Abstract
This paper discusses the various conflicting trends in mechanics education that have appeared over the past two decades, and proposes the theory of schemata as a means to resolve the conflict that exists within the literature. The conflict has two causes: the prevailing relativism that exists within science education, and the mistaken view that student alternative ideas are concepts that are well defined. We argue that student alternative ideas can be best understood in terms of schema theory, and that schema theory can offer support to the Vygotskian idea of the teacher facilitating the construction of the Newtonian system within the students zone of proximal development. Within the context of schema theory we propose the category of idealised abstraction that has as its starting point the logical structure of Newtonian mechanics rather than the cognitive state of uninstructed students.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Arons, A.B.: 1982, 'Phenomenology and Logical Reasoning in Introductory Physics Courses', Am. J. Phys. 50, 13–20.
Arons, A.B.: 1984, 'Student Patterns of Thinking and Reasoning — Part Three', The Physics Teacher 22, 88–93.
Arons, A.B.: 1990, A Guide to Introductory Physics Teaching, J. Wiley and Sons, New York.
Berry, J. & Graham, E.: 1991, 'Using Concept Questions in Teaching Mechanics', Int. J. Math. Educ., Sci. Technol. 22, 749–757.
Bliss, J. and Ogborn, J.: 1994, 'Force and Motion From the Beginning', Learning and Instruction 4, 7–25.
Boeha, B.B.: 1990, 'Aristotle, Alive and Well in Papua New Guinea Science Classrooms', Physics Education 25, 280–283.
Burbles, N.C. & Linn, M.C.: 1988, 'Response to Contradiction: Scientific Reasoning During Adolescence', Journal of Educational Psychology 80(1), 67–75.
Bruner, J.S.: 1986, Actual Minds, Possible Worlds, Harvard University Press, London.
Chalmers, A.F.: 1978, What is this Thing Called Science? The Open University Press, Milton Keynes.
Chalmers, A.F.: 1982, What is This Thing Called Science? Second edition. The Open University Press, Milton Keynes.
Champagne, A.B., Klopfer, L.E. & Gunstone, R.F.: 1982, 'Cognitive Research and the Design of Science Instruction', Educational Psychology 17(1), 31–53.
Champagne, A.B., Gunstone, R.F. & Klopfer, L.E.: 1985, 'Instructional Consequencies of Students' Knowledge about Physical Phenomena', in L. West and A. Pines (eds.), Cognitive Structure and Conceptual Change, Academic Press Inc., New York.
Clement, J.: 1982, 'Student Preconceptions in Introductory Mechanics', Am. J. Phys. 50, 66–71.
Cosgrove, M. & Osborne, R.: 1985, 'Lesson Frameworks for Changing Childrens Ideas', in R. Osborne & P. Freyberg (eds.), Learning in Science: The Implications of Children's Science, Heinemann, Portsmouth.
Costall, A. & Still, A.: 1987, Cognitive Psychology in Question, The Harvester Press, Sussex.
Davis, N.T., McCarty, B.Jo., Shaw, K.L. & Amal Sidani-Tabbaa.: 1993, 'Transitions from Objectivism to Constructivism in Science Education', Int. J. Sci. Educ. 15(6), 627–636.
Driver, R.: 1988, 'Theory into Practice 2: A Constructivist Approach to Curriculum Development', in P. Fensham (ed.), Development and Dilemmas in Science Education, The Falmer Press, London.
Driver, R.: 1994, 'The Fallacy of Induction in Science Teaching', in R. Levinson (ed.), Teaching Science, Open University PGCE Series, Routledge in association with the Open University, London.
Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E. & Scott, P.: 1994, 'Constructing Scientific Knowledge in the Classroom', Educational Researcher 23(7), 5–12.
Duschl, R.A., Hamilton, R.J. & Grandy, R.E.: 1992, 'Psychology and Epistemology: Match or Mismatch When Applied to Science Education', in R.A. Duschl & R.J. Hamilton (eds.), Philosophy of Science, Cognitive Psychology, and Educational Theory and Practice. State University of New York Press, Albany.
Eysenck, M.W.: 1984, A Handbook of Cognitive Psychology, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London.
Fischer, H.E. & von Aufschnaiter, S.: 1993, 'Development of Meaning During Physics Instruction: Case Studies in View of the Paradigm of Constructivism', Science Education 77(2), 153–168.
Floden, R. & Buchmann, M.: 1993, 'Breaking with Everyday Experience for Guided Adventures in Learning', in M. Buchmann & R. Floden (eds.), Detachment and Concern: Conversations in the Philosophy of Teaching and Teacher Education, Cassell, London.
