Abstract
The use of history in mathematics teaching depends, either implicitly or explicitly, on some view of the rationale of mathematical development. We suppose that changes in mathematics are made for good reasons, which are simultaneously clarified and tested in the process. Therefore, philosophically comprehended accounts of historical developments are relevant means of conveying to learners the rationale of mathematical concepts and precepts. As a case in point, it will be shown how the genesis and development of complex numbers can be explained on - hence supports - a fallibilist model of ‘trials and tests’. The educational implications of this ‘quasi-experimental’ approach are briefly discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Argand, J.R.: 1806 (repr. 1971), Essai sur une nouvelle manière de représenter les quantités imaginaires dans les constructions géométriques, Blanchard, Paris.
Aspray, W. & Kitcher, P. (eds.): 1988, History and Philosophy of Modern Mathematics, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
Bombelli, R.: 1572 (repr. 1966), L'algebra, Feltrinelli, Milan.
Cardano, G.: 1545 (repr. 1968), trans. T.R. Wltner, The Great Art, MIT, Cambridge.
Corry, L.: 1993, “Kuhnian Issues, Scientific Revolutions and the History of Mathematics”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 24, 95–117.
Crowe, M.J.: 1985, A History of Vector Analysis: The Evolution of the Idea of a Vectorial System, Dover, New York.
Descartes, R.: 1637 (repr. 1954), trans. D.E. Smith & M.L. Latham, The Geometry of René Descartes, with a facsimile of the first edition, Dover, New York.
Euler, L.: 1748 (repr. 1983 of trans. by H. Maser, 1885), Einleitung in die Analysis des Unendlichen, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.
Gillies, D. (ed.): 1992, Revolutions in Mathematics, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Girard, A.: 1629, L'invention nouvelle en l'algèbre, excerpt in Struik, D.J. (ed.): 1969, A Source Book in Mathematics, 1200–1800, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, p. 81–87.
Glas, E.: 1989, “Testing the Philosophy of Mathematics in the History of Mathematics”, Stud. Hist. Phil. Sci. 20, 115–131, 157–174.
Glas, E.: 1993, “From Form to Function: A Reassessment of Felix Klein's Unified Programme of Mathematical Research, Education and Development”, Stud. Hist. Phil. Sci. 24, 611–631.
Glas, E.: 1995, “Kuhn, Lakatos, and the Image of Mathematics”, Philosophia Mathematica 3, 225–247.
Halberstam, H. & Ingram, R.E. (eds.): 1967, The Mathematical Papers of Sir William Rowan Hamilton, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Hamilton, W.R.: 1837, Theory of Conjugate Functions, or Algebraic Couples, p. 3–100 in: Halberstam & Ingram, op. cit., Vol.III.
Hamilton, W.R.: 1853, Preface to Lectures on Quaternions, p. 227–297 in: Halberstam & Ingram. op. cit., Vol.III.
Hendry, J.: 1984, “The Evolution of William Rowan Hamilton's View of Algebra as the Science of Pure Time”, Stud. Hist. Phil. Sci. 15, 63–81
Kuhn, T.S.: 1977, The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change, University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.
Lakatos, I.: 1976, Proofs and Refutations: The Logic of Mathematical Discovery, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Lakatos, I. (Worrall, J. & Currie, G., eds.): 1978, Philosophical Papers, 2 vols., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Larvor, B.P.: 1997, “Lakatos as Historian of Mathematics”, Philosophia Mathematica 5, 42–64.
Nagel, E.: 1935 (repr. 1979), “Impossible Numbers: A Chapter in the History of Modern Logic” p. 166–194. in. Teleology Revisited and other Essays in the Philosophy and History of Science, Columbia University Press, New York.
Novy, L.: 1973, Origins of Modern Algebra, Academia, Prague.
O'Neill, J.: 1986, “Formalism, Hamilton and Complex Numbers”, Stud. Hist. Phil. Sci. 17, 351–372.
Pickering, P. & Stephanides, A.: 1992, “Constructing Quaternions: On the Analysis of Conceptual Practice”, p. 136–167 in Pickering, P. (ed.), Science as Practice and Culture, University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.
Restivo, S., Van Bendegem, J.-P. & Fischer, R. (eds.): 1993, Math Worlds: Philosophical and Social Studies of Mathematics and Mathematics Education, State University of New York Press, Albany, New York.
Rose, P.L.: 1976, The Italian Renaissance of Mathematics, Droz, Geneva.
Tymoczko, T. (ed.): 1985, New Directions in the Philosophy of Mathematics, Birkhäuser, Boston.
Van Bendegem, J.-P. (ed.): 1988/89, Recent Issues in the Philosophy of Mathematics, special issue Philosophica 42nr.2 & 43 nr. 1.
Van der Waerden, B.L.: 1976, “Hamilton's Discovery of Quaternions”, Mathematics Magazine 49, 227–234.
Van der Waerden, B.L.: 1985, A History of Algebra: From Al-Khwarizmi to Emmy Noether. Springer, Berlin.
Wessel, C.: 1797, On the Analytical Representation of Direction, p. 55–66 in: Smith, D.E.: 1959, A Source Book in Mathematics, Dover, New York.
Winterbourne, A.T.: 1982, “Algebra and Pure Time: Hamilton's Affinity with Kant”, Historia Mathematica 9, 195–200.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Glas, E. Fallibilism and the Use of History in Mathematics Education. Science & Education 7, 361–379 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008695214877
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008695214877