Skip to main content
Log in

Interactions Between French Isolates of Phomopsis/Diaporthe Helianthi Munt.-Cvet. et al. and Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) Genotypes

  • Published:
European Journal of Plant Pathology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Three artificial infection tests measuring the rate of mycelial growth of 7 Phomopsis/Diaporthe helianthi isolates were used on leaves, stems and capitula of 6 sunflower hybrids. Isolates and hybrids were chosen to cover the range of variability and resistance levels known at the present time. Significant genotype and isolate effects and isolate×genotype interactions were shown in all the tests, with some changes in order of hybrids according to the isolate used for infection. Consequences of interactions in breeding for stable resistance to P./D. helianthi are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acimovic M and Straser N (1981) Phomopsis sp. a new parasite in sunflower. Helia 4: 43-58

    Google Scholar 

  • Atanassov Z, Nakamura C, Mori N, Kaneda C, Kato H, Jin YZ, Yoshizawa T and Murai K (1994) Mycotoxin production and pathogenicity of Fusarium species and wheat resistance to Fusarium head blight. Canadian Journal of Botany 72: 161-167

    Google Scholar 

  • Baergen KD, Hewitt JD and Saint-Clair DA (1993) Resistance of tomato genotypes to 4 isolates of Verticillium dahliae Race 2. HortScience 28: 833-836

    Google Scholar 

  • Benomar A (1995) A study of the mechanisms and genetics of sunflower resistance to phomopsis (Diaporthe helianthi). Int. Sunflower Yearbook (15A, 174 avenue Victor Hugo, 75116 Paris, France): 80-81 (Abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand F and Tourvieille D (1987) Phomopsis du tournesol: test de sélection. Inf. tech. CETIOM 98 I: 12-18

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardwell KF and Wehrly TE (1997) A rank test for distinguishing environmentally and genetically induced disease resistance in plant varieties. Biometrics 53: 195-206

    Google Scholar 

  • Carré MA (1993) Maladies du tournesol: le choix variétal avant tout. Cultivar 332: 46-51

    Google Scholar 

  • CETIOM (1996) Le tournesol en 1996. Edition Cetiom: 33 pp

  • Denoyes-Rothan B and Guérin G (1996) Comparison of six inoculation techniques with Colletotrichum acutatum on cold stored strawberry plants and screening for resistance to this fungus in French strawberry collections. European Journal of Plant Pathology 102: 615-621

    Google Scholar 

  • Guillaumin JJ, Kurek J, Lalande M and Ramirez A (1974) Inoculation de capitules de tournesol au laboratoire par Botrytis cinerea et essai de mise au point d'un test de sensibilité variétale. Proc. 6th Int. Sunflower Conf., Buchaust, Roumania: 655-659

  • Hamelin RC, Shain L and Thielges BA (1992) Adaptation of poplar leaf rust to Eastern cottonwood. Euphytica 62: 69-75

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamarque C and Perny RA (1985). Nouvelle maladie du tournesol: le phomopsis. Cultivar 179: 57-59

    Google Scholar 

  • Lespinas JL (1998) La protection contre le phomopsis reste une priorité. CETIOM-Oléoscope 45: 27

    Google Scholar 

  • Medianer T (1997) Breeding wheat and rye for resistance to Fusarium diseases. Plant Breeding 116: 201-220

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohammed C (1987) Etude comparée des 5 espèces européennes d'Armillaria appartenant au complexe mellea. Thèse de Doctorat: 208 pp

  • Muntanola-Cvetkovic M, Mihaljcevic M and Petrov M (1981) On the identity of the causative agent of a serious Phomopsis-Diaporthe disease in sunflower plants. Nova Hedwigia 34: 417-435

    Google Scholar 

  • Penaud A and Jouffret P (1996) Phomopsis du tournesol: la protection fongicide se raisonne. CETIOM-Oléoscope 33: 27-29

    Google Scholar 

  • Quenin H, Fayret J and Perny RA (1993) Le phomopsis sur capitule: un danger pour les semences? Cetiom — Oléoscope 18: 10-12

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid LM, Spaner D, Mather DE, Bolton AT and Hamilton RI (1993) Resistance of maize hybrids and inbreds following silk inoculation with three isolates of Fusarium graminearum. Plant Disease 77: 1248-1251

    Google Scholar 

  • Sah DN and Fehrmann H (1992) Virulence patterns of geographically differing isolates of Pyrenophora tritici-repentis and sources of resistance in wheat. Plant Disease 76: 712-716

    Google Scholar 

  • Tourvieille D and Guiard J (1992) Intérêts et limites des contaminations artificielles dans le jugement variétal. Coll. Int. d'Etude sur les contaminations artificielles des plantes, Arras 5 Nov.: 39-48

  • Tourvieille D, Vear F and Habouzit J (1986) Culture du tournesol sous tunnel en filet avec humectation contrôlée pour l'étude du Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Informations Techniques CETIOM 96: 20-28

    Google Scholar 

  • Tourvieille D, Vear F and Pelletier C (1988) Use of two mycelium tests in breeding sunflower resistance to phomopsis. In: Proc. 12th Int. Sunflower Conf., Novi Sad, Yougoslavia II pp 110-114

  • Vear F and Guillaumin JJ (1977) Etude de méthodes d'inoculation du tournesol par Sclerotinia sclerotiorum et application à la sélection. Ann. Amélior. Plantes 27: 523-537

    Google Scholar 

  • Vear F and Tourvieille D (1988) Heredity of resistance to Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in sunflowers. II. Study of capitulum resistance to natural and artificial ascospore infections. Agronomie 8: 503-508

    Google Scholar 

  • Vear F, Garreyn M and Tourvieille D (1997) Inheritance of resistance to phomopsis (Diaporthe helianthi) in sunflowers. Plant Breeding 116: 277-281

    Google Scholar 

  • Vranceanu AV, Csep N, Pirvu N and Stoenescu FM (1983) Genetic variability of sunflower reaction to the attack of Phomopsis helianthi Munt.-Cvet. et al. Helia 6: 23-25

    Google Scholar 

  • Vranceanu AV, Craiciu D, Soare G, Pacureanu M, Voinescu G and Sandu I (1994) Sunflower genetic resistance to Phomopsis helianthi (Munt.-Cvet. et al.) attack. Romanian Agricultural Research 1: 9-11

    Google Scholar 

  • Vukojevic J, Franic Mihajlovic D and Mihaljcevic M (1996) The comparative investigation of Phomopsis helianthi isolates from different european localities. In: Proceedings of 14th International Sunflower Conference, II, Beijing-Shenyang, P.R. China pp 734-738

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Viguié, A., Vear, F. & Tourvieille de Labrouhe, D. Interactions Between French Isolates of Phomopsis/Diaporthe Helianthi Munt.-Cvet. et al. and Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) Genotypes. European Journal of Plant Pathology 105, 693–702 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008715816205

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008715816205

Navigation