Skip to main content
Log in

An Alternative to Von Glasersfeld's Subjectivism in Science Education: Deweyan Social Constructivism

  • Published:
Science & Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An influential view of constructivism in science and mathematics educational research and practice is that of Ernst von Glasersfeld. It is a peculiarly subjectivist form of constructivism that should not be attractive to science and mathematics educators concerned with retaining some sort of realism that leaves room for objectivity. The subjectivist constructivism of von Glasersfeld also becomes entangled in untenable mind/body and subject/object dualisms. Finally, these dualisms are unnecessary for social constructivism. I will provide one example of a social constructivist alternative to social constructivism, that of the pragmatic philosopher John Dewey. In presenting Dewey's position I will appeal to Ockham's razor, that is, the admonition not to multiply entities beyond necessity, to shave off the needless mentalistic and psychic entities that lead von Glasersfeld into his subjectivism and dualism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Dewey, John: 1916a, 1980, “The Need For Social Psychology”, in Jo Ann Boydston (ed.), John Dewey: The Middle Works, 1899–1924, Volume 10 (pp. 53-63). Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale and Edwardsville.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, John: 1916b, 1980, Democracy and Education, in Jo Ann Boydston (ed.), John Dewey: The Middle Works, 1899–1924, Volume 9, Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale and Edwardsville.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, John: 1925, 1981, Experience and Nature, in Jo Ann Boydston (ed.), John Dewey: The Later Works, 1925–1953, Volume 1, Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale and Edwardsville.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, John: 1929, 1984, The Quest for Certainty, in Jo Ann Boydston (ed.), John Dewey: The Later Works, 1925–1953, Volume 4, Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale and Edwardsville.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H.: 1985, The Mind's New Science, Basic Books, Inc., Publishers, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glasersfeld, Ernst von: 1989, “Cognition, Construction of Knowledge, and Teaching”, Synthese, 80(1), 121-140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glasersfeld, Ernst von: 1992, “Constructivism Reconstructed: A Reply to Suchting”, Science & Education, 1(4), 379-384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V.: 1969, “Ontological Relativity”, in W. V. Quine, Ontological Relativity and Other Essays (pp. 26-68), Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R.: 1979, Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, Princeton, Princeton University Press, N. J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchting, W. A.: 1992, “Constructivism Deconstructed”, Science & Education, 1 (3), 223-254.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Garrison, J. An Alternative to Von Glasersfeld's Subjectivism in Science Education: Deweyan Social Constructivism. Science & Education 6, 543–554 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008645503209

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008645503209

Keywords

Navigation