Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Habitat use by early life-history stages of fishes and crustaceans along a changing estuarine landscape: differences between natural and altered shoreline sites

  • Published:
Wetlands Ecology and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The recent population explosion along the coastal zoneof the southeast United States and the Gulf of Mexicohas accelerated the development rate of waterfrontproperty, and particularly along the Gulf Coast ofMississippi. We compared use of pristine and alteredshoreline habitat by early life-history stages of fishand crustaceans to assess the potential effects ofthis development. Monthly beam trawls were taken at13 sites along shoreline habitats characterized byJuncus/Spartinamarsh, natural beach, and areasaltered by bulkheads and rubble. A total of 52,068fish (n = 48 taxa) and 288,715 crustaceans (n = 24taxa) were collected during a two year study. The mostabundant fish groups included gobiids, sciaenids,clupeids, and engraulids. Crustaceans, excluding thecopepods, were numerically dominated by mysids, bothcaridean and penaeid shrimps, and crabs (Callinectesspp.). Demersal residents were dominatedby Gobiosoma boscand Palaemonetessp.whereas clupeiformes, sciaenids and penaeid shrimpswere dominant among the nektonic and demersaltransient species. These taxa were least abundantalong stretches of shoreline altered with bulkheads orrubble, and were generally most abundant in shorelinehabitats fringed with Juncus/Spartinagrasses.This general pattern in nekton relative abundanceparallel the low diversity (reciprocal of Simpson'sDominance Index) values adjacent to altered marsh tohigh values adjacent to pristine marsh or beachhabitats, suggesting that habitats adjacent to alteredmarsh sites are less frequently used as nurseryhabitat compared to natural sites. These data supportthe hypothesis that shorelines adjacent to marshhabitat are critical to various life history stages ofecologically- and commercially-important species,illustrate the influence of altering natural marshhabitat on resident/transient nekton, and providequantitative data for resource managers in thecontinued efforts to preserve the complex estuarinemarsh landscape.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Able, K.W., Manderson, J.P. and Studholme, AL. 1998. The distribution of shallow water juvenile fishes in a urban estuary: the effects of manmade structures in the lower Hudson River. Estuaries 21: 731–744.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltz, D.M., Rakocinski, C.F., and Fleeger, J.W. 1993. Microhabitat use by marsh-edge fishes in a Louisiana estuary. Environmental Biology of Fishes 36: 109–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltz, D.M., Fleeger, J.W., Rakocinski, C.F. and McCall, J.N. 1998. Food, density, and microhabitat: factors affecting growth and recruitment potential of juvenile saltmarsh fishes. Environmental Biology of Fishes 53: 89–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brouha, P. 1993. Emulating Canada: recognizing existing aquatic and fish habitat areas as invaluable. Fisheries 18: 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, D.C. 1991. Cumulative effects of small modifications to habitat. Fisheries 16: 12–14, 16-17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chao, L.N. and Musick, J.A. 1977. Life history, feeding habits, and functional morphology of juvenile sciaenid fishes in the York River estuary, Virginia. Fisheries Bulletin (U.S.) 75: 657–702.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dokken, Q.R., Matlock, G.C. and Cornelius, S. 1984. Distribution and composition of larval fish populations within Alazan Bay, Texas. Contributions Marine Science 27: 205–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, K.C. and Baltz, D.M. 1998. Comparison of fish assemblages associated with native and exotic submerged macrophytes in the Lake Pontchartrain estuary, Louisiana. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 223: 199–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy-Anderson, J.T. and Able, K.W. 1999. Effects of municipal piers on the growth of juvenile fishes in the Hudson River estuary: a study across a pier edge. Marine Biology 133: 409–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzhugh, G.R. and Fleeger, J.W. 1985. Goby (Pisces:Gobiidae) interactions with meiofauna and small macrofauna. Bulletin of Marine Science 36: 436–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folk, R.L. 1980. Petrology of Sedimentary Rocks. Hemphill Publishing Co., Austin, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herke, W.H. and Rogers, B.D. 1989. Threats to coastal fisheries. In: Duffy, W.G. and Clark, D. (eds.), Marsh Management in Coastal Louisiana: effects and issues. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Report 89(22): 196–212.

  • Hoss, D.E. and Thayer, G.W. 1993. The importance of habitat to the early life history of estuarine dependent fishes. American Fisheries Society Symposium 14: 147–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, C.A. 1994. Cumulative impacts to wetlands. Wetlands 14: 49–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleypas, J. and Dean, J.M. 1983. Migration and feeding of the predatory fish, Bairdiella chrysura Lacépède, in an intertidal creek. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 72: 199–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kneib, R.T. 1986. The role of Fundulus heteroclitus in salt marsh trophic dynamics. American Zoologist 26: 259–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingston, R.J. 1984. Trophic response of fishes to habitat variability in coastal seagrass systems. Ecology 65: 1258–1275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Llansó, R.J., Bell, S.S. and Vose, F.E. 1998. Food habits of red drum and spotted seatrout in a restored mangrove impoundment. Estuaries 21: 294–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loesch, H. 1965. Distribution and growth of penaeid shrimp in Mobile Bay, Alabama. Publication Institute of Marine Institute, Texas 10: 41–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubbers, L., Boynton, W.R. and Kemp, W.M. 1990. Variations in structure of estuarine fish communities in relation to abundance of submerged vascular plants. Marine Ecology Progress Series 65: 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lytle, T.F. and Lytle, J.S. 1985. Pollutant Transport in Mississippi Sound. Final report submitted to Mississippi-Alabama Sea Grant Consortium.

