Skip to main content
Log in

An Island Effect in Japanese

  • Published:
Journal of East Asian Linguistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper I develop an argument for a pied-piping approach to the apparent absence of island effects in Japanese, along the lines of Nishigauchi (1986, 1990). The argument (first mentioned in Watanabe (1992b), crediting Mamoru Saito) has to do with the behavior of multiple wh-phrases in situ which are in an island; such wh-phrases must all take the same scope. On a covert pied-piping approach to island effects, the ban on distinct scopes follows straightforwardly; the island must be pied-piped to a scope position by the wh-phrases inside it, establishing the scope position for all of them. I show that the ban on distinct-scope readings does exhibit several properties of islands, including additional-wh effects. I then go on to investigate briefly the nature of pied-piping, developing a theory which accounts for the fact that wh-islands cannot be pied-piped.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Boskovic, Željko, and Daiko Takahashi (1998) “Scrambling and Last Resort,” Linguistic Inquiry 29, 347–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam (1986) Barriers, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam (1995) The Minimalist Program, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam (1998) “Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework,” MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 15, MITWPL, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, Peter, and Gabriella Hermon (1994) “Is There LF wh-movement?” Linguistic Inquiry 25, 239–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, Peter, and Gabriella Hermon (1998) “The Typology of wh-movement: wh-questions in Malay,” Syntax 1, 221–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cresti, Diana (1995) “Extraction and Reconstruction,” Natural Language Semantics 3, 79–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frampton, John (1990) “The fine structure of wh-movement and the proper formulation of the ECP,” ms., Northeastern University.

  • Grewendorf, Günther, and Joachim Sabel (1996) “Multiple specifiers and the theory of adjunction: on scrambling in German and Japanese,” Sprachwissenschaft in Frankfurt Arbeitspapier 16.

  • Hagstrom, Paul (1998) “Decomposing questions,” PhD dissertation, MIT.

  • Hermon, Gabriella (1984) Syntactic Modularity, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoji, Hajime (1985) Logical Form Constraints and Configurational Structures in Japanese, PhD dissertation, University of Washington.

  • Huang, C.-T. James (1982) Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar, PhD dissertation, MIT.

  • Huang, C.-T. James, and C.-C. Jane Tang (1991) “The Local Nature of the Long-distance Reflexive in Chinese,” in Jan Koster and Eric Reuland (eds.), Long-distance Anaphora, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 263–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayne, Richard (1994) The Antisymmetry of Syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasnik, Howard, and Tim Stowell (1991) “Weakest Crossover,” Linguistic Inquiry 22, 687–720.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longobardi, Giuseppe (1987) “Extraction from NP and the Proper Notion of Head Government,” in Alessandra Giorgi and Guiseppe Longobardi (eds.), The Syntax of Noun Phrases, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 57–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maki, Hideki (1995) The Syntax of Particles, PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut.

  • Nishigauchi, Taisuke (1986) Quantification in Syntax, PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishigauchi, Taisuke (1990) Quantification in the Theory of Grammar, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz de Urbina, Jon (1989) Parameters in the Grammar of Basque, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz de Urbina, Jon (1990) “Operator Feature Percolation and Clausal Pied-piping,” in Lisa Cheng and Hamida Demirdash (eds.), MITWPL 13: Papers on Wh-movement, pp. 193–208.

  • Pesetsky, David (1987) “Wh-in-situ: Movement and Unselective Binding,” in Eric Reuland and Alice ter Meulen (eds.), The Representation of (in)definiteness, MIT Press, Cambridge, pp. 98–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesetsky, David (1995) Zero Syntax: Experiencers and Cascades, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, Colin (1996) Order and Structure, PhD dissertation, MIT.

  • Reinhart, Tanya (1983) Anaphora and Semantic Interpretation, Croom Helm, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhart, Tanya (1995), “Interface Strategies,” OTS Working Papers, Utrecht.

  • Richards, Norvin (1997) What Moves Where When in Which Language? PhD dissertation, MIT.

  • Riemsdijk, Henk van (1984), “On Pied-piped Infinitives in German Relative Clauses,” in Jindrich Toman (ed.), Studies in German Grammar, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 165–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saito, Mamoru (1994) “Additional-wh Effects and the Adjunction Site Theory,” Journal of East Asian Linguistics 3, 195–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimoyama, Junko (1999) “The wh-island Effect for wh-in-situ in Japanese,” Paper presented at LSA. Stechow, Arnim von (1996) “Against LF Pied-piping,” Natural Language Semantics 4, 57–110.

  • Watanabe, Akira (1992a) “Subjacency and S-structure Movement of wh-in-situ,” Journal of East Asian Linguistics 1, 255–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe, Akira (1992b) Wh-in-situ, Subjacency, and Chain Formation, MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 2, MITWPL, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webelhuth, Gert (1989) Syntactic Saturation Phenomena and the Modern Germanic Languages, PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Richards, N. An Island Effect in Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 9, 187–205 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008342011424

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008342011424

Keywords

Navigation