Franco, C. & Colinvaux-Do-Dominguez, D.: 1992, 'Genetic Epistemology, History of Science and Science Education', Science & Education 1(3), 255–271.
Galili, I.: 1995, 'Mechanics Background Influences Students' Conceptions in Electromagnetism', International Journal of Science Education 17(3).
Garnham, A.: 1987, Mental Models as Representations of Discourse and Text, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.
Garnham, A. & Oakhill, J.: 1994, Thinking and Reasoning, Blackwell Publishers, Oxford.
Geilker, C.D.: 1997, 'Guest Comment: In Defence of the Lecture-Demonstration Method of Teaching Physics', Am. J. Phys. 65(2), 107.
Gilbert, J., Watts, M. & Osborne, R.: 1982, 'Student's Conceptions of Ideas in Mechanics', Physics Education 17, 62–66.
Graham, E. & Berry, J.: 1993, 'Concept Questions in Mechanics', CTM External Report (unpublished).
Graham, E. & Berry, J.: 1994, 'Concept Questions in Mechanics', in K. Houston (ed.), Staff and Educational Development Association paper no. 87 (Dec.): Innovations in Mathematics Teaching.
Hake, R.R.: 1987, 'Promoting Student Crossover to the Newtonian World', Am. J. Phys. 55, 878–884.
Halloun, I.A. & Hestenes, D.: 1985, 'The Initial Knowledge State of College Physics Students', Am. J. Phys. 53, 1043–1055.
Halloun, I.A. & Hestenes, D.: 1987, 'Modeling Instructions in Mechanics', Am. J. Phys. 55, 455–462.
Hestenes, D.: 1992, 'Modeling Games in the Newtonian World', Am. J. Phys. 60(8), 732–748.
Howard, R.W.: 1987, Concepts and Schemata, Cassell Educational, London.
Howe, A.C.: 1996, 'Development of Science Concepts Within a Vygotskian Framework', Science Education 80(1), 35–51.
Hwang, Ahn-Sook.: 1996, 'Positivist and Constructivist Persuasions in Instructional Development', Instructional Science, no. 24, 343–356.
Jagger, J.: 1985, 'Introducing Mechanics — A Response', Mathematics in Schools 14, 24–25.
Kirschner, P.: 1992, 'Epistemology, Practical Work and Academic Skills in Science Education', Science & Education 1(3), 273–299.
Kuiper, J.: 1994, 'Student Ideas of Science Concepts: Alternative Frameworks?', Int. J. Sci. Educ. 16(3), 279–292.
Leboutet-Barrell, L.: 1976, 'Concepts of Mechanics Among Young People', Physics Education 11, 462–466.
Linder, C.J.: 1993, 'A Challenge to Conceptual Change', Science Education 77(3), 293–300.
Maloney, D.P.: 1984, 'Rule-Governed Approaches to Physics — Newton's Third Law', Physics Education 19, 37–42.
Marton, F.: 1986, 'Phenomenography — A Research Approach to Investigating Different Understandings of Reality', Journal of Thought 21(3), 28–49.
Matthews, M.R.: 1997, 'Introductory Comments on Philosophy and Constructivism in Science Education', Science & Education 6(1–2, special double issue on constructivism), 5–14.
McCloskey, M., Caramazza, A. & Green, B.: 1980, 'Curvilinear Motion in the Absence of External Forces: Naive Beliefs About the Motion of Objects', Science (219), 1139–1141.
McDermott, L.C.: 1991, 'Millikan Lecture: What we Teach and What is Learned — Closing the Gap', Am. J. Phys. 59(4), 301–315.
McDermott, L.C., Shaffer, P. & Somers, M.: 1994, 'Research as a Guide for Teaching Introductory Mechanics: An Illustration in the Context of the Atwoods Machine', Am. J. Phys. 62(1).
Minstrell, J. (1982), 'Explaining the “At Rest” Condition of an Object', The Physics Teacher 20, 10–14.
Montanero, M., Perez, A.L. & Suero, M.I.: 1995, 'A Survey of Students' Understanding of Colliding Bodies', Physics Education 30, 277–283.
Mortimer, E.F.: 1995, 'Conceptual Change or Conceptual Profile Change?', Science & Education 4(1), 267–285.
Nersessian, N.: 1992, 'Constructing and Instructing: The Role of “Abstraction Techniques” in Creating and Learning Physics', in A. Duschl and R. Hamilton (eds.), Philosophy of Science, Cognitive Psychology, and Educational Theory and Practice, State University of New York Press, Albany.
Nola, R.: 1997, 'Constructivism in Science and Science Education: A Philosophical Critique', Science & Education 6 (1–2, special double issue on constructivism), 55–83.
