Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

On The Interpretation of Wide-scope Indefinites

  • Published:
Natural Language Semantics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper argues, on the basis of data from St'át'imcets (Lillooet Salish), for a theory of wide-scope indefinites which is similar, though not identical, to that proposed by Kratzer (1998). I show that a subset of S'át'imcets indefinites takes obligatory wide scope with respect to if-clauses, negation, and modals, and is unable to be distributed over by quantificational phrases. These wide-scope effects cannot be accounted for by movement, but require an analysis involving choice functions (Reinhart 1995, 1997). However, Reinhart's particular choice function analysis is unable to account for the St'át'imcets data. A Kratzer-style theory, on the other hand, accounts not only for the wide-scope effects, but also for the emergence of narrower-than-widest interpretations for indefinites which contain bound variables. I depart from Kratzer's analysis in claiming that St'át'imcets choice function indefinites are not 'specific'; the discourse context does not provide a value for the function variable. Therefore, I utilize wide- scope existential closure over choice functions rather than leaving the variables free. However, my analysis provides support for Kratzer's claim that English indefinites are ambiguous between a choice function interpretation and a quantificational interpretation, since St'át'imcets determiners overtly encode the English ambiguity. I conclude by suggesting that the proposed analysis of wide-scope indefinites may be universally valid.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Abusch, D.: 1994, ‘The Scope of Indefinites’, Natural Language Semantics 2(2), 83–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, M.: 1991, ‘On Some Subject-Object Non-Asymmetries in Mohawk’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9, 537–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, M.: 1996, The Polysynthesis Parameter, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beghelli, F., D. Ben-Shalom and A. Szabolcsi: 1996, ‘Variation, Distributivity and the Illusion of Branching’, in A. Szabolcsi (ed.), Ways of Scope Taking, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bittner, M.: 1994, Case, Scope and Binding, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung, S., W. Ladusaw, and J. McCloskey: 1994, ‘Sluicing and Logical Form’, Natural Language Semantics 3(3), 239–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, H.: 1993, ‘A Configurational Pronominal Argument Language’, Proceedings of WECOL, University of Washington, Seattle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, H.: 1997a, ‘Turning the Pronominal Argument Hypothesis on its Head’, paper presented at the 2nd Workshop on Structure and Constituency in Native American Languages, University of Manitoba.

  • Davis, H.: 1997b, ‘Word Order and Scrambling in St'át'imcets’, paper presented at the 4th Annual Victoria Salish Morpho-Syntax Workshop, University of Victoria.

  • Davis, H. and H. Demirdache: in prep., ‘VOS and VSO’, to appear in A. Carnie and E. Guilefoyle (eds.), VSO Languages.

  • Demirdache, H.: 1997a, ‘Condition C’, in H. Bennis, P. Pica, and J. Rooryck (eds.), Atomism and Binding, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demirdache, H.: 1997b, ‘On Descriptions in (Lillooet) Salish’, paper presented at the Colloque de Syntaxe et de Sémantique de Paris.

  • Demirdache, H.: to appear, ‘On the Temporal Location of Predication Times: The Role of Determiners in St'át'imcets (Lillooet Salish)’, Proceedings of WCCFL 16, University of Washington.

  • Demirdache, H.: in prep., ‘On Narrow Scope Indefinites’, ms., University of British Columbia.

  • Demirdache, H. and L. Matthewson: 1995, ‘Quantifier Raising and Topic-Focus in St'át'imcets’, paper presented at the Linguistic Society of America, New Orleans.

  • Demirdache, H. and L. Matthewson: 1997, ‘The Syntax and Semantics of Distributivity in St'át'imcets’, paper presented at the 2nd Workshop on Structure and Constituency in Native American Languages, University of Manitoba.

  • Demirdache, H. and L. Matthewson: in prep., ‘On Distributivity: Evidence from St'át'imcets (Lillooet Salish)’, to appear in S. Allen, R.-M. Déchaine, C. Reinholtz, and L. Saxon (eds.), Arguments and Adjuncts.

  • Demirdache, H., D. Gardiner, P. Jacobs, and L. Matthewson: 1994, ‘The Case for D-quantification in Salish: ‘All’ in St'át'imcets, Squamish and Secwepemctsín’, Papers for the 29th International Conference on Salish and Neighboring Languages, pp. 145–203. Salish Kootenai College, Pablo, Montana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enø, M.: 1991, ‘The Semantics of Specificity’, Linguistic Inquiry 22(1), 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farkas, D.: 1981, ‘Quantifier Scope and Syntactic Islands’, Proceedings of CLS 17, pp. 59–66.

