Skip to main content
Log in

Operationalist Fallacies in Biology

  • Published:
Science & Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines - from a realist perspective - the influence of phenomenalism and its offshoot, operationalism, on concept formation in biology, as well as its implications for science education. To this end, the basic tenets of phenomenalism, versus those of realism, are expounded. The influence of phenomenalism and operationalism on current biology is criticized for leading to the confusion of cause with symptom - a mistake known as the operationalist fallacy. This fallacy consists in accepting pseudodefinitions, i.e., the so-called operational definitions such as ‘An acid is a substance that turns litmus paper red’, and pseudoexplanations such as ‘The weather got worse because the barometer reading dropped’. Many instances of this confusion can be found in science. This analysis, however, focuses on biology; it starts with more or less blatant examples, such as behaviorism and the concepts of genotype and homology, turning then to much less obvious examples, such as the definition of selection in terms of differential reproduction, the concept of a species as a reproductive community, the concept of isolating mechanisms, and thus the relational concept of biospecies. While it is maintained that operationalist fallacies are always to be avoided in science, it is discussed whether at least some of them are permissible in science education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Alcock, J.: 1993, Animal Behavior, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ax, P.: 1987, The Phylogenetic System, Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ax, P.: 1989, ‘Homologie in der Biologie — ein Relationsbegriff im Vergleich von Arten’, Zoologische Beträge NF 32, 487–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, G.: 1997, Selection — The Mechanism of Evolution, Chapman & Hall, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, W.J.: 1974, ‘Philosophical Foundations of Classical Evolutionary Classification’, Systematic Zoology 22, 375–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradie, M. & Gromko, M.: 1981, ‘The Status of the Principle of Natural Selection’, Nature and System 3, 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, R.H.: 1979, ‘Natural Selection and the Criteria by which a Theory Is Judged’, Systematic Zoology, 28, 600–621.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, R.H.: 1982, ‘Theoretical Issues and “Pattern Cladistics”’, Systematic Zoology 31, 286–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandon, R.N.: 1990, Adaptation and Environment, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridgman, P.W.: 1927, The Logic of Modern Physics, Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M.: 1967, Scientific Research (2 vols.), Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M.: 1977, The Furniture of the World (Ontology I), D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M.: 1983a, Exploring the World (Epistemology and Methodology I), D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M.: 1983b, Understanding the World (Epistemology and Methodology II), D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M.: 1988, ‘The Ambiralent Legacy of Operationism’, Philosophia naturalis 25, 337–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M.: 1991–92, ‘A Critical Examination of the New Sociology of Science’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences 21, 524–560, 22, 46–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byerly, H.C. & Michod, R.E.: 1991, ‘Fitness and Evolutionary Explanation’, Biology and Philosophy 6, 1–22. [Discussion pp. 23–57.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, P. & Hooker, C.A. (eds.): 1985, Image of Science, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, I. A., Orr, H. A. & Futuyma, D.J.: 1988, ‘Do We Need a New Species Concept?’, Systematic Zoology 37, 190–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donoghue, M.J.: 1992, ‘Homology’, in E.F. Keller and E. Lloyd (eds.), Keywords in Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England, pp. 170–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duhem, P.: 1908, ΣΩZEIN TA ΦAINOMENA. Essai sur la notion de Théorie physique de Planton à Galilée, A. Hermann et Fils, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endler, J.A.: 1986, Natural Selection in the Wild, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend, P.K.: 1981, Philosophical Papers, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Futuyma, D.J.: 1986, Evolutionary Biology, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haeckel, E.: 1986, Generelle Morphologie der Organismen, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, New York, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haldane, J.B.S.: 1929, ‘Heredity’, in Encyclopaedia Britannica (14th edn., vol. 11), Encyclopaedia Britannica Company, London, 484–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hills, P.J.: 1982, A Dictionary of Education, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooker, C.A.: 1987, ‘Naturalist Realism’, Revue internationale de philosophie 41, 5–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D.L.: 1968, ‘The Operationalist Imperative, Sense and Non-Sense in Operationalism’, Systematic Zoology 17, 432–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D.L.: 1976, ‘Are Species Really Individuals?’, Systematic Zoology 25, 174–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamitz, R.: 1973, Positivismus. Befreiung vom Dogma, Langen Müller, München, Wien.