Skip to main content
Log in

The Mirrlees Approach to the Theory of Economic Policy

  • Published:
International Tax and Public Finance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper summarizes James Mirrlees' key contribution to the theory of tax policy. It argues that the Mirrlees approach of viewing government as being constrained by imperfect information has changed profoundly how we look at the normative public policy. In this view, asymmetric information provides the limit to redistribution by restricting the efficiency-equity trade-off. It leads to consideration of other policy instruments for relaxing incentive constraints and improving the efficiency of redistributive policies. Some of these instruments include quantity controls, in-kind transfers and public provision or mandating of insurance, things we observe in practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmad, E., and N. Stern. (1984). “The Theory of Tax Reform and Indian Indirect Taxes.” Journal of Public Economics 25, 259–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akerlof, G. A. (1978). “The Economics of ‘Tagging’ as Applied to the Optimal Income Tax, Welfare Programs, and Manpower Training.” American Economic Review 68, 8–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A. B., and N. Stern. (1974). “Pigou, Taxation and Public Goods.” Review of Economic Studies 41, 119–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A. B., and J. E. Stiglitz. (1976). “The Design of Tax Structure: Direct vs. Indirect Taxation.” Journal of Public Economics 6, 55–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A. B., and J. E. Stiglitz. (1980). Lectures on Public Economics. New York: McGraw−Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besley, T., and S. Coate. (1992). “Workfare versus Welfare: Incentive Arguments for Work Requirements in Poverty−Alleviation Programs.” American Economic Review 82, 249–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackorby, C. (1990). “Economic Policy in a Second−Best Environment.” Canadian Journal of Economics 23, 748–771.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackorby, C., and D. Donaldson. (1988). “Cash versus Kind, Self Selection and Efficient Transfers.” American Economic Review 78, 691–700.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blomquist, S., and V. Christiansen. (1995). “Public Provision of Private Goods as a Redistributive Device in an Optimum Income Tax Model.” Scandinavian Journal of Economics 97, 547–567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boadway, R.W., I. Horiba, and R. Jha. (1996). “The Financing and Provision of Public Services by Decentralized Agencies.” Public Choice (forthcoming).

  • Boadway, R. W., and M. Keen. (1993). “Public Goods, Self−Selection and Optimal Income Taxation.” International Economic Review 34, 463–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boadway, R., and N. Marceau. (1994). “Time Consistency as a Rationale for Public Unemployment Insurance.” International Tax and Public Finance 1, 107–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boadway, R., N. Marceau, and M. Marchand. (1996). “Investment in Education and the Time Inconsistency of Redistributive Tax Policy.” Economica 63, 171–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boadway, R., and M. Marchand. (1995). “The Use of Public Expenditures for Redistributive Purposes.” Oxford Economic Papers 47, 45–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boiteux, M. (1956). “Sur la Gestion des Monopoles Publics Astreints à l'Equilibre Budgétaire.” Econometrica 24, 22–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brett, C. (1996). The Optimal Taxation of Families. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of British Columbia, unpublished.

  • Brito, D. L., J. H. Hamilton, S. M. Slutsky, and J. E. Stiglitz. (1991). “Dynamic Optimal Income Taxation with Government Commitment.” Journal of Public Economics 15, 44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browning, E. (1976). “The Marginal Cost of Public Funds.” Journal of Political Economy 84, 283–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvo, G. A., and M. Obstfeld. (1988). “Optimal Time−Consistent Fiscal Policy with Finite Lifetimes.” Econometrica 56, 411–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, H. F. (1975). “Deadweight Loss and Commodity Taxation in Canada.” Canadian Journal of Economics 8, 441–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandar, P., and L. Wilde. (1996). “A General Characterization of Optimal Income Tax and Enforcement Schemes.” Mimeo.

  • Christiansen, V. (1981). “Evaluation of Public Projects under Optimal Taxation.” Review of Economic Studies 48, 447–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coate, S. (1985). “Altruism, the Samaritan's Dilemma, and Government Transfer Policy.” American Economic Review 85, 46–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coate, S. (1996). “Welfare Economics and the Theory of Project Evaluation.” Mimeo.