  • Fodor, J. D. and I. A. Sag: 1982, ‘Referential and Quantificational Indefinites’, Linguistics and Philosophy 5(3), 355–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner, D., L. Matthewson, and H. Davis: 1993, ‘A Preliminary Report on Word Order in Northern Interior Salish’, Papers for the 28th International Conference on Salish and Neighboring Languages, pp. 139–157. University of Washington, Seattle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, J.: 1991, ‘On (In)definite Articles: Implicatures and (Un)grammaticality Prediction’, Journal of Linguistics 27, 405–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, I.: 1991, ‘Artikel und Definitheit’, in A. von Stechow and D. Wunderlich (eds.), Semantik: Ein Internationales Handbuch der Zeitgenössischen Forschung, pp. 487–535. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, I., H. Lasnik, and R. May: 1991, ‘Reciprocity and Plurality’, Linguistic Inquiry 22(1), 63–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jelinek, E.: 1984, ‘Case and Configurationality’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 2, 39–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jelinek, E.: 1995, ‘Quantification in Straits Salish’, in E. Bach, E. Jelinek, A. Kratzer, and B. Partee (eds.), Quantification in Natural Languages, pp. 487–540. Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jelinek, E. and R. Demers: 1994, ‘Predicates and Pronominal Arguments in Straits Salish’, Language 70, 697–736.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadmon, N.: 1987, On Unique and Non-Unique Reference and Asymmetric Quantification, PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Published by Garland, New York, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, J.: 1988, ‘Are Indefinite Descriptions Ambiguous?’, Philosophical Studies 53, 417–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer, A.: 1998, ‘Scope or Pseudo-Scope? Are There Wide-Scope Indefinites?’, in S. Rothstein (ed.), Events in Grammar, pp. 163–196. Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, J.-W.: 1996, Polarity Licensing and Wh-phrase Quantification in Chinese, PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Published by GLSA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Link, G.: 1983, ‘The Logical Analysis of Plurals and Mass Terms: A Lattice Theoretical Approach’, in R. Bäuerle, C. Schwarze, and A. von Stechow (eds.), Meaning, Use, and the Interpretation of Language, pp. 302–323. de Gruyter, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludlow, P. and S. Neale: 1991, ‘Indefinite Descriptions: In Defence of Russell’, Linguistics and Philosophy 14(2), 171–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthewson, L.: in press, Determiner Systems and Quantificational Strategies: Evidence from Salish, Holland Academic Graphics, The Hague.

  • Matthewson, L. and H. Davis: 1995, ‘The Structure of DP in St'át'imcets (Lillooet Salish)’, Papers for the 30th International Conference on Salish and Neighboring Languages, pp. 54–68. University of Victoria, Victoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthewson, L., H. Davis, and D. Gardiner: 1993, ‘Coreference in Northern Interior Salish’, Papers for the 28th International Conference on Salish and Neighboring Languages, pp. 217–232. University of Washington, Seattle.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, R.: 1985, Logical Form, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhart, T.: 1995, Interface Strategies, OTS working papers, TL–95-002.

  • Reinhart, T.: 1997, ‘Quantifier Scope: How Labor is Divided Between QR and Choice Functions’, Linguistics and Philosophy 20, 335–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, C.: 1987, Modal Subordination, Anaphora, and Distributivity, PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero, M.: 1997, ‘Choice Functions for Which-Phrases and Wide Scope Indefinites’, paper presented at MIT.

  • Ruys, E.: 1992, The Scope of Indefinites, PhD dissertation, Utrecht University. Published in the OTS Dissertation Series, Utrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruys, E.: 1995, ‘Weak Crossover as a Scope Phenomenon’, ms., Utrecht University.

  • Scha, R.: 1981, ‘Distributive, Collective and Cumulative Quantification’, in J. Groenendijk, M. Stokhof, and T. M. V. Janssen (eds.), Formal Methods in the Study of Language, Mathematisch Centrum, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Eijk, J.: 1997, The Lillooet Language: Phonology, Morphology, Syntax, University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Eijk, J. and L. Williams: 1981, Cúystwi Malh Ucwalmícwts, Ts'zil Publishing House, Mount Currie.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Geenhoven, V.: 1996, Semantic Incorporation and Indefinite Descriptions, SfS-Report–03-96, Tübingen.

  • Winter, Y.: 1997, ‘Choice Functions and the Scopal Semantics of Indefinites’, Linguistics and Philosophy 20, 399–467.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Room 245, Building E39, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA; E-mail

    Lisa Matthewson

Authors
  1. Lisa Matthewson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Matthewson, L. On The Interpretation of Wide-scope Indefinites. Natural Language Semantics 7, 79–134 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008376601708

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008376601708

Keywords

Search

Navigation