Skip to main content
Log in

How To Do Without Inductive Logic

  • Published:
Science & Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper defends deductivism, the view that the only valid arguments are deductivity valid arguments, and that deductive logic is the only logic that we have or need. Inductive arguments are construed as valid deductive enthymemes. Some of these, with general epistemic principles as missing premises, may be sound as well as valid – thus solving the philosophical problem of induction. But that problem is not to be trivialised by regarding the epistemic principles as analytic truths, as Pargetter and Bigelow have recently suggested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Fox, J.: 1996, 'Deductivism Surpassed', Victorian Centre for the History and Philosophy of Science, La Trobe University, Preprint Series, Number 5/96.

  • McLaughlin, R.: 1982, 'Invention and Appraisal', in R. McLaughlin (ed), What? Where? When? Why? Essayson Induction, Space and Time, Explanation (Australasian Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, Vol. I), Reidel, Dordrecht, 1982, pp. 69–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musgrave, A.: 1980, 'Wittgensteinian Instrumentalism', Theoria 46, 65–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musgrave, A.: 1988, 'Is There a Logic of Scientific Discovery?', The LSE Quarterly 2, 205–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musgrave, A.: 1989, 'Deductive Heuristics', in K. Gavroglu et al. (eds), Imre Lakatos and Theories of Scientific Change (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 111), Reidel, Dordrecht, 1989, pp. 15–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musgrave, A.: 1991, What Is Critical Rationalism?, in A. Bohnen and A. Musgrave (eds), Wege der Vernunft: Festschrift zum siebzigsten Geburtstag von Hans Albert, J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), Tubingen, 1991, pp. 17–30.

  • Musgrave, A.: 1993, 'Popper on Induction', Philosophy of the Social Sciences 23, 516–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musgrave, A.: 1993, Common Sense, Science and Scepticism, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, E.: 1961, The Structure of Science, Harcourt Brace, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pargetter, R. & Bigelow, J.: 1997, 'The Validation of Induction', Australasian Journal of Philosophy 75, 62–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C.S.: 1934, The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Volume 5, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K.R.: 1962, Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Musgrave, A. How To Do Without Inductive Logic. Science & Education 8, 395–412 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008698208959

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008698208959

Keywords

Navigation