Skip to main content
  • 1222 Accesses

Abstract

International trade theory has traditionally examined protection from a normative perspective: What are its consequences and when is it justified from the point of view of national welfare? Beginning in the 1980s increasing attention has been paid to analyzing protection from a positive perspective: What actually determines it? These two approaches are obviously complementary — both are necessary. This chapter addresses the latter. Other surveys are provided by Nelson (1988), Magee (1994) and Rodrik (1995).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Austen-Smith, D. (1991) ‘Rational consumers and irrational voters’, Economics and Politics 3: 73–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagwell, K., and R. Staiger (1999) ‘An economic theory of GATT’, American Economic Review 89: 215–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagwell, K., and R.W. Staiger (2002) The Economics of the World Trading System. (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernheim, B.D., and M. Whinston (1986) ‘Menu auctions, resource allocation, and economic influence’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 101(1): 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broda, C., N. Limäo and D.E. Weinstein (2008) ‘Optimal tariffs and market power: the evidence’, American Economic Review 98(5): 2032–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brock, W.A., and S.P. Magee (1978) ‘The economics of special interest politics’, American Economic Review 68: 246–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplin, A., and K. Krishna (1988) ‘Tariffs and the most favored-nation clause,’ Seoul Journal of Economics 1: 267–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caves, R.A. 1976, ‘Economic models of political choice: Canada’s tariff structure’, Canadian Journal of Economics 9: 278–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ethier, W.J. (1984) ‘Protection and real incomes once again,’ Quarterly Journal of Economics 99(1): 193–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (2002) ‘Unilateralism in a multilateral world’, Economic Journal 112: 266–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 2004, ‘Political Externalities, Nondiscrimination, and a Multilateral World,’ Review of International Economics 12: 303–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (2006) ‘Selling “Protection for Sale”’, Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting and Economics 13: 153–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (2007) ‘The theory of trade policy and trade agreements: a critique’, European Journal of Political Economy 23(3): 605–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (2008) ‘International trade agreements’, in Margit, S. and E. Yu, Contemporary and Emerging Issues in Trade Theory and Policy Howard House, UK: Emerald: 381–95.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Finger, J.M. (1988) ‘Protectionist rules and internationalist discretion in the making of national trade policy’, in H.-J. Vosgerau (ed.), New Institutional Arrangements for the World Economy. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag: 310–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1991) ‘The GATT as an international discipline over trade restrictions’, in Vaubel, R., and T.D. Willett (eds), The Political Economy of International Organizations. Boulder: Westview Press: 125–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finger, J.M., Hall, H.K. and Nelson, D.R. (1982) ‘The political economy of administered protection’, American Economic Review 72: 452–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gawande, K., and U. Bandyopadhyay (2000) ‘Is protection for sale? Evidence on the Grossman-Helpman theory of endogenous protection’, Review of Economics and Statistics 82: 139–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, P.K., and G. Maggi (1999) ‘Protection for sale: an empirical investigation,’ American Economic Review 89: 1135–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G., and E. Helpman (1994) ‘Protection for sale’, American Economic Review 84: 833–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman G.M., and E. Helpman (1995) ‘Trade wars and trade talks,’ Journal of Political Economy 103: 675–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G., and E. Helpman (2002) Interest Groups and Trade Policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, H. (1986) ‘Domestic policy foundation and domestic policy function of international trade rules’, Aussenwirtschaft 41: 171–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, D., and H. Simon (1949) ‘Some conditions of macroeconomic stability’, Econometrica 17: 245–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, A.L. (1982) ‘Declining industries and political-support protectionist motives’, American Economic Review 72: 1180–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1989) The Political Economy of Protection. Chur, London and New York: Harwood Academic Publishers;reprinted 2001: London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1990) ‘Protectionist policies as the regulation of international industry’, Public Choice 67: 101–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, A.L., Long, N.V. and Moser, P. (1995) ‘Modeling reciprocal trade liberalization: the political-economy and national-welfare Perspectives’, Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics 131: 503–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, A.L., and P. Moser (1996) ‘Trade liberalization as politically optimal exchange of market access’, in Canzoneri, M., W.J. Ethier, and V. Grilli (eds), The New Transatlantic Economy. New York: Cambridge University Press: 295–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, H., and P.C. Mavroidis (2001) ‘Economic and legal aspects of the most-favored nation clause’, European Journal of Political Economy 17: 233–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, H.G. (1953–54) ‘Optimum tariffs and retaliation’, Review of Economic Studies 21: 142–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, N.V., and N. Vousden (1991) ‘Protectionist responses and declining industries’, Journal of International Economics 30: 87–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ludema, R. (1991) ‘International trade bargaining and the most favored nation clause’, Economics and Politics 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magee, C., and S.P. Magee (2008) ‘The United States is a small country in world trade’, Review of International Economics 16(5): 990–1004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magee, S.P. (1994) ‘Endogenous protection: a survey’, in Mueller, D.C. (ed.), Handbook of Public Choice. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magee, S., W.A. Brock and L. Young (1989) Black Hole Tariffs and Endogenous Policy Theory: Political Economy in General Equilibrium. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, W. (1981) ‘Theoretical considerations on negotiated tariff adjustments’, Oxford Economic Papers, New Series 33: 135–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1984) ‘Endogenous tariff formation’, American Economic Review 74: 970–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCallum, P. (2004) ‘Protection for sale and trade liberalization: an empirical investigation’, Review of International Economics 12: 81–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitra, D., D.D. Thomakos and M.A. Ulubasoglu (2002) ‘“Protection for sale” in a developing country: democracy vs. dictatorship’, Review of Economics and Statistics 84: 497–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moser, P. (1990) The Political Economy of the GATT. Grüsch: Verlag Ruegger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, D. (1988) ‘Endogenous tariff theory: a critical survey’, American Journal of Political Science 32: 796–837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1965) The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pincus, J.J. (1975) ‘Pressure groups and the pattern of tariffs’, Journal of Political Economy 83(4): 757–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regan, D.H. (2006) ‘What are trade agreements for? — two conflicting stories told by economists, with a lesson for lawyers’, Journal of International Economic Law 9(4): 951–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, D. (1995) ‘Political economy of trade policy’, in Grossman, G., and K. Rogoff (eds), Handbook of International Economics. Amsterdam: North Holland: 1457–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, W., and A. Sykes 1996 ‘Towards a positive theory of the most-favored nation obligation and its exceptions in the WTO/GATT System’, International Review of Law and Economics 16: 27–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 Wilfred J. Ethier

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ethier, W.J. (2013). The Political Economy of Protection. In: Bernhofen, D., Falvey, R., Greenaway, D., Kreickemeier, U. (eds) Palgrave Handbook of International Trade. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-30531-1_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics