Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An Explanation of the Dynamics of Protectionism

  • Published:
Open Economies Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Trade policy has been the rule during this century. Traditional theories, however, fail to provide convincing explanations about why the nature of trade policy has changed over time and about why protectionist pressures have not always been successful. This article suggests that change in the nature and intensity of protectionism depends on the deviation of economic performance from expectations, on the demand for institutional change, and on the size of the existing distortions. This view is then applied in order to shed new light on the role of trade policy before and after World War II.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bhagwati, Jagdish (1971) “The Generalized Theory of Distortions and Welfare.” In Jagdish Bhagwati et al. (eds.), Trade, Balance of Payments and Growth. Amsterdam: North Holland, 69–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhagwati, Jagdish (1988) Protectionism. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhagwati, Jagdish (1990) “Departures from Multilateralism: Regionalism and Aggressive Unilateralism.” Economic Journal 100(403):1304–1317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colombatto, Enrico and Jonathan Macey (1999) “Information and Transaction Costs as the Determinants of Tolerable Growth Levels.” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 155:617–642.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, Bruno (1984) International Political Economics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilpin, Robert (1987) The Political Economy of International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grilli, Enzo (1996) “Il Regionalismo Commerciale dopo l'Uruguay Round.” Moneta e Credito 196:299–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guillochon, Bernard (1994) “Coopération et protection.” Revue Économique 45(3):475–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazari, Bharat and Pasquale Sgro (1996) “Capital Mobility, Tariff Unemployment and the Real Exchange Rate.” International Economic Journal 10(3):61–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helpman, Elhanan and Paul Krugman (1985) Market Structure and Foreign Trade. Sussex: Wheatsheaf Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoekman, Bernard (1993) “New Issues in the Uruguay Round and Beyond.” Economic Journal 103(421):1528–1539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, Douglas (1994) “The New Protectionism in Industrial Countries: Beyond the Uruguay Round.” IMF Paper on Policy Analysis and Assessment, PPAA 94/5, Washington, DC.

  • Javelot, Sylvie and Jean-Marc Siroën (1994) “Les nouveaux instruments de politique commerciale.” Revue Économique 45(3):487–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahler, Miles (1995) International Institutions and the Political Economy of Integration. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang, In-Bong and Kenneth Greene (1997) “A Political Economic Analysis of Congressional Voting Patterns on NAFTA.” ICER Working Papers, 6/97, Torino.

  • McCormick, Robert, William Shughart II, and Robert Tollison (1984) “The Disinterest in Deregulation.” American Economic Review 74(5):1025–1029.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menzler-Hokkanen, Ingeborg (1988) “Time Series Properties of Comparative Advantage Indices.” Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 124(2):242–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, Douglas (1987) “The Domestic Political Preconditions of US Trade Policy: Liberal Structure and Protectionist Dynamics.” Presented at the Conference on the Political Economy of Trade: Theory and Policy. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, Douglass (1994) “Economic Performance Through Time.” American Economic Review 84(3):359–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pejovich, Svetozar (1995) Economic Analysis of Institutions and Systems. Dordrecht Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peltzman, Sam (1976) “Toward a More General Theory of Regulation.” Journal of Law and Economics 19(2):211–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, Simon (1987) “The Origins of the Heckscher-Ohlin Concept.” History of Political Economy 19(2):289–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, Dani (1992) “The Rush to Free Trade in the Developing World: Why So Late? Why Now? Will It Last?'' NBER Working Papers, 3947.

  • Rowley, Charles and Robert Tollison (1986) “Rent-Seeking and Trade Protection.” Aussenwirtschaft 41(2–3):303–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salvatore, Dominick (ed.) (1993) Protectionism and World Welfare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salvatore, Dominick (1996) “International Trade Policies, Industrialization, and Economic Development.” The International Trade Journal 10(1):21–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seers, Dudley (1983) The Political Economy of Nationalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, Philippe (1995) “Vilfredo Pareto et le protectionnisme.” Revue Économique 46(5):1241–1262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takacs, Wendy (1981) “Pressures for Protectionism: An Empirical Analysis.” Economic Inquiry 19:687–693.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verdier, Daniel (1994) Democracy and International Trade. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, Raymond (1996) “Passing Through Regionalism: The Transition to Global Markets.” World Economy 19(6):621–631.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willett, Thomas (1995) “The Public Choice Approach to International Economic Relations.” Virginia Political Economy Lecture Series, Fairfax.

  • Winters, L. Alan (1990) “The Road to Uruguay.” Economic Journal 100(403):1288–1303.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Colombatto, E. An Explanation of the Dynamics of Protectionism. Open Economies Review 11, 279–293 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008378908278

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008378908278

Navigation