  • Mercer, L.P. 1984. A biological and fisheries profile of spotted seatrout, Cynoscion nebulosus. North Carolina Dept. Nat. Res. and Comm. Develop., N.C. Special Scientific Report 40, Morehead City.

  • Minello, T.J., Zimmerman, R.J. and Medina, R. 1994. The importance of edge for natant macrofauna in a created salt marsh. Wetlands 14: 184–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mock, C.R. 1967. Natural and altered estuarine habitats of penaeid shrimp. Proceedings Gulf and Caribbean Fisheries Institute 19: 86–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, M.D. 1980. Grazing and predation of the grass shrimp Palaemonetes pugio. Limnology and Oceanography 25 896–902.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum, W.E. 1970. Insidious alteration of the estuarine environment. Transactions American Fisheries Society 99: 836–847.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perez-Farfante, I. and Kensley, B. 1997. Penaeoid and sergestoid shrimps and prawns of the world. Keys and diagnoses for the families and genera. Memoires du Museum National D'Histoire Naturalle, Tome 175 Zoologie, Editions du Museum Paris.

  • Peterson, G.W. and Turner, R.E. 1994. The value of salt marsh edge vs. interior as a habitat for fish and decapod crustaceans in a Louisiana tidal marsh. Estuaries 17: 235–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, M.S. and Ross, S.T. 1991. Dynamics of littoral fishes and decapods along a coastal river-estuarine gradient. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 33: 467–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Primavera, J.H. 1998. Mangroves as nurseries: shrimp populations in mangrove and non-mangrove habitats. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 46: 457–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rakocinski, C.F., Baltz, D.M. and Fleeger, J.W. 1992. Correspondence between environmental gradients and the community structure of marsh-edge fishes in a Louisiana estuary. Marine Ecology Progress Series 80: 135–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, W.R. 1989. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 3: 223–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozas, L.P. 1995 Hydroperiod and its influence on nekton use of the salt marsh: a pulsing ecosystem. Estuaries 18: 579–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozas, L.P. and Reed, D.J. 1994. Comparing nekton assemblages of subtidal habitats in pipeline canals traversing brackish and saline marshes in coastal Louisiana. Wetlands 14: 262–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz, G.M., Hines, A.H. and Posey, M.H. 1993. Shallow water as a refuge habitat for fish and crustaceans in non-vegetated estuaries: an example from Chesapeake Bay. Marine Ecology Progress Series 99: 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan, P.F. 1979. Trophic resource utilization by three species of sciaenid fishes in a northwest Florida estuary. Northeast Gulf Science: 1–15.

  • Southwood, T.R.E. 1978. Ecological Methods. 2nd Edition, Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thayer, G.W., Thomas, J.P. and Koski, K.V. 1996. The habitat research plan of the National Marine Fisheries Service. Fisheries 2: 6–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J.P. 1995 Remote sensing and relating coastal development to living marine resources and their habitats. Natural Areas Journal 15: 21–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waste, SM. 1996. The NMFS Office of Habitat Conservation: protecting the habitats of living marine resources. Fisheries 21: 24–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, J.E. and Holloway, L.F. 1974. Community structure of fishes and macrocrustaceans in ponds of a Louisiana tidal marsh influenced by weirs. Contributions in Marine Science 18: 57–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, M.P. 1979. Shallow marsh habitats as primary nurseries for fish and shellfish, Cape Fear River, North Carolina. Fisheries Bulletin (U.S.) 77: 339–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, A.B. 1984. Shrimps, Lobsters, and Crabs of the Atlantic Coast of the Eastern United States, Maine to Florida. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Coastal Sciences, Gulf Coast Research Laboratory, Institute of Marine Sciences, The University of Southern Mississippi, 703 East Beach Drive, Ocean Springs, Mississippi, 39564, U.S.A.

    M.S. Peterson, B.H. Comyns, J.R. Hendon, P.J. Bond & G.A. Duff

Authors
  1. M.S. Peterson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. B.H. Comyns
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J.R. Hendon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. P.J. Bond
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. G.A. Duff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peterson, M., Comyns, B., Hendon, J. et al. Habitat use by early life-history stages of fishes and crustaceans along a changing estuarine landscape: differences between natural and altered shoreline sites. Wetlands Ecology and Management 8, 209–219 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008452805584

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008452805584

Search

Navigation