Abstract
In contrast to what used to be conventional wisdom among economists,several recent contributions have shown that in-kind transfersschemes can be welfare-improving in the presence of distortionarytaxes (usually, linear taxes or a general income tax). In thisnote, we extend previous work by considering the most generaltax system compatible with reasonable information constraints,i.e. a mix of linear indirect and non-linear direct taxes. Threemain results are noted. We find that in the presence of a mixedtax system (as opposed to the non-linear income tax alone): i) not only encouraged but also discouraged goods satisfy a conditionfor the desirability of public provision; ii) there is a tendencyfor the optimal level of in-kind transfers to be lower; iii)there is a basic equivalence between uniform and income-contingentin-kind transfers. We also show how previous results can be derivedas special cases of ours and others have to be modified to accountfor the mixed tax system.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderberg, D. (1999). Social Insurance with In-kind Transfers of Private Goods. mimeo, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK.
Atkinson, A. and J. Stiglitz. (1976). “The Design of Tax Structure: Direct Versus Indirect Taxation.” Journal of Public Economics 1, 97-119.
Balestrino, A. (1999a). “The Desirability of In-kind Transfers in the Presence of Distortionary Taxes.” Journal of Economic Surveys 13, 333-354.
Balestrino, A. (1999b). “User Charges as Redistributive Devices.” Journal of Public Economic Theory 1, 511-524.
Besley, T. (1991). “Welfare-improving User Charges for Publicly Provided Private Goods.” Scandinavian Journal of Economics 93, 405-510.
Besley, T., and S. Coate. (1991). “Public Provision of Private Goods and the Redistribution of Income.” American Economic Review 81, 979-984.
Blackorby, C., and D. Donaldson. (1988). “Cash Versus Kind, Self Selection and Efficient Transfers.” American Economic Review 78, 691-700.
Blomquist, S., and V. Christiansen. (1995). “Public Provision of Private Goods as a Redistributive Device in an Optimum Income Tax Model.” Scandinavian Journal of Economics 97, 547-567.
Blomquist, S., and V. Christiansen. (1998a). “Price Subsidies Versus Public Provision.” International Tax and Public Finance 5, 283-306.
Blomquist, S., and V. Christiansen. (1998b). “Topping Up or Opting Out? The Optimal Design of Public Provision Schemes.” International Economic Review 39, 399-411.
Blomquist S., and V. Christiansen. (1999). “The Political Economy of Publicly Provided Private Goods.” Journal of Public Economics 73, 31-54.
Boadway, R., and M. Keen. (1993). “Public Good, Self-selection and Optimal Income Taxation.” International Economic Review 34, 463-478.
Boadway, R., and M. Marchand. (1995). “The Use of Public Expenditure for Distributive Purposes.” Oxford Economic Papers 47, 45-59.
Boadway, R., M. Marchand, and M. Sato. (1998). “Subsidies Versus Public Provision of Private Goods as Instruments for Redistribution.” Scandinavian Journal of Economics 100, 545-564.
Bruce, N., and M. Waldman. (1991). “Transfers in Kind: Why They Can be Efficient and Nonpaternalistic.” American Economic Review 81, 1345-1351.
Cremer, H., and F. Gahvari. (1997). “In-kind Transfers, Self-selection and Optimal Tax Policy.” European Economic Review 41, 97-114.
Edwards, J., M. Keen, and M. Tuomala. (1994). “Income Tax, Commodity Taxes and Public Good Provision: A Brief Guide.” Finanz Archiv 51, 472-487.
Gahvari, F. (1994). “In-kind Transfers, Cash Grants and Labour Supply.” Journal of Public Economics 55, 495-504.
Gahvari, F. (1995). “In-kind Versus Cash Transfers in the Presence of Distortionary Taxes.” Economic Inquiry 33, 45-53.
Guesnerie, R., and K. Roberts. (1984). “Effective Policy Tools and Quantity Controls.” Econometrica 52, 59-82.
Ireland, N. (1990). “The Mix of Social and Private Provision of Goods and Services.” Journal of Public Economics 43, 201-219.
Mirrlees, J. (1976). “Optimal Tax Theory: A Synthesis.” Journal of Public Economics 6, 327-358.
Myles, G. (1995). Public Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Munro, A. (1991). “The Optimal Public Provision of Private Goods.” Journal of Public Economics 44, 239-261.
Munro, A. (1992). “Self-selection and Optimal In-kind Transfers.” Economic Journal 102, 1184-1196.
Nava, M., F. Schroyen and M. Marchand. (1996). “Optimal Fiscal and Public Expenditure Policy in a Two-class Economy.” Journal of Public Economics 61, 119-37.
Neary, J., and K. Roberts. (1980). “The Theory of Household Behaviour Under Rationing.” European Economic Review 13, 25-42.
Nichols, A., and R. Zeckhauser. (1981). “Targeting Transfers Through Restrictions on Recipients.” American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 72, 372-277.
Pirttilä, J., and M. Tuomala. (1997). “Income Tax, Commodity Tax and Environmental Policy.” International Tax and Public Finance 4, 379-393.
Stiglitz, J. (1982). “Self-selection and Pareto-efficient Taxation.” Journal of Public Economics 17, 213-240.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Balestrino, A. Mixed Tax Systems and the Public Provision of Private Goods. International Tax and Public Finance 7, 463–478 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008729304743
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008729304743