Osborne, J.: 1996, 'Untying the Gordian Knot: Diminishing the Role of Practical Work', Physics Education ('Rethinking Post-16 Physics' special edition), 31(5), 271–278.
Perkins, D.N. & Simmons, R.: 1988, 'Patterns of Misunderstanding: An Integrative Model for Science, Math, and Programming', Review of Educational Research 58(3), 303–326.
Peters, P.: 1985, 'Even Honors Students have Conceptual Difficulties with Physics', Am. J. Phys. 50, 501–508.
Phillips, D.C.: 1997, 'Coming to Grips With Radical Social Constructivisms', Science & Education 6(1–2, special double issue on constructivism), 85–105.
Posner, G.J., Strike, K.A., Hewson, P.W. & Gertzog, W.: 1982, 'Accommodation of a Scientific Conception: Toward a Theory of Conceptual Change', Science Education 66(2), 211–27.
Ramadas, J., Barve S. & Kumar, A.: 1996, 'Alternative Conceptions in Galilean Relativity: Inertial and Non-inertial Observers', Int. J. Sci. Educ. 18(5), 615–629.
Redish, E.F.: 1994, 'Implications of Cognitive Studies for Teaching Physics', Am. J. Phys. 62(9).
Renner, J.W.: 1976, 'Significant Physics Content and Intellectual Development', Physics Education 00, 458–462.
Scaife, J.A.: 1990, 'Whatever Stirs This Mortal Frame', Mathematics in Schools 00, 000–000.
Skemp, R.: 1971, The Psychology of Learning Mathematics, Penguin Books Ltd., Middlesex, England.
Stone, C.A.: 1993, 'What is Missing in the Metaphor of Scaffolding?', in E. Forman, N. Minick & C. Stone (eds.), Contexts for Learning: Sociocultural Dynamics in Childrens Development, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Strike, K.A. & Posner, G.J.: 1985, 'A conceptual Change View of Learning and Understanding', in L.H.T. West & A.L. Pines (eds.), Cognitive Structure and Conceptual Change, Academic Press Inc., New York.
Strike, K.A. & Posner, G.J.: 1992, 'A Revisionist Theory of Conceptual Change', in R. Duschl & R. Hamilton (eds.), Philosophy of Science, Cognitive Psychology, and Educational Theory and Practice, State University of New York Press, Albany.
Terry, C. & Jones, G.: 1986, 'Alternative Frameworks: Newtons Third Law and Conceptual Change', European Journal of Science Education 8(3), 291–298.
Toulmin, S.: 1967, The Philosophy of Science (First published in 1953), Hutchinson & Co., London.
Trumper, R.: 1990, 'Energy and a Constructivist Way of Teaching', Physics Education 25(4), 208–212.
Van Der Veer, R. & Valsiner, J.: 1991, Understanding Vygotsky: A Quest for Synthesis, Blackwell, Oxford.
Viennot, L.: 1979, 'Spontaneous Reasoning in Elementary Dynamics', European Journal of Science Education 1, 205–221.
Viennot, L.: 1985, 'Analyzing Students Reasoning: Tendencies in Interpretation', Am. J. Phys. 53, 432–436.
Von Glasersfeld, E.: 1984, 'An Introduction to Radical Constructivism', in P. Watzlawick (ed.), The Invented Reality, W.W. Norton and Company, London.
Von Glasersfeld, E.: 1995, Radical Constructivism: A Way of Knowing and Learning, The Falmer Press, London.
Vygotsky, L.S.: 1962, Thought and Language (First published, 1934), Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
West, L.H.T. & Pines, A.L.: 1985, in L.H.T. West & A.L. Pines (eds.), 'Introduction', Cognitive Structure and Conceptual Change, Academic Press Inc., New York.
Whitaker, R.J.: 1983, 'Aristotle is Not Dead: Student Understanding of Trajectory Motion', Am. J. Phys. 51, 352–357.
White, B. & Horwitz, P.: 1988, 'Computer Microworlds and Conceptual Change: A New Approach to Science Education', in P. Ramsden (ed.), Improving Learning: New Perspectives, Chapter 4, Kogan Page, London, 69–80.
Wittgenstein, L.: 1974, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (First English edition, 1922). Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Zeuli, J.S.: 1986, The Use of the Zone of Proximal Development in Everyday and School Contexts: A Vygotskian Critique, The Institute for Research on Teaching (Occasional paper no. 100), Michigan State University, Mitchigan.
Zevenbergen, R.: 1996, 'Constructivism as a Liberal Bourgeois Discourse', Educational Studies in Mathematics 31, 95–113.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rowlands, S., Graham, T. & Berry, J. Can we Speak of Alternative Frameworks and Conceptual Change in Mechanics?. Science & Education 8, 241–271 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008631623632
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008631623632