  • Corlett, W. J., and D. C. Hague. (1953–1954). “Complementarity and the Excess Burden of Taxation.” Review of Economic Studies 21, 21–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornes, R., and Silva. (1996). “Transfers Between Jurisdictions with Private Information: The Equity−Efficient Tradeoff.” Mimeo.

  • Cremer, H., and F. Gahvari. (1996a). “Tax Evasion and the Optimal General Income Tax.” Journal of Public Economics 60, 235–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cremer, H., and F. Gahvari. (1996b). “In−kind Transfers, Self−selection and Optimal Tax Policy.” European Economic Review, forthcoming.

  • Cremer, H., and P. Pestieau. (1996). “Redistributive Taxation and Social Insurance.” International Tax and Public Finance 3, 281–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, P. A., and J. A. Mirrlees. (1971). “Optimal Taxation and Public Production.” American Economic Review 61, 8–27 and 261–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, P. A., and J. A. Mirrlees. (1978). “A Model of Social Insurance with Variable Retirement.” Journal of Public Economics 10, 295–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drèze, J., and N. Stern. (1987). “Theory of Cost−Benefit Analysis.” In A. Auerbach and M. Feldstein (eds.), Handbook of Public Economics. Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J., M. Keen, and M. Tuomala. (1994). “Income Tax, Commodity Taxes and Public Good Provision: A Brief Guide.” Finanzarchiv 51, 472–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fair, R. C. (1971). “The Optimal Distribution of Income.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 85, 551–579.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, S. (1980). “Dynamic Inconsistency, Cooperation and the Benevolent Dissembling Government.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 2, 93–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gans, J. S., and M. Smart. (1996). “Majority Voting with Single−Crossing Preferences.” Journal of Public Economics 59, 219–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guesnerie, P. (1981). “On Taxation and Incentives: Further Remarks on the Limits to Redistribution.” Discussion Paper No. 89, University of Bonn.

  • Guesnerie, R. (1995). A Contribution to the Pure Theory of Taxation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guesnerie, R. and K. Roberts. (1984). “Effective Policy Tools and Quantity Controls.” Econometrica 52, 59–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guesnerie, R., and J. Seade. (1982). “Nonlinear Pricing in a Finite Economy.” Journal of Public Economics 17, 157–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, P. (1979). “Straightforward Incentive Compatibility in Large Economics.” Review of Economic Studies 46, 263–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harberger, A. C. (1964). “Taxation, Resource Allocation, and Welfare.” In J. Due (ed.), The Role of Direct and Indirect Taxes in the Federal Revenue System. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 25–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R. (1975). “A Note on Convex−Concave Demand Systems with an Application to the Theory of Optimal Taxation.” Discussion Paper No. 197, Queen's University, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillier, B., and J. M. Malcomson. (1984). “Dynamic Inconsistency, Rational Expectations, and Optimal Government Policy.” Econometrica 52, 1437–1452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hotelling, H. (1932). “Edgeworth's Taxation Paradox and the Nature of Demand and Supply Functions.” Journal of Political Economy40, 577–616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laffont, J.−J. (1994). “The New Economics of Regulation Ten Years After.” Econometrica 62, 507–537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laffont, J.−J., and J. Tirole. (1993). A Theory of Incentives in Procurement and Regulation. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laffont, J.−J., and J. Tirole. (1996). “Pollution Permits and Compliance Strategies.” Journal of Public Economics 62, 85–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, I. M. D., and J. A. Mirrlees. (1974). Project Appraisal and Planning for Developing Countries. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood, B. (1996). “Inter−Regional Insurance with Asymmetric Information.” Mimeo.

