Skip to main content
Log in

Technological aspects of the microbial treatment of sulfide-rich wastewaters: A case study

  • Published:
Biodegradation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Thiobacillus denitrificans has been shown to be an effective biocatalyst for the treatment of a variety of sulfide-laden waste streams including sour water, sour gases, and refinery spent-sulfidic caustics. The term 'sour' originated in the petroleum industry to describe a waste contaminated with hydrogen sulfide or salts of sulfide and bisulfide. The microbial treatment of sour waste streams resulting from the production or refining of natural gas and crude oil have been investigated in this laboratory for many years. The application of this technology to the treatment of sour wastes on a commercially useful scale has presented several technical barriers including substrate inhibition (sulfide), product inhibition (sulfate), the need for septic operation, biomass recycle and recovery, mixed waste issues, and the need for large-scale cultivation of the organism for process startup. The removal of these barriers through process improvements are discussed in terms of a case study of the full-scale treatment of sulfide-rich wastewater. The ability of T. denitrificans to deodorize and detoxify an oil-field produced water containing sulfides was evaluated under full-scale field conditions at Amoco Production Co. Salt Creek Field in Midwest, WY. More than 800 m3/d of produced water containing 100 mg/L sulfide and total dissolved solids of 4800 mg/L were successfully biotreated in an earthen pit (3000 m3) over a six-month period. Complete removal of sulfides and elimination of associated odors were observed. The system could be upset by severe hydraulic disturbances; however, the system recovered rapidly when normal influent flow rates were restored.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baalsrud K & Baalsrud KS (1954) Studies on Thiobacillus denitrificans. Arch. Mikro. 20: 34–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Camp CE and Sublette KL (1992) A machine vision system for controlling a Thiobacillus denitrificans bioreactor oxidizing hydrogen sulfide. Biotech. Bioeng. 39: 529–538

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho JG, Sublette KS and Raterman KT (1995) Oxidation of hydrogen sulfide by an enrichment from sour water coproduced with petroleum. Applied Biochem. Biotech. 51/52: 761–770

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasan S, Rajganesh B, and Sublette KL (1994) Large-scale cultivation of Thiobacillus denitrificans to support pilot and field tests of a bioaugmentation process for microbial oxidation of sulfides. Applied Biochem. and Biotech. 45/46: 925–934

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee C and Sublette KL (1993) Microbial treatment of sulfide-laden water. Water Res. 27(5): 839–846

    Google Scholar 

  • Ongcharit C, Dauben P, and Sublette KL (1989) Immobilization of an autotrophic bacterium by co-culture with floc-forming heterotrophs. Biotech. Bioeng. 33: 1077–1088

    Google Scholar 

  • Ongcharit C, Shah YT, and Sublette KL (1990) Novel immobilized cell reactor for microbial oxidation of H2S. Chem. Eng. Sci. 45: 2383–2389

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajganesh B, Selvaraj PT, Manning FS, and Sublette KL (1995a) Biotreatment of produced water for removal of sulfides, organics and toxicity. Appl. Biochem. Biotech. 51/52: 735–746

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajganesh B, Sublette KL, and Camp C (1995b) Pilot-scale biotreatment of refinery spent-sulfidic caustic. Appl. Biochem. Biotech. 51/52: 661–671

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajganesh B, Sublette KL, Camp C, and Richardson MR (1995c) Biotreatment of refinery spent-sulfidic caustic. Biotech. Prog. 11: 228–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Raterman K, Sublette KL, and Selvaraj PT (1993) Microbial treatment of a synthetic sour brine. J. Ind. Microbiol. 12: 21–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodina, AG (1972) Methods in aquatic microbiology. University Park Press. Baltimore, Maryland

    Google Scholar 

  • Sublette KL, Hesketh R, and Hasan S (1994a) Microbial oxidation of hydrogen sulfide in a pilot-scale bubble column. Biotech. Prog. 10(6): 611–614

    Google Scholar 

  • Sublette KL, Morse D, and Raterman KT (1994b) A field demonstration of sour produced water remediation by microbial treatment. SPE 26396 and SPE Production and Facilities. 9: 183–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Sublette, KL (1987) Aerobic oxidation of hydrogen sulfide by Thiobacillus denitrificans. Biotech. Bioeng. 29: 690–695

    Google Scholar 

  • Sublette, KL (1990) Microbial treatment of sour gases for the removal and oxidation of hydrogen sulfide. gas separation & purification. 4(2): 91–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Sublette, KL and Sylvester ND (1986) Microbial desulfurization of gases. Biotech. Bioeng. Symposium Series, No. 17: 543–557

  • Sublette, KL and Sylvester ND (1987a) Oxidation of hydrogen sulfide by Thiobacillus denitrificans. Biotech. Bioeng. 29: 245–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Sublette, KL and Sylvester ND (1987b) Oxidation of hydrogen sulfide by continuous cultures of Thiobacillus denitrificans. Biotech. Bioeng. 29: 753–760

    Google Scholar 

  • Sublette, KL and Sylvester ND (1987c) Oxidation of hydrogen sulfide by mixed cultures of Thiobacillus denitrificans and heterotrophs. Biotech. Bioeng. 29: 759–761

    Google Scholar 

  • Sublette, KL and Woolsey ME (1989) Sulfide and glutaraldehyde resistant strains of Thiobacillus denitrificans. Biotech. Bioeng. 34: 565–569

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sublette, K.L., Kolhatkar, R. & Raterman, K. Technological aspects of the microbial treatment of sulfide-rich wastewaters: A case study. Biodegradation 9, 259–271 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008262522493

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008262522493

Navigation