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanitscheider, B.: 1988, ‘Objektivität in den Naturwissenschaften’, in E. Agazzi (ed.), Die Objektivität in den verschiedenen Wissenschaften, Editions Universitaires, Fribourg, 131–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanitscheider, B.: 1989, ‘Realism From a Biological Point of View’, Dialectica 43, 141–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legendre, R.: 1993, Dictionnaire actuel de l'éducation, Guérin, Montreal, Éditions ESKA, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lennox, J.G.: 1992, ‘Philosophy of Biology’, in M.H. Salmon et al., Introduction to the Philosophy of Science, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 269–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R.C.: 1992, ‘Genotype and Phenotype’, in E.F. Keller & E. Lloyd (eds.), Keywords in Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England, 137–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahner, M.: 1986, Kreationismus — Inhalt und Struktur antievolutionistischer Argumentation, Pädagogisches Zentrum, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahner, M.: 1993, ‘What Is a Species? A Contribution to the Never Ending Species Debate in Biology’, Journal for General Philosophy of Science 24, 103–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahner, M.: 1994, ‘Phänomenalistische Erblast in der Biologie’, Biologisches Zentralblait 113, 435–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahner, M. & Bunge, M.: 1997, Foundations of Biophilosophy, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahner, M. & Kary, M.: 1997, ‘What Exactly Are Genomes, Genotypes and Phenotypes? And What About Phenomes?’ Journal of theoretical Biology 186, 55–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E.: 1988, Toward a New Philosophy of Biology, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. & Ashlock, P.D.: 1991, Principles of Systematic Zoology, McGraw Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, S.K. & Beatty, J.: 1979, ‘The Propensity Interpretation of Fitness’, Philosophy of Science 46, 263–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss, L.: 1992, ‘A Kernel of Truth? On the Reality of the Genetic Program’, in D. Hull, M. Forbes & K. Okruhlik (eds.), PSA 1992, vol. 1, Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, 335–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, G. & Platnick, N.I.: 1981, Systematics and Biogeography. Cladistics and Vicariance, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oyama, S.: 1985, The Ontogeny of Information, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paterson, H.E.H.: 1985, ‘The Recognition Concept of Species’, in E.S. Vrba (ed.), Species and Speciation, Transvaal Museum Monography 4, Transvaal Museum, Pretoria, 21–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popperk, K.R.: 1962, Conjectures and Refutations, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K.R.: 1962, Conjectures and Refutations, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K.R.: 1970, ‘Realism’, in D. Miller (ed.), Popper Selections, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1985, 220–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radnitzky, G.: 1992, ‘Definition’, in H. Seiffert & G. Radnitzky (eds.), Handlexikon zur Wissenschaftstheorie, Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag, München, 27–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riedl, R.: 1984, Die Strategie der Genesis, Piper, München, Zürich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, A.: 1985, The Structure of Biological Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salt, G.W.: 1979, ‘A Comment on the Use of the Term Emergent Properties’, American Naturalist 113, 145–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, G.G.: 1961, Principles of Animal Taxonomy, Columbia University Press, New York, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E.: 1984, The Nature of Selection. Evolutionary Theory in Philosophical Focus, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stadler, L.J.: 1954, ‘The Gene’, Science 120, 811–819.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stove, D.: 1991, The Plato Cult and Other Philosophical Follies, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchting, W.A.: 1992, ‘Constructivism Deconstructed’, Science & Education, 1, 223–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Templeton, A.R.: 1989, ‘The Meaning of Species and Speciation: A Genetic Perspective’, in D. Otte & J.A. Endler (eds.), Speciation and Its Consequences, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, 3–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Steen, W.J.: 1994, ‘New Ways to Look at Fitness’, History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 16, 479–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Fraassen, B.C.: 1980, The Scientific Image, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vollmer, G.: 1975, Evolutionäre Erkenntnistheorie, Hirzel, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Glasersfeld, E.: 1989, ‘Cognition, Construction of Knowledge, and Teaching’, Synthese 80, 121–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J.B.: 1913, ‘Psychology as the Behaviorist Views It’, Psychological Review 20, 158–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendel, H.J.: 1992, ‘Radikaler Konstruktivismus und Konstruktionismus. Die Aporien eines falsch verstandenen Naturalismus’, Journal for General Philosophy of Science 23, 323–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodger, J.H.: 1929, Biological Principles, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, Humanities Press, New York, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, B.: 1993, ‘On the Necessity of an Archetypical Concept in Morphology: With Special Reference to the Concepts of “Structure” and “Homology”’, Biology and Philosophy 8, 225–248.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mahner, M. Operationalist Fallacies in Biology. Science & Education 7, 403–421 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008640818123

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008640818123

Keywords

Navigation