  • Marceau, N., and R. W. Boadway. (1994). “Minimum Wage Legislation and Unemployment Insurance as Instruments for Redistribution.” Scadinavian Journal of Economics 96, 67–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirrlees, J. A. (1971). “An Exploration in the Theory of Optimum Income Taxation.” Review of Economic Studies 38, 175–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirrlees, J. A. (1974). “Notes on elfare Economics, Information, and Uncertainty.” In M. Balch, D. McFadden and S. Wu (eds.), Essays on Equilibrium Behavior Under Uncertainty. Amsterdam: North−Holland, pp. 243–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirrlees, J. A. (1976). “Optimal Tax Theory: A Synthesis.” Journal of Public Economics 6, 327–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirrlees, J. A. (1986). “Theory of Optimal Taxation.” In K. J. Arrow and M. D. Intriligator (eds.), Handbook of Mathematical Economics, Volume III. Amsterdam: North Holland, pp. 1197–1249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myles, G. D. (1995). Public Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nava, M., F. Schroyen and M. Marchand. (1996). “Optimal Fiscal and Public Expenditure Policy in a Two−Class Economy.” Journal of Public Economics 61, 119–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, A. L., and R. J. Zeckhauser. (1982). “Targeting Transfers through Restrictions on Recipients.” American Economic Review 72, 372–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, D. O. (1996). “Imperfect ‘Tagging’ in Social Insurance Programs.” Journal of Public Economics 62, 183–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson, T., and G. Tabellini. (1990). Macroeconomic Policy, Credibility and Politics. Chur: Harwood Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raff, H., and J. D. Wilson. (1997). “Income Redistribution with Well−Informed Governments.” International Tax and Public Finance 4, 407–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, F. P. (1927). “A Contribution to the Theory of Taxation.” Economic Journal 37, 47–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, K. (1984). “The Theoretical Limits to Redistribution.” Review of Economic Studies 51, 177–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadka, E. (1976). “On Progressive Income Taxation.” American Economic Review 66, 931–935.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A. (1951). Unpublished memorandum for the U.S. Treasury, reprinted as (1986). “Theory of Optimal Taxation.” Journal of Public Economics 30, 137–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1977). “Social Choice Theory: A Re−Examination.” Econometrica 45, 53–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1992). Inequality Reexamined. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheshinski, E. (1972). “The Optimal Linear Income Tax.” Review of Economic Studies 39, 297–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slemrod, J., S. Yitzhaki, J. Mayshar, and M. Lundholm. (1996). “The Optimal Two−Bracket Linear Income Tax.” Journal of Public Economics 53, 269–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starrett, D. A. (1988). Foundations of Public Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, N. H. (1982). “Optimum Taxation with Errors in Administration.” Journal of Public Economics 17, 181–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. E. (1982). “Self−Selection and Pareto Efficient Taxation.” Journal of Public Economics 17, 213–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. E. (1985). “Inequality and Capital Taxation.” IMSSS Technical Report No. 457, Stanford University.

  • Stiglitz, J. E. (1987). “Pareto Efficient and Optimal Taxation and the New New Welfare Economics.” In A. J. Auerbach and M. S. Feldstein (eds.), Handbook of Public Economics. Amsterdam: North−Holland, Vol. 2, pp. 991–1042.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tresch, R. W. (1981). Public Finance: A Normative Theory. Plano, Texas: Business Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuomala, M. (1990). Optimal Income Tax and Redistribution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Usher, D. (1986). “Tax Evasion and the Marginal Cost of Public Funds.” Economic Inquiry 24, 563–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Graaff, J. de (1957). Theoretical Welfare Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickrey, W. (1945). “Measuring Marginal Utility by Reactions to Risk.” Econometrica 13, 215–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vigneault, M. (1996). “Commitment and the Time Structure of Foreign Direct Investment.” International Tax and Public Finance 3, 479–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wen, J.−F. (1997). “Tax Holidays and the International Capital Market.” International Tax and Public Finance 4, 129–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildasin, D. E. (1984). “On Public Good Provision with Distortionary Taxation.” Economic Inquiry 22, 227–243.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boadway, R. The Mirrlees Approach to the Theory of Economic Policy. International Tax and Public Finance 5, 67–81 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008668509373

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008668509373

Navigation