barley yellow dwarf virus: a study in ecological complexity. Annual Review of Phytopathology 28: 393–424

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston RA and Rochow WF (1972) An isolate of barley yellow dwarf virus transmitted specifically by Schizaphis graminum. Phytopathology 62: 921–925

    Google Scholar 

  • Lei C-H, Lister RM, Vincent JR and Karanjkar MN (1995) SGV serotype isolates of barley yellow dwarf virus differing in vectors and molecular relationships. Phytopathology 85: 820–826

    Google Scholar 

  • Lister RM and Ranieri R (1995) Distribution and economic importance of barley yellow dwarf. In: D'Arcy CJ and Burnett PA (eds) Barley Yellow Dwarf: 40 Years of Progress (pp 29–53) American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, MN

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller WA and Rasochova L (1997) Barley yellow dwarf viruses. Annual Review of Phytopathology 35: 167–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy FA, Fauquet CM, Bishop DLH, Ghabrial SA, Jarvis AW, Martelli, GP, Mayo MA and Summers MD (1995) Virus taxonomy: classification and nomenclature of viruses. Sixth Report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (586 pp) Springer-Verlag, Wien, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Nault LR (1997) Arthropod transmission of plant viruses: a new synthesis. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 90: 521–541

    Google Scholar 

  • Peiffer ML, Gildow FE and Gray SM (1997) Two distinct mechanisms regulate luteovirus transmission efficiency and specificity at the aphid salivary gland. Journal of General Virology 78: 495–503

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters D and Elderson J (1984) Some observations on the mechanism of the persistent virus transmission-study with potato leafroll virus. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 33: 238–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirone TP and Harris KF (1977) Nonpersistent transmission of plant viruses by aphids. Annual Review of Phytopathology 15: 55–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell G (1993) The effect of the pre-acquisition starvation on aphid transmission of potyviruses during observed and electrically recorded stylet penetrations. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 66: 255–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Power AG, Seaman AJ and Gray SM (1991) Aphid transmission of barley yellow dwarf virus: inoculation access period and epidemiological implications. Phytopathology 81: 545–548

    Google Scholar 

  • Rochow WF (1960) Specialization among greenbugs in the transmission of barley yellow dwarf virus. Phytopathology 50: 881–884

    Google Scholar 

  • Rochow WF (1969) Biological properties of four isolates of barley yellow dwarf virus. Phytopathology 59: 1580–1589

    Google Scholar 

  • Rochow WF and Carmichael LE (1979) Specificity among barley yellow dwarf virus in enzyme immunosorbent assays.Virology 95: 415–520

    Google Scholar 

  • Rochow WF and Eastop FV (1966) Variation within Rhopalosiphum padi and transmission of barley yellow dwarf virus by clones of four aphid species. Virology 30: 286–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Rochow WF and Muller I (1971) A fifth variant of barley yellow dwarf virus in New York. Plant Disease 55: 874–877

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadeghi E, Dedryver CA and Gauthier JP (1997a) Role of acquisition and inoculation time in the expression of clonal variation for BYDV-PAV transmission in the aphid species Rhopalosiphum padi L. Plant Pathology 46: 502–508

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadeghi E, Dedryver CA, Riault g and Gauthier JP (1997b) Variation in transmission of two BYDV-MAV isolates by multiple clones of Rhopalosiphum padi L. European Journal of Plant Pathology 103: 515–519

    Google Scholar 

  • Saksena KN, Singh SR and Sill WH (1964) Transmission of barley yellow dwarf virus by four biotypes of Rhopalosiphum padi (L) Journal of Economic Entomology 57: 569–571

    Google Scholar 

  • Shukle RM, Lampe DJ, Lister RM and Foster JE (1987) Aphid feeding behavior: relationship to barley yellow dwarf virus resistance in Agropyron species. Phytopathology 77: 725–729

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamada T and Harisson BD (1981) Quantitative study on the uptake and retention of potato leafroll virus by aphids in laboratory and field conditions. Annuals of Applied Biology 98: 261–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Heuvel JFJM, Verbeek M and Peters D (1993) The relationship between aphid-transmissibility of potato leafroll virus and surface epitopes of the viral capsid. Phytopathology 83: 1125–1129

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Heuvel JFJM, Verbeek M and van der Wilk F (1994) Endosymbiotic bacteria associated with circulative of potato leafroll virus by Myzus percisae. Journal of General Virology 75: 2559–2565

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Heuvel JFJM, Bruyère A, Hohenhout SA, Ziegler-Graff V, Brault V, Verbeek M, van der Wilk F and Richards K (1997) The N-terminal region of the luteovirus readthrough domain determines virus binding to Buchnera GroEL and is essential for virus persistence in the aphid. Journal of Virology 71: 7258–7265

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincent JR, Ueng P, Lister RM and Larkins BA (1990) Nucleotide sequences of coat protein genes for three isolates of barley yellow dwarf virus and their relationships to other luteovirus coat protein sequences. Journal of General Virology 71: 2791–2800

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang RY and Pirone TP (1996) Potyvirus transmission is not increased by pre-acquisition fasting of aphids reared on artificial diet. Journal of General Virology 77: 3145–3148

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterhouse PM, Gerlach WL and Miller WA (1986) Serotype-specific and general luteovirus probes and cloned cDNA sequences of barley yellow dwarf virus. Journal of General Virology 67: 1273–1281

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bencharki, B., Yamani, M.E. & Zaoui, D. Assessment of Transmission Ability of Barley Yellow Dwarf Virus-PAV Isolates by Different Populations of Rhopalosiphum padi and Sitobion avenae. European Journal of Plant Pathology 106, 455–464 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008749231129

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008749231129

Navigation