Skip to main content
Log in

Should the Power to Redistribute Income be (De-)Centralized? An Example

  • Published:
International Tax and Public Finance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper deals with two questions which have recentlyreceived considerable attention in both the political debateand the academic literature: First, are fiscal programs largeror smaller when they are (de-)centralized? Second, should suchprograms be (de-)centralized? We answer these questions withina politico-economic model in which voters choose the parametersof a linear income tax taking into account how taxes affect laborsupply and migration decisions. It is shown that a decentralizedpolitical system may lead to a smaller government budget. Theconcept of a veil of ignorance is used to analyze the desirabilityof a decentralized system. It is argued that a decentralizedsystem is preferred under the veil of ignorance only if individualsare not too risk-averse and the income distribution is not toopolarized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bolton, P., and G. Roland. (1996). "Distributional Conflicts, Factor Mobility, and Political Integration." American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings86, 99–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M., and G. Tullock. (1962). The Calculus of Consent. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casella, A., and A. J. Venables (eds). (1996). "The Domain of the State." Special Issue, European Economic Review40.

  • Epple, D., R. Filimon, and T. Romer. (1984). "Equilibrium Among Local Jurisdictions: Toward an Integrated Treatment of Voting and Residential Choice." Journal of Public Economics24, 281–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epple, D., and T. Romer. (1991). "Mobility and Redistribution." Journal of Political Economy99, 828–858.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J. C. (1955). "Cardinal Welfare, Individualistic Ethics, and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility." Journal of Political Economy63, 309–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kehoe, P. J. (1989). "Policy Cooperation Among Benevolent Governments May Be Undesirable." Review of Economic Studies, 289–296.

  • Meltzer, A. H., and S. F. Richard. (1981). "A Rational Theory of the Size Government." Journal of Political Economy89, 914–927.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oates, W. E. (1972). Fiscal Federalism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson, T., and G. Tabellini. (1994). "Does Centralization Increase the Size of Government?" European Economic Review38, 765–773.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. A. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, K. W. S. (1977). "Voting Over Income Tax Schedules." Journal of Public Economics8, 329–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, H. S. (1995). Public Finance, 4th edition. Chicago: Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildasin, D. (1991). "Income Redistribution in a Common Labor Market." American Economic Review81, 757–774.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Janeba, E., Raff, H. Should the Power to Redistribute Income be (De-)Centralized? An Example. International Tax and Public Finance 4, 453–461 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008608914395

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008608914395

Navigation