Skip to main content
Log in

Statistical foundations for assessing the difference between the classical and weighted-Gini betas

  • Published:
Mathematical Methods of Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ‘beta’ is one of the key quantities in the capital asset pricing model (CAPM). In statistical language, the beta can be viewed as the slope of the regression line fitted to financial returns on the market against the returns on the asset under consideration. The insurance counterpart of CAPM, called the weighted insurance pricing model (WIPM), gives rise to the so-called weighted-Gini beta. The aforementioned two betas may or may not coincide, depending on the form of the underlying regression function, and this has profound implications when designing portfolios and allocating risk capital. To facilitate these tasks, in this paper we develop large-sample statistical inference results that, in a straightforward fashion, imply confidence intervals for, and hypothesis tests about, the equality of the two betas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. K. B. Athreya, “Bootstrap of the Mean in the Infinite Variance Case”, Ann. Statist. 15, 724–731 (1987).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. P. K. Bhattacharya, “Convergence of Sample Paths of Normalized Sum of Induced Order Statistics”, Ann. Statist. 2, 1034–1039 (1974).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. P. J. Bickel, F. Götze, and W. R. van Zwet, “Resampling Fewer than n Observations: Gains, Losses, and Remedies for Losses”, Statistica Sinica 7, 1–31 (1997).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. B. Brahimi, D. Meraghni, A. Necir, and R. Zitikis, “Estimating the Distortion Parameter of the Proportional-Hazard Premium for Heavy-Tailed Losses”, Insurance:Mathematics and Economics 49, 325–334 (2011).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. M. R. Chernick and R. A. LaBudde, An Introduction to Bootstrap Methods with Applications to R (Wiley, New York, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. Donaldson and J. A. Weymark, “A Single-Parameter Generalization of the Gini Indices of Inequality”, J. Economic Theory 22, 67–86 (1980).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. E. Furman and R. Zitikis, “Weighted Risk Capital Allocations”, Insurance:Mathematics and Economics 43, 263–269 (2008).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. E. Furman and R. Zitikis, “Weighted Pricing Functionals with Application to Insurance: An Overview”, North Amer. Actuar. J. 13, 483–496 (2009).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. E. Furman and R. Zitikis, “General Stein-Type Covariance Decompositions with Applications to Insurance and Finance”, ASTIN Bulletin 40, 369–375 (2010).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. E. Furman and R. Zitikis, “Beyond the Pearson Correlation: Heavy-Tailed Risks, Weighted Gini Correlations, and a Gini-TypeWeighted Insurance PricingModel”, ASTIN Bulletin 47, 919–942 (2017).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. N. V. Gribkova and R. Helmers, “On the Edgeworth Expansion and the M-out-of-N Bootstrap Accuracy for a Studentized TrimmedMean”, Math. Methods of Statist. 16, 142–176 (2007).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. N. V. Gribkova and R. Helmers, “On the Consistency of the M<< N Bootstrap Approximation for a Trimmed Mean”, Theory Probab. and Its Appl. 55, 42–53 (2011).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. P. Hall, The Bootstrap and Edgeworth Expansion (Springer, New York, 1992).

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. B. L. Jones and R. Zitikis, “Risk Measures, Distortion Parameters, and Their Empirical Estimation”, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 41, 279–297 (2007).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. N. C. Kakwani, Income Inequality and Poverty:Methods of Estimation and Policy Applications (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  16. H. Levy, “The CAPM is Alive and Well: A Review and Synthesis”, European Financial Management 16, 43–71 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. H. Levy, The Capital Asset Pricing Model in the 21st Century: Analytical, Empirical, and Behavioral Perspectives (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2011).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. A. J. McNeil, R. Frey, and P. Embrechts, Quantitative Risk Management: Concepts, Techniques and Tools, Revised ed. (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, 2015).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. E. Mammen, When Does Bootstrap Work? Asymptotic Results and Simulations (Springer, New York, 1992).

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. A. Necir and D. Meraghni, “Empirical Estimation of the Proportional Hazard Premium for Heavy-Tailed Claim Amounts”, Insurance:Mathematics and Economics 45, 49–58 (2009).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. A. Necir, D. Meraghni, and F. Meddi, “Statistical Estimate of the Proportional Hazard Premium of Loss”, Scand. Actuar. J. 2007, 147–161 (2007).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. V. V. Petrov, Sums of Independent Random Variables (Springer, New York, 1975).

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. J. Quiggin, Generalized Expected Utility Theory (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1993).

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. C. R. Rao and L. C. Zhao, “Convergence Theorems for Empirical Cumulative Quantile Regression Function”, Math.Methods of Statist. 4, 81–91 (1995).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. A. Sandström, Handbook of Solvency for Actuaries and RiskManagers: Theory and Practice (Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL, 2010).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. N. Sawyer, Basel III: Addressing the Challenges of Regulatory Reform (Risk Books, London, 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  27. G. R. Shorack, “Functions of Order Statistics”, Ann. Math. Statist. 43, 412–427 (1972).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. J. Su, Multiple Risk Factors Dependence Structures with Applications to Actuarial RiskManagement, Ph.D. Thesis (York Univ., Ontario, Canada, 2016).

    Google Scholar 

  29. J. Su and E. Furman, “A Form of Multivariate Pareto Distribution with Applications to Financial Risk Measurement”, ASTIN Bulletin 47, 331–357 (2017).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. S.M. Tse, “On the Cumulative Quantile Regression Process”, Math.Methods Statist. 18, 270–279 (2009).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. S.M. Tse, “The Cumulative Quantile Regression Function with Censored and Truncated Response”, Math. Methods Statist. 24, 147–155 (2015).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. W. R. van Zwet, “A Strong Law for Linear Functions of Order Statistics”, Ann. Probab. 8, 986–990 (1980).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. J. von Neumann and O. Morgenstern, Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, 1944).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. S. Wang, “Insurance Pricing and Increased Limits Rate Making by Proportional Hazards Transforms”, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 17, 43–54 (1995).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. S. S. Yang, “Linear Combinations of Concomitants of Order Statistics with Application to Testing and Estimation”, Ann. Inst. Statist. Math. 33, 463–470 (1981).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. R. Zitikis and J. L. Gastwirth, “Asymptotic Distribution of the S-Gini Index”, Australian and New Zealand J. of Statist. 44, 439–446 (2002).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. Gribkova.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gribkova, N., Zitikis, R. Statistical foundations for assessing the difference between the classical and weighted-Gini betas. Math. Meth. Stat. 26, 267–281 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3103/S1066530717040020

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S1066530717040020

Keywords

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation