Abstract
History and philosophy of science can serve the function of investigating scientific questions that are excluded by science itself. Because many things need to be protected from questioning and criticism in specialist science, its demonstrated effectiveness is also unavoidably accompanied by a loss of knowledge and a degree of dogmatism. History and philosophy of science can ameliorate this situation by working as a shadow discipline complementing specialist science in the production of knowledge about nature. In this enterprise the connection between philosophy of science and history of science is essential, since the questions that get consigned to the realm of philosophy are often, and not accidentally, the same ones buried in the historical record of past science. Some examples are given illustrating the complementary mode of history and philosophy of science, and its relations to other modes of study in history of science and philosophy of science are also examined.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Bloor, D.: 1991, Knowledge and Social Imagery (second edition), The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.
Brock, W.H.: 1992, The Fontana History of Chemistry, Fontana Press, London.
Chang, H.: forthcoming, 'Spirit, Air and Quicksilver: the Search for the Real Scale of Temperature'.
Conant, J.B. (ed.): 1957, Harvard Case Histories in Experimental Science, Vol. 1, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Cushing, J.: 1994, Quantum Mechanics: Historical Contingency and the Copenhagen Hegemony, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.
Freund, I.: 1904, The Study of Chemical Composition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Holton, G.: 1952, Introduction to Concepts and Theories in Physical Science, Addison-Wesley, Cambridge, Mass.
Kuhn, T.S.: 1970a, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (second edition), The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.
Kuhn, T.S.: 1970b, 'Logic of Discovery or Psychology of Research?', in I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1–23.
Kuhn, T.S.: 1977, The Essential Tension, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.
Lakatos, I. & A. Musgrave (eds.): 1970, Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Latour, B.: 1987, Science in Action, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Matthews, M.R.: 1994, Science Teaching: The Role of History and Philosophy of Science, Routledge, New York and London.
Nash, L.K.: 1957, 'The Atomic-Molecular Theory', in J.B. Conant (ed.), Harvard Case Histories in Experimental Science, Vol. 1, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 215–321.
Neurath, O. et al.: [1929] 1973, 'Wissenschaftliche Weltauffassung: Der Wiener Kreis [The Scientific Conception of the World: The Vienna Circle]', in O. Neurath, Empiricism and Sociology, Reidel, Dordrecht, 299–318.
Popper, K.: 1970, 'Normal Science and its Dangers', in I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 51–58.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chang, H. History and Philosophy of Science as a Continuation of Science by Other Means. Science & Education 8, 413–425 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008650325798
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008650325798