Skip to main content
Log in

The Estimation of Systematic Risk under Differentiated Risk Aversion: A Mean-Extended Gini Approach

  • Published:
Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines a mean-Gini model of systematic risk estimation that resolves some econometric problems with mean-variance beta estimation and allows for heterogeneous risk aversion across investors. Using the mean-extended Gini (MEG) model, we estimate systematic risks for different degrees of risk aversion. MEG betas are shown to be instrumental variable estimators that provide econometric solutions to biases generated by the estimation of mean-variance (MV) betas. When security returns are not normally distributed, MEG betas are proved to differ from MV betas. We design an econometric test that assesses whether these differences are significant. As an application using daily returns, we estimate MEG and MV betas for U.S. securities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Affleck-Graves, John F. and Bill McDonald, “Nonnormalities and Tests of Asset Pricing Theories.” Journal of Finance 46(4), 889–908, (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bey, Roger P. and Keith M. Howe, “Gini's Mean Difference and Portfolio Selection: An Empirical Evaluation.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis19, 329–338, (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, Fischer, Michael Jensen, and Myron Scholes, “The Capital Asset Pricing Model: Some Empirical Tests.” Studies in the Theory of Capital Markets. M. Jensen, ed. New York: Praeger, (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, Menachem, “The Effect of Model Misspecification on Tests of the Efficient Market Hypothesis.” Journal of Finance32, 57–66, (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, Carolyn, Paul D. Thistle, and K. C. John Wei, “The Robustness of Risk-Return Nonlinearities to the Normality Assumption.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis27(3), 419–435, (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, C. Sherman, Clarence C. Y. Kwan, and Patrick C. Y. Yip, “The Hedging Effectiveness of Options and Futures: A Mena-Gini Approach.” Journal of Futures Markets10, 61–73, (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • D'Agostino, Ralph B., “An Omnibus Test of Normality for Moderate and Large Size Samples.” Biometrika58, 341–348, (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  • DeGroot, Morris, Probability and Statistics, 2nd Ed. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimson, Elroy, “Risk Measurement when Shares are Subject to Infrequent Trading.” Journal of Financial Economics7, 197–226, (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Durbin, J., “Errors in Variables.” International Statistical Review22, 23–32, (1954).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, Eugene, “The Behavior of Stock Prices.” Journal of Business38, 34–105, (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, Eugene, Lawrence Fisher, Michael Jensen, and Richard Roll, “The Adjustment of Stock Prices to New Information.” International Economic Review10, 1–21, (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, Jerry A., “Specification Tests in Econometrics.” Econometrica46, 1251–1271, (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, Maurice, Alan Stuart, and K. Ord, The Advanced Theory of Statistics, Vol. I 5th Ed. New York: Oxford University Press, (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Dongcheol, “The Extent of Nonstationarity of Beta.” Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 3, 241–254, (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Litzenberger, Robert H. and Krishna Ramaswamy, “The Effect of Personal Taxes and Dividends on Capital Asset Prices.” Journal of Financial Economics7, 163–195, (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nair, U. S., “The Standard Error of Gini's Mean Difference.” Biometrika38, 428–436, (1936).

    Google Scholar 

  • Okunev, John U., “A Comparative Study of Gini's Mean Difference and Mean Variance Portfolio Choice Criteria.” Accounting and Finance28, 1–15, (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pink, George H., A Dominance Analysis of Canadian Mutual Funds. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Toronto, (1988).

  • Rosenberg, Barr and Marathe, V., “Tests of Capital Asset Pricing Hypothesis.” Research in Finance1, 115–123, (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Royston, J. P., “An Extension of Shapiro and Wilk's W Test for Normality to Large Samples.” Applied Statistics31(2), 115–124, (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schechtman, Edna and Shlomo Yitzhaki, “A Measure of Association Based on Gini's Mean Difference.” Communication in Statistics, Theory and MethodsA16, 207–231, (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shalit, Haim and Shlomo Yitzhaki, “Mean-Gini, Portfolio Theory and the Pricing of Risky Assets.” Journal of Finance39(5), 1449–1468, (1984).

  • Shalit, Haim and Shlomo Yitzhaki, “Evaluating the Mean-Gini Approach to Portfolio Selection.” International Journal of Finance1(2), 15–31, (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, S. S. and Wilk, M. B., “An Analysis of Variance Test for Normality (Complete Samples).” Biometrika52, 591–611, (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  • Singleton, J. Clay and John Wingender, “Skewness Persistence in Common Stocks Returns.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis21, 335–341, (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yitzhaki, Shlomo, “Stochastic Dominance, Mean-variance, and Gini's Mean Difference.” American Economic Review72(1), 178–185, (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yitzhaki, Shlomo, “On an Extension of the Gini Inequality Index.” International Economic Review24, 617–628, (1983).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gregory-Allen, R.B., Shalit, H. The Estimation of Systematic Risk under Differentiated Risk Aversion: A Mean-Extended Gini Approach. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 12, 135–158 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008348104882

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008348104882

Navigation